Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #53790
| From | Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.maint.dpkg, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#822730: initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u? |
| Date | 2016-04-26 22:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rshW4-5I2-55@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.125
Severity: wishlist
Usertags: declarative-packaging
Hi,
The update-initramfs tool currently has a bit of magic for deferring
changes during upgrades (by exploiting dpkg-trigger). This is fine,
but I was wondering if we could perhaps add a file-based interest
trigger (or simply migrate to a declarative activate-noawait trigger).
I got basically two reasons for this bug:
* Request for support in debhelper #491027 and lintian #678962
* Promotion of "declarative packaging"[1].
At first glance[2], I would recommend adding a file-based trigger for the
following reasons:
* Packages would just need to install files in
usr/share/initramfs-tools/{hooks,scripts} and initramfs-tools
would take care of the rest.
* There would be no need for lintian tags or changes to debhelper to
improve support. It would "just work"(tm).
This file-based trigger would be used in /addition/ to the existing
trigger. AFAICT, some packages only conditionally need to trigger
update-initramfs (and these would still need to be able to call
"dpkg-trigger --no-await update-initramfs").
* What do you think about this suggestion?
* Alternatively, would the use of declarative triggers[3] be ok for
the debhelper support?
Thanks,
~Niels
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/Spec/DeclarativePackaging
[2] I admit having very limited overview over the use-cases around
update-initramfs.
[3] Like we did with ldconfig. Basically add
activate-noawait update-initramfs
to the packages' triggers file.
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#822730: initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u? Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2016-04-26 22:40 +0200
Bug#822730: initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u? Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2017-07-09 15:00 +0200
Bug#822730: initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u? Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2017-12-31 17:40 +0100
Processed: Re: initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u? "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2017-12-31 17:50 +0100
csiph-web