Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #83827

Re: Uploading linux (6.10.7-1)

From Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.devel.release
Subject Re: Uploading linux (6.10.7-1)
Date 2024-09-04 08:30 +0200
Message-ID <JiRGF-9QSd-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <Jhtn4-8Xaz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <JiDDH-9HUi-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <JiIN4-9LgQ-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <JiRdD-9QtM-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Cyril, Steve,

On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 07:51:40AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (2024-09-03):
> > Right, this is sensible. We have currently the FTBFS for 6.10.7-1 for
> > riscv64 and arm64 which needs to be sorted. We either can have this
> > fixed isolated or do a 6.10.8-1 with the build failure fixes? Is this
> > near enough timewise?
> 
> I don't have any preferences regarding a future wholesale 6.10.y or just
> a new revision of the current upstream release. It'd probably just make
> sense to avoid upgrading to 6.11.y since I'd guess we would get more
> things to look at.

Yes, 6.11.y won't go to unstable anyway before 6.11 is released. So
that will take still some weeks. That means for unstable we will
continue following the 6.10.y series for now.

In any case Aurelien worked on the FTBFS issue:
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/1185

So we would be able to have either 6.10.7-2 or 6.10.8-1 at your
preference.

Aiming though to make 6.11.y and once ready 6.12.y go timely to
unstable as the later one is expected/likely the expected LTS version.

> I'll let Steve comment on the preferred timings.

Ack!

Regards,
Salvatore

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Uploading linux (6.10.7-1) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-08-31 12:20 +0200
  Re: Uploading linux (6.10.7-1) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-09-03 17:30 +0200
    Re: Uploading linux (6.10.7-1) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-09-03 23:00 +0200
      Re: Uploading linux (6.10.7-1) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-09-04 08:00 +0200
        Re: Uploading linux (6.10.7-1) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-09-04 08:30 +0200
          Handling next linux upload to unstable (was: Re: Uploading linux  (6.10.7-1)) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-09-13 21:10 +0200
            Re: Handling next linux upload to unstable Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-09-14 02:00 +0200
              Re: Handling next linux upload to unstable Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2024-09-14 18:30 +0200
                Re: Handling next linux upload to unstable Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-09-15 00:40 +0200
                Re: Handling next linux upload to unstable Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2024-09-15 22:30 +0200
                Re: Handling next linux upload to unstable Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-09-15 23:10 +0200
                Re: Handling next linux upload to unstable Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2024-09-15 23:30 +0200
                Re: Handling next linux upload to unstable Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-09-20 15:50 +0200
                Re: Handling next linux upload to unstable Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2024-09-22 11:20 +0200
                Re: Handling next linux upload to unstable Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-09-22 14:40 +0200
        Re: Uploading linux (6.10.7-1) Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2024-09-05 22:10 +0200

csiph-web