Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #76402
| From | Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#1016092: please enable CONFIG_SENSORS_SHT3x |
| Date | 2022-09-30 17:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Fbqhj-b7Ac-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ENAUx-e2vR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ENAUx-e2vR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hello kernel team, can I get some feedback? Are there major reasons why it is not right to build more drivers? On Jul 27, Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it> wrote: > Source: linux > Version: 5.10.127-1 > Severity: wishlist > > Please enable CONFIG_SENSORS_SHT3x and CONFIG_SENSORS_SHT4x, because > they are commonly available high quality I2C thermometers used in many > DIY projects. > At least for armhf/arm64, which is the most common Linux architecture > used for electronic experimentation. > > The SHT15, SHT21 (which is actually enabled) and SHTC1 are much less > common and probably would not be missed much. > > For the same reason I would love to also have available: > CONFIG_SCD30_CORE > CONFIG_SCD4X > CONFIG_SENSIRION_SGP30 > CONFIG_SENSIRION_SGP40 > CONFIG_SPS30_I2C > CONFIG_SPS30_SERIAL > > -- > ciao, > Marco -- ciao, Marco
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1016092: please enable CONFIG_SENSORS_SHT3x Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it> - 2022-07-27 00:10 +0200
Bug#1016092: please enable CONFIG_SENSORS_SHT3x Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it> - 2022-09-30 17:40 +0200
Bug#1016092: please enable CONFIG_SENSORS_SHT3x Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-10-01 09:30 +0200
Bug#1016092: marked as done (please enable CONFIG_SENSORS_SHT3x) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2022-10-09 19:10 +0200
csiph-web