Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #85375

Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds

From Sergei Golovan <sgolovan@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.ports.mips, linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds
Date 2025-02-04 10:10 +0100
Message-ID <Kcn6p-eidu-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <K5vBL-9kXj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <K6BYt-aaN8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Kamet-cUkD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <K5vBL-9kXj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Kamet-cUkD-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Hi!

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 10:45 PM Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@debian.org> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I agree this looks like the kernel is at least involved in this problem.
> Is someone able to do a bisect to help the kernel team to pinpoint the
> issue?
>
> Or does someone has a reproducer that also works for someone without
> mips64el hardware (probably something involving qemu)?

I've tried to reproduce the Erlang FTBFS in qemu (both on malta and
loongson-virt machines) and failed to do so.
Also, I've found a thread on linux-kernel mailing list, which might be
relevant (see [1]). It describes some EFAULT on
mips64 which were introduced roughly at the same time when Erlang
started to FTBFS. I've run the test they
suggested (on qemu on loongson-virt machine).

The test program is compiled using gcc-14 (14.2.0-16).

The test program aborts on kernels 6.1.0-29-loongson-3 (6.1.123-1) and
6.12.10-loongson-3 (6.12.10-1)

The test program does not abort on kernel 5.10.0-30-loongson-3 (5.10.218-1)

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/mvmplxraqmd.fsf@suse.de/T/

Cheers!
-- 
Sergei Golovan

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@debian.org> - 2025-01-29 20:50 +0100
  Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds Sergei Golovan <sgolovan@debian.org> - 2025-02-04 10:10 +0100
    mips64el in trixie: [was: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently  FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds] Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2025-02-16 21:20 +0100
      Re: mips64el in trixie: [was: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently  FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds] Sergei Golovan <sgolovan@debian.org> - 2025-02-16 21:40 +0100
      Re: mips64el in trixie: [was: Bug#1093200: Some packages  consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds] Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2025-02-25 15:20 +0100

csiph-web