Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #52479
| From | Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? |
| Date | 2016-01-27 19:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qVD0T-7IE-45@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <qV7aG-1qe-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVbo0-4eF-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVcal-4P7-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVCoa-78y-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVCRd-7CM-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 19:16 +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 05:41:58PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > ARMv5 multiplatform would be nice, but we're constrained by the size of > > > flash partitions on the small machines that are supported so I don't > > > think this would work. > > > > I had another think about this and compared kirkwood and orion5x. It > > seems that they are similar enough that we can combine them without > > breaking the size limit (~2 MB compressed), though the result is very > > close. Combining with versatile is probably not possible. > > 2MB is... tiny :( I guess it's an arbitrary limit from the > bootloaders? In that case it could be circumvented by chainloading > another bootloader? Probably not worth the trouble (since it's old > HW), though. [...] It's a limitation of the flash partitioning scheme, though I expect that's built into the bootloader. Several other NAS boxes have even smaller partitions for the kernel (1.4 or 1.5 MB), which was just barely supportable with 3.16 (jessie) but not any more. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings 73.46% of all statistics are made up.
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2016-01-16 03:30 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Ian Campbell <ijc@debian.org> - 2016-01-25 14:30 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2016-01-25 15:50 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-25 16:00 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Ian Campbell <ijc@debian.org> - 2016-01-25 16:10 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2016-01-25 17:30 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Ian Campbell <ijc@debian.org> - 2016-01-25 16:00 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2016-01-25 17:40 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Sebastian Reichel <sre@debian.org> - 2016-01-25 18:10 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Ian Campbell <ijc@debian.org> - 2016-01-26 09:30 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Sebastian Reichel <sre@debian.org> - 2016-01-26 14:00 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-26 14:50 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-27 18:50 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Sebastian Reichel <sre@debian.org> - 2016-01-27 19:20 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-27 19:30 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Sebastian Reichel <sre@debian.org> - 2016-01-27 21:00 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2016-01-26 16:20 +0100
Re: Testing versatile kernel on Raspberry Pi? Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk> - 2016-01-26 10:50 +0100
csiph-web