Path: csiph.com!server.example.net!srl.newsdeef.eu!news.corradoroberto.it!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: "Andrea Pappacoda" Newsgroups: linux.debian.kernel Subject: Re: cpp-httplib FTBFS in unstable Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2026 17:00:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: "Ben Hutchings" X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-kernel-request@lists.debian.org Sat Jan 17 15:52:44 2026 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.198 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -4.6 X-Greylist: delayed 532 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at bendel; Sat, 17 Jan 2026 15:52:29 UTC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=cfbe362579479d124a873acb7917f8ff3b64760a10ea4b6e4f6b6884f7ec; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0 X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/153226 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/DFQZA1UH9U3Y.2EQJSC1UWE999@pappacoda.it Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 42 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: , "Debian kernel maintainers" X-Original-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2026 16:43:31 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <650bd92616c66509a890ecf3f93bcbf1e68a7651.camel@decadent.org.uk> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.kernel:90856 --cfbe362579479d124a873acb7917f8ff3b64760a10ea4b6e4f6b6884f7ec Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=Flowed Hi Ben On Tue Jan 6, 2026 at 7:34 PM CET, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I see you've made a lot of updates to cpp-httplib in experimental, but > since the release of trixie those should now be going to unstable. Yes, I'm aware of that. I just hadn't have the time to open a transition=20 slot with the release team :/ > Currently it FTBFS in unstable, so there is no build for the loong64 > architecture in the main archive. That blocks building taskflow, which > blocks building rapidfuzz, which blocks building python-cmarkgfm, which > blocks building rsync, which blocks building linux. Woah, that's an unexpected dependency chain! > If the changes in experimental still aren't ready to go into unstable, > could you instead upload a targeted fix for the FTBFS in unstable? Yeah, the package is just ready. Feel free to do that yourself, if you=20 have the energies; I'm in the LowThresholdNMU list! If not, I will eventually do it. Bye :) --cfbe362579479d124a873acb7917f8ff3b64760a10ea4b6e4f6b6884f7ec Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIoEABYKADIWIQS6VuNIvZRFHt7JcAdKkgiiRVB3pwUCaWuuJBQcYW5kcmVhQHBh cHBhY29kYS5pdAAKCRBKkgiiRVB3p0F/AQDvDnZF0KzRiJaiOS5jrkQaCdJoWIop Jn8D8mi2LhRbDAEAm/lYJnLJY2CeHtLmupDzsY+KJ2ZqlEVSTh0ML1hGLwc= =T1vo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cfbe362579479d124a873acb7917f8ff3b64760a10ea4b6e4f6b6884f7ec--