Processed: Re: initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u?

Path	csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	"Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.kernel
Subject	Processed: Re: initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u?
Date	Sun, 31 Dec 2017 17:50:01 +0100
Message-ID	<v2OY9-72l-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<v2OOu-6Z2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rshW4-5I2-55@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-kernel-request@lists.debian.org Sun Dec 31 16:33:34 2017
Old-Return-Path	<debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-9.31 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Content-Disposition	inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding	quoted-printable
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Mailer	MIME-tools 5.508 (Entity 5.508)
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Debian-Pr-Package	debhelper initramfs-tools
X-Debian-Pr-Source	debhelper initramfs-tools
X-Debian-Pr-Message	transcript
X-Mailing-List	<debian-kernel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/115248
List-ID	<debian-kernel.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/handler.s.B822730.151473782726031.transcript@bugs.debian.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	14
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	debhelper-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date	Sun, 31 Dec 2017 16:33:03 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID	<handler.s.B822730.151473782726031.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
X-Original-References	<54f91ebe-3f04-cde5-63a9-8cd5556cadf7@thykier.net> <146170141409.10955.14109315527646992101.reportbug@mangetsu.thykier.net>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.kernel:59803

Show key headers only | View raw

Processing control commands:

> block 491027 by -1
Bug #491027 [debhelper] debhelper: please add dh_initramfs to handle initramfs hooks and postinst/rm snippets
491027 was not blocked by any bugs.
491027 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 491027: 822730

-- 
491027: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=491027
822730: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822730
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Thread

Bug#822730: initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u? Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2016-04-26 22:40 +0200
  Bug#822730: initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u? Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2017-07-09 15:00 +0200
    Bug#822730: initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u? Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2017-12-31 17:40 +0100
      Bug#822730: initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u? Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2018-02-18 08:40 +0100
        Bug#822730: initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-07-19 03:10 +0200
  Processed: Re: initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to a  "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u? "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2017-12-31 17:50 +0100
  Bug#822730: marked as done (initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to  a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u?) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2018-04-04 21:50 +0200
  Processed: Re: Bug#822730: initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to  a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u? "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2020-04-18 00:30 +0200

csiph-web