Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1231709
| From | Sergei Golovan <sgolovan@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.ports.mips, linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds |
| Date | 2025-02-04 10:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <Kcn6p-eidu-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <K5vBL-9kXj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <K6BYt-aaN8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Kamet-cUkD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <K5vBL-9kXj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Kamet-cUkD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Hi! On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 10:45 PM Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@debian.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > I agree this looks like the kernel is at least involved in this problem. > Is someone able to do a bisect to help the kernel team to pinpoint the > issue? > > Or does someone has a reproducer that also works for someone without > mips64el hardware (probably something involving qemu)? I've tried to reproduce the Erlang FTBFS in qemu (both on malta and loongson-virt machines) and failed to do so. Also, I've found a thread on linux-kernel mailing list, which might be relevant (see [1]). It describes some EFAULT on mips64 which were introduced roughly at the same time when Erlang started to FTBFS. I've run the test they suggested (on qemu on loongson-virt machine). The test program is compiled using gcc-14 (14.2.0-16). The test program aborts on kernels 6.1.0-29-loongson-3 (6.1.123-1) and 6.12.10-loongson-3 (6.12.10-1) The test program does not abort on kernel 5.10.0-30-loongson-3 (5.10.218-1) [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/mvmplxraqmd.fsf@suse.de/T/ Cheers! -- Sergei Golovan
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@debian.org> - 2025-01-29 20:50 +0100
Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds Sergei Golovan <sgolovan@debian.org> - 2025-02-04 10:10 +0100
mips64el in trixie: [was: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds] Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2025-02-16 21:20 +0100
Re: mips64el in trixie: [was: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds] Sergei Golovan <sgolovan@debian.org> - 2025-02-16 21:40 +0100
Re: mips64el in trixie: [was: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds] Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2025-02-25 15:20 +0100
csiph-web