Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #76405
| From | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#1016092: please enable CONFIG_SENSORS_SHT3x |
| Date | 2022-10-01 09:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <FbF6F-bgAj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ENAUx-e2vR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ENAUx-e2vR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Fbqhj-b7Ac-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ENAUx-e2vR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Fbqhj-b7Ac-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Hi Marco, On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 05:36:08PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Hello kernel team, can I get some feedback? > Are there major reasons why it is not right to build more drivers? Enabled both CONFIG_SENSORS_SHT3x and CONFIG_SENSORS_SHT4x for the next upload to experimental, but though I have not touched the drivers/iio/chemical yet. We have not any enabled there afaics and I think this needs some discussion/input from Ben in particular. Enabling more drivers makes build time and size bigger so we have to take extra care on what is of actual benefit or what are cornercases. Hope this helps already, Regards, Salvatore
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1016092: please enable CONFIG_SENSORS_SHT3x Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it> - 2022-07-27 00:10 +0200
Bug#1016092: please enable CONFIG_SENSORS_SHT3x Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it> - 2022-09-30 17:40 +0200
Bug#1016092: please enable CONFIG_SENSORS_SHT3x Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-10-01 09:30 +0200
Bug#1016092: marked as done (please enable CONFIG_SENSORS_SHT3x) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2022-10-09 19:10 +0200
csiph-web