Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #52455
| From | Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? |
| Date | 2016-01-26 14:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qVcal-4P7-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <qUQMz-5vw-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <qUSlm-6Ia-45@gated-at.bofh.it> <qUSOq-7cE-85@gated-at.bofh.it> <qV7aG-1qe-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVbo0-4eF-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 13:53 +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 08:24:16AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: [...] > > IMHO RPi1 is best supported by Raspbian, or if people really want it in > > Debian then by armel, but not by an armhf+armel hybrid which involves > > supporting v6 in some way on armhf. > > I had a few RPi1s running with armel. For simple tasks (e.g. > network2gpio or i2c) it's more than enough. I wonder if an armel > -armmp kernel would be worth the trouble. We currently have the > following armel kernel targets: > > -kirkwood (multiplatform support since v3.14 (ba5a37e521942)) > -orion5x (multiplatform support since v4.5 [0]) > -versatile (DT only since v4.5 [0]) > > So maybe switch to -armv5 and -armv6 multiplatform kernels from > v4.5+? ARMv5 multiplatform would be nice, but we're constrained by the size of flash partitions on the small machines that are supported so I don't think this would work. > -armv5 kirkwood + orion5x + versatile > -armv6 bcm2036 > > [0] http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1601.2/03005.html I don't think we're going to add any more hardware support to the armel port at this stage. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Q. Which is the greater problem in the world today, ignorance or apathy? A. I don't know and I couldn't care less.
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2016-01-16 03:30 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Ian Campbell <ijc@debian.org> - 2016-01-25 14:30 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2016-01-25 15:50 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-25 16:00 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Ian Campbell <ijc@debian.org> - 2016-01-25 16:10 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2016-01-25 17:30 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Ian Campbell <ijc@debian.org> - 2016-01-25 16:00 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2016-01-25 17:40 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Sebastian Reichel <sre@debian.org> - 2016-01-25 18:10 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Ian Campbell <ijc@debian.org> - 2016-01-26 09:30 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Sebastian Reichel <sre@debian.org> - 2016-01-26 14:00 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-26 14:50 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-27 18:50 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Sebastian Reichel <sre@debian.org> - 2016-01-27 19:20 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-27 19:30 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Sebastian Reichel <sre@debian.org> - 2016-01-27 21:00 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2016-01-26 16:20 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk> - 2016-01-26 10:50 +0100
csiph-web