Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #64672 > unrolled thread
| Started by | thomasw@fastmail.cn |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-08-06 23:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2019-08-07 00:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel
Bug#934090: built-in PINCTRL drivers should be modules thomasw@fastmail.cn - 2019-08-06 23:30 +0200
Processed: Re: Bug#934090: built-in PINCTRL drivers should be modules "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2019-08-06 23:50 +0200
Bug#934090: built-in PINCTRL drivers should be modules Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2019-08-06 23:50 +0200
Bug#934090: built-in PINCTRL drivers should be modules thomasw@fastmail.cn - 2019-08-07 00:20 +0200
| From | thomasw@fastmail.cn |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-08-06 23:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#934090: built-in PINCTRL drivers should be modules |
| Message-ID | <ysfbP-7sq-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
package: src:linux I think less running code when possible and a smaller linux image is always a good thing, therefore, I propose these as modules instead of built-in. CONFIG_PINCTRL_AMD CONFIG_PINCTRL_CHERRYVIEW CONFIG_PINCTRL_INTEL CONFIG_PINCTRL_CANNONLAKE CONFIG_PINCTRL_CEDARFORK CONFIG_PINCTRL_DENVERTON CONFIG_PINCTRL_ICELAKE CONFIG_PINCTRL_LEWISBURG CONFIG_PINCTRL_SUNRISEPOINT
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-08-06 23:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Processed: Re: Bug#934090: built-in PINCTRL drivers should be modules |
| Message-ID | <ysfvb-7zh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #64672 |
Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #934090 [src:linux] built-in PINCTRL drivers should be modules Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 934090: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934090 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-08-06 23:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ysfvb-7zh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #64672 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Control: severity -1 wishlist On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 17:21 -0400, thomasw@fastmail.cn wrote: > package: src:linux > I think less running code when possible and a smaller linux image is > always a good thing, therefore, I propose these as modules instead of > built-in. > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_AMD > CONFIG_PINCTRL_CHERRYVIEW > CONFIG_PINCTRL_INTEL > CONFIG_PINCTRL_CANNONLAKE > CONFIG_PINCTRL_CEDARFORK > CONFIG_PINCTRL_DENVERTON > CONFIG_PINCTRL_ICELAKE > CONFIG_PINCTRL_LEWISBURG > CONFIG_PINCTRL_SUNRISEPOINT Ideally, yes; however pinctrl drivers may be needed very early during boot so I don't know if these will work properly as modules. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings The program is absolutely right; therefore, the computer must be wrong.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | thomasw@fastmail.cn |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-08-07 00:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ysfYe-7Zs-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #64674 |
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019, at 5:38 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Control: severity -1 wishlist > > On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 17:21 -0400, thomasw@fastmail.cn wrote: > > package: src:linux > > I think less running code when possible and a smaller linux image is > > always a good thing, therefore, I propose these as modules instead of > > built-in. > > > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_AMD > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_CHERRYVIEW > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_INTEL > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_CANNONLAKE > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_CEDARFORK > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_DENVERTON > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_ICELAKE > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_LEWISBURG > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_SUNRISEPOINT > > Ideally, yes; however pinctrl drivers may be needed very early during > boot so I don't know if these will work properly as modules. Fair enough. I don't have the hardware to test/verify. I have one laptop that uses canonlake one and its sd card reader works even if the pinctrl is a module but this is a big change so lets not fix it since its not broken. Feel free to close.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel
csiph-web