Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #52591

Re: Kernel version for stretch

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.maint.boot
Subject Re: Kernel version for stretch
Date Fri, 05 Feb 2016 19:50:02 +0100
Message-ID <qYTCa-3TO-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qVD0S-7IE-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXDSN-7AO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qYEWt-2Kf-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>, Debian release team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-release-request@lists.debian.org Fri Feb 5 18:49:17 2016
Old-Return-Path <niels@thykier.net>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-12.82 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
X-Halone-Cookie ac2bb983e1be37450d4315fb800772a9111ad43b
X-Halone-ID 1f34dc25-cc39-11e5-882a-b82a72cffc46
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=thykier.net; s=20140924; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to: references; bh=+o1SHEnc+v8jK9GjjpqTTGnyfLJSYPCZ7BMQ+VXKp2E=; b=cF+sLrpUzv2R2Po68ftls2XLVXup2JbmjmaATj1hzVd9fxO6hMHeRVM0s31Sjk8A9HWRk3JCGEFe7 P/XSvTQdE7JRyKeo7Hu4d8AAih1J2tK8XBRQVGtBbaDYoC8Bm63h9k+qSPr0DXPcVmh6K0Ndc00hhr XfwSYf0c076qXFx8=
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status N1110
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MvnLLiu4l9ijIsPXaKN6UrxuRQeqNg5Ms"
X-Mailing-List <debian-release@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/94404
List-ID <debian-release.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/56B4EE94.3070909@thykier.net
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 113
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc Debian kernel maintainers <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>, debian-boot@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Fri, 5 Feb 2016 18:48:52 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID <56B4EE94.3070909@thykier.net>
X-Original-References <1453918891.20647.32.camel@decadent.org.uk> <56B05BF7.7090408@thykier.net> <1454641214.20702.52.camel@decadent.org.uk>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.devel.release:60971 linux.debian.kernel:52591 linux.debian.maint.boot:47567

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Ben Hutchings:
> On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 07:34 +0000, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Would you prefer that we moved future freezes (i.e. Buster and later),
>> so we could always rely on Greg's branch?
> 
> Yes, I would.
> 

Ok, we will take it into consideration for the planning of the next freeze.

> [...]
>>    - How certain are we on the 22nd being the actual release date?
> 
> I thought that 10 week cycles were rare, but I checked this and now I'm
> much less confident.  Rounding to the nearest week, the distribution of
> release cycle lengths from 3.2 to 4.4 inclusive, is:
> 
>  8 weeks: *           ( 1)
>  9 weeks: **********  (10)
> 10 weeks: **********  (10)
> 11 weeks: **          ( 2)
> 
> (I chose this range to exclude the 3.1 release delayed by the
> kernel.org compromise.)
> 
> So it seems quite possible that 4.10 could be released later in January
> or in February.
> 
> [...]

Ok, so a reasonable guess would be actually be 10 weeks, which puts us
at the 29th of January?  An upstream stable update would come 3-4 weeks
later.

>>  * How difficult/disruptive do you expect the migration to linux 4.10
>>    will be?
>>    - Is this something we can reasonably do within a month?  2 months?
> 
> Migration from what, 4.9?
> 

Yes - on the assumption that we are going to use 4.10, I presume it
would be easiest to upgrade from 4.9 rather than 4.4 (admittedly, I am
ignoring roll-backs for a moment).

>> [...]
> 
>>    - How long does Greg's LTS last?  We would spend at least a year of
>>      it before January 22nd 2017.
> 
> About 15 months.
> 
> [...]

So Greg's LTS will almost be over by the time 4.10 is released? Seems
like we are not getting a lot from sticking with 4.4 then?



From what I can gather so far:

 * We are looking at moving the freeze at least 2 months if we want
   Linux 4.10.
   - At +2 months, Linux 4.10 would be just before the "deep freeze"
     (Assuming a 10 week release cycle for Linux).

 * If we stick with 4.4, the Debian Linux maintainers receives
   practically no advantage from Greg's LTS effort.


Thanks,
~Niels



Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-27 19:30 +0100
  Re: Kernel version for stretch Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-01-28 20:10 +0100
    Re: Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-28 21:20 +0100
      Re: Kernel version for stretch Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-01-30 15:40 +0100
        Re: Kernel version for stretch Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org> - 2016-02-07 02:00 +0100
    Re: Kernel version for stretch maximilian attems <maks@stro.at> - 2016-01-29 00:10 +0100
      Re: Kernel version for stretch Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-01-30 15:40 +0100
        Re: Kernel version for stretch maximilian attems <maks@stro.at> - 2016-01-30 18:40 +0100
  Re: Kernel version for stretch Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2016-02-02 08:50 +0100
    Re: Kernel version for stretch Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2016-02-02 14:30 +0100
      Re: Kernel version for stretch Karsten Merker <merker@debian.org> - 2016-02-03 08:40 +0100
        Re: Kernel version for stretch Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2016-02-03 19:40 +0100
        Re: Kernel version for stretch Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> - 2016-02-04 04:40 +0100
    Re: Kernel version for stretch Karsten Merker <merker@debian.org> - 2016-02-03 08:30 +0100
    Re: Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-02-05 04:10 +0100
      Re: Kernel version for stretch Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2016-02-05 19:50 +0100
        Re: Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-02-14 17:00 +0100
          Re: Kernel version for stretch Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> - 2016-02-14 21:50 +0100
            Re: Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-02-15 13:20 +0100
    Re: Kernel version for stretch Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org> - 2016-02-15 09:50 +0100
  [Decision] Kernel version for stretch Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2016-02-24 22:50 +0100
    Re: [Decision] Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-03-02 12:30 +0100

csiph-web