Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #56764

Bug#846597: linux: please enable `perf data' support

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hello,

On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 02:37:21PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> diff --git a/debian/templates/control.source.in b/debian/templates/control.source.in
> index 08969a3da9d9..2a1fdf048823 100644
> --- a/debian/templates/control.source.in
> +++ b/debian/templates/control.source.in
> @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ Standards-Version: 3.9.8
>   libperl-dev <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools !nopython>,
>   libunwind8-dev [amd64 armel armhf arm64 i386] <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools !nopython>,
>   python-dev <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools !nopython>,
> + libbabeltrace-dev <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools !nopython>,
> + libbabeltrace-ctf-dev <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools !nopython>,

Out of curiosity,

The final patch that got merged has versioned depends on babeltrace >=1.5.0, but
Jessie has 1.2.3. While trying to do a linux kernel backport, I have come up
with a question if we really need babeltrace >=1.5.0 or if 1.2.3 has the needed
features. Do you happen to know?

Note: In anycase, I am preparing a backport of babeltrace.

Regards

>  # used by upstream to build usbip
>   autoconf <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools>,
>   automake <!stage1 !pkg.linux.notools>,
> -- 
> 2.10.2
> 


-- 
  Hector Oron

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#846597: linux: please enable `perf data' support Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> - 2016-12-02 14:40 +0100
  Bug#846597: linux: please enable `perf data' support Hector Oron <zumbi@debian.org> - 2017-01-26 16:40 +0100
    Bug#846597: linux: please enable `perf data' support Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> - 2017-01-26 17:40 +0100

csiph-web