Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #90714 > unrolled thread

cpp-httplib FTBFS in unstable

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

Contents

  cpp-httplib FTBFS in unstable Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2026-01-06 19:40 +0100
    Re: cpp-httplib FTBFS in unstable "Andrea Pappacoda" <andrea@pappacoda.it> - 2026-01-17 17:00 +0100

#90714 — cpp-httplib FTBFS in unstable

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi Andrea,

I see you've made a lot of updates to cpp-httplib in experimental, but
since the release of trixie those should now be going to unstable.

Currently it FTBFS in unstable, so there is no build for the loong64
architecture in the main archive.  That blocks building taskflow, which
blocks building rapidfuzz, which blocks building python-cmarkgfm, which
blocks building rsync, which blocks building linux.

If the changes in experimental still aren't ready to go into unstable,
could you instead upload a targeted fix for the FTBFS in unstable?

Thanks,
Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
The Peter principle: In a hierarchy, every employee tends to rise to
their level of incompetence.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#90856

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi Ben

On Tue Jan 6, 2026 at 7:34 PM CET, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I see you've made a lot of updates to cpp-httplib in experimental, but
> since the release of trixie those should now be going to unstable.

Yes, I'm aware of that. I just hadn't have the time to open a transition 
slot with the release team :/

> Currently it FTBFS in unstable, so there is no build for the loong64
> architecture in the main archive.  That blocks building taskflow, which
> blocks building rapidfuzz, which blocks building python-cmarkgfm, which
> blocks building rsync, which blocks building linux.

Woah, that's an unexpected dependency chain!

> If the changes in experimental still aren't ready to go into unstable,
> could you instead upload a targeted fix for the FTBFS in unstable?

Yeah, the package is just ready. Feel free to do that yourself, if you 
have the energies; I'm in the LowThresholdNMU list!

If not, I will eventually do it.

Bye :)

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel

csiph-web