Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #86105
| From | Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#1098661: linux: fails to boot on VisionFive 2: Unhandled exception: Store/AMO access fault |
| Date | 2025-02-23 22:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <KjrHX-1sBT-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <KiVyq-17Th-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <Kjr5f-1s8W-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <KjroB-1svi-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <KiVyq-17Th-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <KjroB-1svi-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 10:07:33PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2025-02-23 21:45, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 11:59:38AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > Starting with version 6.13.3-1~exp1, the riscv64 kernel is shipped as a > > > EFI binary with the payload compressed with zstd (using the EFI_ZBOOT > > > config option). In addition to breaking non-EFI systems, this change > > > simply prevents the kernel to boot on a VisionFive 2 board: > > Please re-assign to the bootloader package. > I disagree. The bootloader is u-boot and while it might be fixable at > this level, debian should be bootable on the original firmware. It needs to be fixed nevertheless. What do you mean with "original firmware"? What is this setup anyway? > BTW, you never explained the reason for your changes. It only brings > smaller kernel nothing more. And a working kernel is better than a > smaller kernel that does not work. Smaller images, so often faster load times. Feature parity between architectures. Fullfils the interface (U)EFI and works fine in edk2. As I currently try to assemble a list of all the interfaces the kernel fullfils: How would you define this? Running this in u-boot is not (U)EFI, but something more strict, or there is a bug in the kernel decompressor. Bastian -- Immortality consists largely of boredom. -- Zefrem Cochrane, "Metamorphosis", stardate 3219.8
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1098661: linux: fails to boot on VisionFive 2: Unhandled exception: Store/AMO access fault Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> - 2025-02-22 12:10 +0100
Bug#1098661: linux: fails to boot on VisionFive 2: Unhandled exception: Store/AMO access fault Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2025-02-23 22:30 +0100
Bug#1098661: linux: fails to boot on VisionFive 2: Unhandled exception: Store/AMO access fault Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> - 2025-02-23 22:50 +0100
Bug#1098661: linux: fails to boot on VisionFive 2: Unhandled exception: Store/AMO access fault Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2025-02-24 20:30 +0100
Bug#1098661: linux: fails to boot on VisionFive 2: Unhandled exception: Store/AMO access fault Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2025-02-24 22:40 +0100
Bug#1098661: linux: fails to boot on VisionFive 2: Unhandled exception: Store/AMO access fault "Diederik de Haas" <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2025-02-26 13:20 +0100
Processed: Re: Bug#1098661: linux: fails to boot on VisionFive 2: Unhandled exception: Store/AMO access fault "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2025-02-26 21:50 +0100
Bug#1098661: linux: fails to boot on VisionFive 2: Unhandled exception: Store/AMO access fault Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2025-02-26 21:50 +0100
Bug#1098661: fixed in linux 6.13.5-1~exp1 Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-02-28 21:20 +0100
csiph-web