Bug#992184: marked as done (linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT be builtin?)

Path	csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	"Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.kernel
Subject	Bug#992184: marked as done (linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT be builtin?)
Date	Thu, 04 Nov 2021 10:10:03 +0100
Message-ID	<DfGUX-2OC-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<DfGUX-2OC-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <CMmbE-Q3-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-kernel-request@lists.debian.org Thu Nov 4 09:04:17 2021
Old-Return-Path	<debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-10.76 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DIGITS_LETTERS=1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD=0.02, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MD5_SHA1_SUM=-1, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, WORD_WITHOUT_VOWELS=1, YOURMESSAGEBOD=2.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Mailer	MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509)
X-Debian-Pr-Message	closed 992184
X-Debian-Pr-Package	src:linux
X-Debian-Pr-Keywords	patch
X-Debian-Pr-Source	linux
Reply-To	992184@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type	multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1636016605-6704-0"
X-Mailing-List	<debian-kernel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/132025
List-ID	<debian-kernel.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/handler.992184.D992184.16360164115371.ackdone@bugs.debian.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	362
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Thu, 04 Nov 2021 09:03:25 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID	<handler.992184.D992184.16360164115371.ackdone@bugs.debian.org>
X-Original-References	<E1miYbQ-000Hhx-IG@fasolo.debian.org> <2192428.WkaZTTdeNL@bagend>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.kernel:73596

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Your message dated Thu, 04 Nov 2021 09:00:08 +0000
with message-id <E1miYbQ-000Hhx-IG@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#992184: fixed in linux 5.15-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #992184,
regarding linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT be builtin?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
992184: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992184
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#992184: linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT be builtin? Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2021-08-15 13:10 +0200
  Bug#992184: #992184 linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT be builtin? Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2021-09-14 08:30 +0200
    Bug#992184: #992184 linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT be builtin? Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2021-09-24 01:40 +0200
  Processed: Re: #992184 linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT  be builtin? "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2021-09-14 08:30 +0200
  Processed: Re: #992184 linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT  be builtin? "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2021-09-24 01:40 +0200
  Bug#992184: marked as done (linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT  be builtin?) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2021-11-04 10:10 +0100

csiph-web