Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #52591
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.maint.boot |
| Subject | Re: Kernel version for stretch |
| Date | Fri, 05 Feb 2016 19:50:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qYTCa-3TO-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qVD0S-7IE-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXDSN-7AO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qYEWt-2Kf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>, Debian release team <debian-release@lists.debian.org> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-release-request@lists.debian.org Fri Feb 5 18:49:17 2016 |
| Old-Return-Path | <niels@thykier.net> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-12.82 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no |
| X-Halone-Cookie | ac2bb983e1be37450d4315fb800772a9111ad43b |
| X-Halone-ID | 1f34dc25-cc39-11e5-882a-b82a72cffc46 |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=thykier.net; s=20140924; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to: references; bh=+o1SHEnc+v8jK9GjjpqTTGnyfLJSYPCZ7BMQ+VXKp2E=; b=cF+sLrpUzv2R2Po68ftls2XLVXup2JbmjmaATj1hzVd9fxO6hMHeRVM0s31Sjk8A9HWRk3JCGEFe7 P/XSvTQdE7JRyKeo7Hu4d8AAih1J2tK8XBRQVGtBbaDYoC8Bm63h9k+qSPr0DXPcVmh6K0Ndc00hhr XfwSYf0c076qXFx8= |
| X-Enigmail-Draft-Status | N1110 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MvnLLiu4l9ijIsPXaKN6UrxuRQeqNg5Ms" |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-release@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/94404 |
| List-ID | <debian-release.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/56B4EE94.3070909@thykier.net |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 113 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Cc | Debian kernel maintainers <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>, debian-boot@lists.debian.org |
| X-Original-Date | Fri, 5 Feb 2016 18:48:52 +0000 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <56B4EE94.3070909@thykier.net> |
| X-Original-References | <1453918891.20647.32.camel@decadent.org.uk> <56B05BF7.7090408@thykier.net> <1454641214.20702.52.camel@decadent.org.uk> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.devel.release:60971 linux.debian.kernel:52591 linux.debian.maint.boot:47567 |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Ben Hutchings:
> On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 07:34 +0000, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Would you prefer that we moved future freezes (i.e. Buster and later),
>> so we could always rely on Greg's branch?
>
> Yes, I would.
>
Ok, we will take it into consideration for the planning of the next freeze.
> [...]
>> - How certain are we on the 22nd being the actual release date?
>
> I thought that 10 week cycles were rare, but I checked this and now I'm
> much less confident. Rounding to the nearest week, the distribution of
> release cycle lengths from 3.2 to 4.4 inclusive, is:
>
> 8 weeks: * ( 1)
> 9 weeks: ********** (10)
> 10 weeks: ********** (10)
> 11 weeks: ** ( 2)
>
> (I chose this range to exclude the 3.1 release delayed by the
> kernel.org compromise.)
>
> So it seems quite possible that 4.10 could be released later in January
> or in February.
>
> [...]
Ok, so a reasonable guess would be actually be 10 weeks, which puts us
at the 29th of January? An upstream stable update would come 3-4 weeks
later.
>> * How difficult/disruptive do you expect the migration to linux 4.10
>> will be?
>> - Is this something we can reasonably do within a month? 2 months?
>
> Migration from what, 4.9?
>
Yes - on the assumption that we are going to use 4.10, I presume it
would be easiest to upgrade from 4.9 rather than 4.4 (admittedly, I am
ignoring roll-backs for a moment).
>> [...]
>
>> - How long does Greg's LTS last? We would spend at least a year of
>> it before January 22nd 2017.
>
> About 15 months.
>
> [...]
So Greg's LTS will almost be over by the time 4.10 is released? Seems
like we are not getting a lot from sticking with 4.4 then?
From what I can gather so far:
* We are looking at moving the freeze at least 2 months if we want
Linux 4.10.
- At +2 months, Linux 4.10 would be just before the "deep freeze"
(Assuming a 10 week release cycle for Linux).
* If we stick with 4.4, the Debian Linux maintainers receives
practically no advantage from Greg's LTS effort.
Thanks,
~Niels
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-27 19:30 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-01-28 20:10 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-28 21:20 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-01-30 15:40 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org> - 2016-02-07 02:00 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch maximilian attems <maks@stro.at> - 2016-01-29 00:10 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-01-30 15:40 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch maximilian attems <maks@stro.at> - 2016-01-30 18:40 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2016-02-02 08:50 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2016-02-02 14:30 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Karsten Merker <merker@debian.org> - 2016-02-03 08:40 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2016-02-03 19:40 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> - 2016-02-04 04:40 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Karsten Merker <merker@debian.org> - 2016-02-03 08:30 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-02-05 04:10 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2016-02-05 19:50 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-02-14 17:00 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> - 2016-02-14 21:50 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-02-15 13:20 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org> - 2016-02-15 09:50 +0100
[Decision] Kernel version for stretch Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2016-02-24 22:50 +0100
Re: [Decision] Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-03-02 12:30 +0100
csiph-web