Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #84411
| From | Bastien Roucariès <rouca@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#1086503: The underlying request may be to add 32 bit equivalents of 64 bit caps where the feature is actually accessible from 32 bits |
| Date | 2024-10-31 13:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <JDCMF-5ErW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <JDBGV-5DPu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi; In order to be clear the underlying request is to add 32 bit equivalents of 64 bit caps where the feature is actually accessible from 32 bits and make sense the second wave of crypto instructions (sha3, sha512) was not added to arm32 Bastien
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1086503: linux: Please get HWCAP and HWCAP2 in sync between 32bits and 64bits architecture Bastien Roucariès <rouca@debian.org> - 2024-10-31 12:40 +0100
Bug#1086503: The underlying request may be to add 32 bit equivalents of 64 bit caps where the feature is actually accessible from 32 bits Bastien Roucariès <rouca@debian.org> - 2024-10-31 13:50 +0100
Bug#1086503: The underlying request may be to add 32 bit equivalents of 64 bit caps where the feature is actually accessible from 32 bits Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-11-03 22:00 +0100
Bug#1086503: The underlying request may be to add 32 bit equivalents of 64 bit caps where the feature is actually accessible from 32 bits Bastien Roucariès <rouca@debian.org> - 2024-11-05 12:30 +0100
Processed: Re: The underlying request may be to add 32 bit equivalents of 64 bit caps where the feature is actually accessible from 32 bits "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-11-05 12:30 +0100
csiph-web