Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #64674
| From | Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#934090: built-in PINCTRL drivers should be modules |
| Date | 2019-08-06 23:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ysfvb-7zh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ysfbP-7sq-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ysfbP-7sq-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Control: severity -1 wishlist On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 17:21 -0400, thomasw@fastmail.cn wrote: > package: src:linux > I think less running code when possible and a smaller linux image is > always a good thing, therefore, I propose these as modules instead of > built-in. > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_AMD > CONFIG_PINCTRL_CHERRYVIEW > CONFIG_PINCTRL_INTEL > CONFIG_PINCTRL_CANNONLAKE > CONFIG_PINCTRL_CEDARFORK > CONFIG_PINCTRL_DENVERTON > CONFIG_PINCTRL_ICELAKE > CONFIG_PINCTRL_LEWISBURG > CONFIG_PINCTRL_SUNRISEPOINT Ideally, yes; however pinctrl drivers may be needed very early during boot so I don't know if these will work properly as modules. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings The program is absolutely right; therefore, the computer must be wrong.
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#934090: built-in PINCTRL drivers should be modules thomasw@fastmail.cn - 2019-08-06 23:30 +0200
Processed: Re: Bug#934090: built-in PINCTRL drivers should be modules "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2019-08-06 23:50 +0200
Bug#934090: built-in PINCTRL drivers should be modules Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2019-08-06 23:50 +0200
Bug#934090: built-in PINCTRL drivers should be modules thomasw@fastmail.cn - 2019-08-07 00:20 +0200
csiph-web