Path: csiph.com!4.us.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Thomas Goirand Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 00:40:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Oct 26 23:32:02 2020 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.341 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SARE_MLH_Stock10=1.66] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .debian. - helo: .mx.atlanta.gplhost. - helo-domain: .gplhost.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=0; rate: -3.5 Organization: Debian User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/18732 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/79c7d65f-17e0-9187-0e1b-221bba45d925@debian.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 38 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Debian Science List , Debian-Med Packaging Team , Debichem Team X-Original-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 00:31:44 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <79c7d65f-17e0-9187-0e1b-221bba45d925@debian.org> X-Original-References: <1e8a1ace-a38a-1d6a-fe10-d9e33e9c5896@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:12969 On 10/18/20 12:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > Python 3.9 as a supported Python3 version is now in unstable, and all binNMUs > are done (thanks to Graham for the work). Bug reports should be all filed for > all known problems [1], and the current state of the 3.9 addition can be seen at > [2] (a few of the "bad" are false packages with b-d n python3-all-dev, but not > building for 3.9, bug reports also filed). > > The major outstanding issue is the pandas stack, all other problems are found in > leaf packages (leaf in the sense of that no other package for the 3.9 addition > is blocked). > > Please help fixing the remaining issues! > > Matthias Hi Matthias, I don't know if that was on purpose, but you happen to upload Python 3.9 in Unstable the day OpenStack was released. I then rebuilt all of OpenStack to upload from Experimental to Unstable, and to my surprise, it went very well (note: all packages in the OpenStack team are running unit tests at build time on all available Python versions). Only 2 issues happened multiple times: - base64.{en,de}codestring removal (easy fix: s/string/bytes/) - Threading.isAlive removal (easy fix too: s/isAlive/is_alive/) This happened This is on a set of 200+ packages which I manually rebuilt. I do expect that there will be more packages with the same issue, so it'd be nice to have all Python-using packages rebuilt. As Lucas Nussbaum proposed such a service, should we ask him to do such a massive rebuilt? Or maybe you have other plans? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)