Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #84411

Bug#1086503: The underlying request may be to add 32 bit equivalents of 64 bit caps where the feature is actually accessible from 32 bits

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.endofthelinebbs.com!news.corradoroberto.it!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Bastien Roucariès <rouca@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Bug#1086503: The underlying request may be to add 32 bit equivalents of 64 bit caps where the feature is actually accessible from 32 bits
Date Thu, 31 Oct 2024 13:50:02 +0100
Message-ID <JDCMF-5ErW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <JDBGV-5DPu-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To 1086503@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Thu Oct 31 12:42:07 2024
Old-Return-Path <debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org>
X-Spam-Flag NO
X-Spam-Score 0.201
Reply-To Bastien Roucariès <rouca@debian.org>, 1086503@bugs.debian.org
Resent-To debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-Cc Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
X-Debian-Pr-Message followup 1086503
X-Debian-Pr-Package src:linux
X-Debian-Pr-Keywords upstream
X-Debian-Pr-Source linux
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3984084.pmUHNcbEei"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Debian-User rouca
X-Debian-Message from BTS
X-Mailing-List <debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/1865940
List-ID <debian-bugs-dist.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-bugs-dist/>
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 39
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Thu, 31 Oct 2024 12:38:18 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID <14762772.WNb0TgdX5r@portable-bastien>
X-Original-References <9754604.pJD44thJ85@portable-bastien>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:1218551 linux.debian.kernel:84411

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi;

In order to be clear the underlying request is to add 32 bit equivalents of 64 bit caps where the feature is actually accessible from 32 bits and make sense

the second wave of crypto instructions (sha3, sha512) was not added to arm32

Bastien

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#1086503: linux: Please get HWCAP and HWCAP2 in sync between 32bits and 64bits architecture Bastien Roucariès <rouca@debian.org> - 2024-10-31 12:40 +0100
  Bug#1086503: The underlying request may be to add 32 bit equivalents of 64 bit caps where the feature is actually accessible from 32 bits Bastien Roucariès <rouca@debian.org> - 2024-10-31 13:50 +0100
    Bug#1086503: The underlying request may be to add 32 bit equivalents of 64 bit caps where the feature is actually accessible from 32 bits Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-11-03 22:00 +0100
    Bug#1086503: The underlying request may be to add 32 bit equivalents of 64 bit caps where the feature is actually accessible from 32 bits Bastien Roucariès <rouca@debian.org> - 2024-11-05 12:30 +0100
  Processed: Re: The underlying request may be to add 32 bit  equivalents of 64 bit caps where the feature is actually accessible from  32 bits "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-11-05 12:30 +0100

csiph-web