Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #55941 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-12-02 14:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-01-26 17:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel
Bug#846597: linux: please enable `perf data' support Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> - 2016-12-02 14:40 +0100
Bug#846597: linux: please enable `perf data' support Hector Oron <zumbi@debian.org> - 2017-01-26 16:40 +0100
Bug#846597: linux: please enable `perf data' support Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> - 2017-01-26 17:40 +0100
| From | Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-02 14:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#846597: linux: please enable `perf data' support |
| Message-ID | <sJWee-4q8-49@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Package: src:linux Version: 4.9~rc5-1~exp1 Severity: normal Tags: patch Please enable `perf data' support for perf. This requires two extra dependencies which are already in debian in the required version. During the invocation of make (for perf) you libbabeltrace needs to be explicitly enabled. Upstream disabled it by default until more distros ship a libbabeltrace with the requested functions (and Debian is the first one). All this can be found in the patch attached. Sebastian
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hector Oron <zumbi@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-26 16:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t3Ujv-Eh-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #55941 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hello, On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 02:37:21PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > diff --git a/debian/templates/control.source.in b/debian/templates/control.source.in > index 08969a3da9d9..2a1fdf048823 100644 > --- a/debian/templates/control.source.in > +++ b/debian/templates/control.source.in > @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ Standards-Version: 3.9.8 > libperl-dev <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools !nopython>, > libunwind8-dev [amd64 armel armhf arm64 i386] <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools !nopython>, > python-dev <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools !nopython>, > + libbabeltrace-dev <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools !nopython>, > + libbabeltrace-ctf-dev <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools !nopython>, Out of curiosity, The final patch that got merged has versioned depends on babeltrace >=1.5.0, but Jessie has 1.2.3. While trying to do a linux kernel backport, I have come up with a question if we really need babeltrace >=1.5.0 or if 1.2.3 has the needed features. Do you happen to know? Note: In anycase, I am preparing a backport of babeltrace. Regards > # used by upstream to build usbip > autoconf <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools>, > automake <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools>, > -- > 2.10.2 > -- Hector Oron
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-26 17:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t3Vfz-1dq-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #56764 |
On 2017-01-26 16:36:45 [+0100], Hector Oron wrote: > Hello, Hi, > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 02:37:21PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > diff --git a/debian/templates/control.source.in b/debian/templates/control.source.in > > index 08969a3da9d9..2a1fdf048823 100644 > > --- a/debian/templates/control.source.in > > +++ b/debian/templates/control.source.in > > @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ Standards-Version: 3.9.8 > > libperl-dev <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools !nopython>, > > libunwind8-dev [amd64 armel armhf arm64 i386] <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools !nopython>, > > python-dev <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools !nopython>, > > + libbabeltrace-dev <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools !nopython>, > > + libbabeltrace-ctf-dev <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools !nopython>, > > Out of curiosity, > > The final patch that got merged has versioned depends on babeltrace >=1.5.0, but > Jessie has 1.2.3. While trying to do a linux kernel backport, I have come up > with a question if we really need babeltrace >=1.5.0 or if 1.2.3 has the needed > features. Do you happen to know? You need babeltrace >= 1.5.0 for perf-data to work and that was the whole point of libbabeltrace. If you don't care about perf-data you can drop that babeltrace dependency (and not enable it later while building perf). I am happy that the next stable will bring working perf-data to Debian and I don't need it in backports (as it will introduce yet another library). > Note: In anycase, I am preparing a backport of babeltrace. > > Regards Sebastian
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel
csiph-web