Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #83926

Handling next linux upload to unstable (was: Re: Uploading linux (6.10.7-1))

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.devel.release
Subject Handling next linux upload to unstable (was: Re: Uploading linux (6.10.7-1))
Date Fri, 13 Sep 2024 21:10:01 +0200
Message-ID <JmjQ5-c2Ol-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <Jhtn4-8Xaz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <JiDDH-9HUi-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <JiIN4-9LgQ-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <JiRdD-9QtM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JiRGF-9QSd-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>, Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-kernel-request@lists.debian.org Fri Sep 13 19:09:38 2024
Old-Return-Path <carnil@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-109.661 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.142, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Mail-Followup-To Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>, Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>, Debian kernel maintainers <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>, Debian release team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition inline
X-Debian-User carnil
X-Mailing-List <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/144396
List-ID <debian-kernel.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/ZuSN1PBChUSiR4Jz@eldamar.lan
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 58
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc Debian kernel maintainers <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>, Debian release team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date Fri, 13 Sep 2024 21:09:08 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <ZuSN1PBChUSiR4Jz@eldamar.lan>
X-Original-References <ZtLsL13PZ-6qIuBr@eldamar.lan> <20240903152838.bril7b37nqso5gox@mraw.org> <Ztd2-gt4tyuXAgdD@eldamar.lan> <20240904055140.6hsk7qrsoonfvz65@mraw.org> <Ztf94B57pt540ZWF@eldamar.lan>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.kernel:83926 linux.debian.devel.release:127230

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


Hi Cyril, Steve,

On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 08:27:44AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Cyril, Steve,
> 
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 07:51:40AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (2024-09-03):
> > > Right, this is sensible. We have currently the FTBFS for 6.10.7-1 for
> > > riscv64 and arm64 which needs to be sorted. We either can have this
> > > fixed isolated or do a 6.10.8-1 with the build failure fixes? Is this
> > > near enough timewise?
> > 
> > I don't have any preferences regarding a future wholesale 6.10.y or just
> > a new revision of the current upstream release. It'd probably just make
> > sense to avoid upgrading to 6.11.y since I'd guess we would get more
> > things to look at.
> 
> Yes, 6.11.y won't go to unstable anyway before 6.11 is released. So
> that will take still some weeks. That means for unstable we will
> continue following the 6.10.y series for now.
> 
> In any case Aurelien worked on the FTBFS issue:
> https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/1185
> 
> So we would be able to have either 6.10.7-2 or 6.10.8-1 at your
> preference.
> 
> Aiming though to make 6.11.y and once ready 6.12.y go timely to
> unstable as the later one is expected/likely the expected LTS version.
> 
> > I'll let Steve comment on the preferred timings.
> 
> Ack!

So we are now there. linux/6.10.9-1 should now be able to migrate to
testing, no major issues were reported so far, and I think you can let
it go either with a hint or automatically to testing.

In parallel I'm still working on importing other versions, 6.10.10 was
released and is ready packaging wise. But now I would like to further
coordinate with you.

Would it be now a good time for planned d-i changes, sho should I hold
back the 6.10.10-1 and later uploads? If so, could you give me (please
CC me so i do not miss it) a ping when it is again fine to do an
upload?

Please let me know, and if there is something else I blocking you from
my side.

Once 6.11 would be released and we know it's stabilised in
experimental we would like to move it to unstable and make the way
free in experimental for 6.12-rcX, as the later is in particular
important to make 6.12.y ready as this is expected to be the next LTS
upstream stable version and so the one aimed for trixie.

Regards,
Salvatore

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Uploading linux (6.10.7-1) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-08-31 12:20 +0200
  Re: Uploading linux (6.10.7-1) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-09-03 17:30 +0200
    Re: Uploading linux (6.10.7-1) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-09-03 23:00 +0200
      Re: Uploading linux (6.10.7-1) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-09-04 08:00 +0200
        Re: Uploading linux (6.10.7-1) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-09-04 08:30 +0200
          Handling next linux upload to unstable (was: Re: Uploading linux  (6.10.7-1)) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-09-13 21:10 +0200
            Re: Handling next linux upload to unstable Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-09-14 02:00 +0200
              Re: Handling next linux upload to unstable Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2024-09-14 18:30 +0200
                Re: Handling next linux upload to unstable Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-09-15 00:40 +0200
                Re: Handling next linux upload to unstable Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2024-09-15 22:30 +0200
                Re: Handling next linux upload to unstable Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-09-15 23:10 +0200
                Re: Handling next linux upload to unstable Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2024-09-15 23:30 +0200
                Re: Handling next linux upload to unstable Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-09-20 15:50 +0200
                Re: Handling next linux upload to unstable Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2024-09-22 11:20 +0200
                Re: Handling next linux upload to unstable Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-09-22 14:40 +0200
        Re: Uploading linux (6.10.7-1) Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2024-09-05 22:10 +0200

csiph-web