Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #84920
| From | Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#1090811: please set linux-sysctl-defaults to Priority: important |
| Date | 2024-12-22 16:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <JWvKF-1AY7-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <JVslP-Vpe-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JVqtH-Ufp-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JVyAV-Z2y-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <JVqtH-Ufp-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JVyAV-Z2y-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Control: tags -1 + patch On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 03:52:55PM -0800, Tianon Gravi wrote: > > Regarding tasksel vs. Priority, the latter has a potential for a much > > wider impact: lots of Debian system are installed without d-i and/or > > tasksel, and most if not all would get the package via Priority. > (Think > > of all the tools building Debian images, chroots, containers, etc., on > > top of debootstrap/mmdebstrap/etc.) > > I'm not sure it's the case that most of those other systems install > Priority: standard. Debootstrap certainly doesn't by itself, and I > don't think the debuerreotype tool for building OCI images does either. > In any case, your point still stands. I'll re-assign this to general > for now, and we can discuss the options in a broader context. > > FWIW, we have added linux-sysctl-defaults to the sid/trixie VM images > built by the cloud team. > > noah > > I think "Priority: important" is probably appropriate here? > [2]https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debootstrap/-/blob/c019a546a37b9284f0503c955d0f198044a7e2f0/scripts/debian-common#L29 > Then it's installed by default in standard / d-i, but not part of minbase, > buildd, etc. > (It wouldn't affect/do anything in most container images or runtimes > anyhow, which is also an argument for it being harmless to include. 🤷) Hi kernel team. Per the earlier discussion in this bug, please raise the priority of linux-sysctl-defaults to important in order to ensure that it's present by default in typical Debian installations. Patch is attached. Thanks noah
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1090811: please set linux-sysctl-defaults to Priority: important Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org> - 2024-12-22 16:10 +0100
Processed: Re: Bug#1090811: please set linux-sysctl-defaults to Priority: important "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-12-22 16:10 +0100
Bug#1090811: please set linux-sysctl-defaults to Priority: important Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org> - 2024-12-22 16:40 +0100
Bug#1090811: please set linux-sysctl-defaults to Priority: important Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org> - 2024-12-22 16:50 +0100
Bug#1090811: please set linux-sysctl-defaults to Priority: important Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-01-01 07:20 +0100
Bug#1090811: please set linux-sysctl-defaults to Priority: important Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2025-01-01 13:10 +0100
Bug#1090811: please set linux-sysctl-defaults to Priority: important Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-01-01 14:10 +0100
csiph-web