Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #69388

Re: Which package is responsible for setting rlimits?

Path csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.devel, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Re: Which package is responsible for setting rlimits?
Date Mon, 01 Feb 2021 15:30:02 +0100
Message-ID <BDInf-8cK-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <BDHUd-7NU-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org Mon Feb 1 14:27:40 2021
Old-Return-Path <smcv@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-9.501 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=smtpauto.master; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=deIsXrUP/PQQhp9O33FInb/vKZfcCSdFb2NxC0wuHBw=; b=asb6nMXsnxx+X4hQrAUtPNULbj WvMMVJs8VNUQaABKz5aysXqKDF5RxUuqPclDsxuMgJ6aUv0kgjWM0Xcl2JfKzIldzCz8JHGhkenba Zn6ZOXNfoPfEP7nS43nZbdMYeYj9UGXTDc+2XGfbJ8fp2gPuXj9x+lETl6jobL4JNg6B3XDnMNkL2 D+vyrxrcPiZhblOH2uY4jai/BRmFSnpnEQ4OnlUq48QgYGXDLbG+Q6ssL0hZeuzNjMAOzPtiNFal/ Dk0mnWmE6C7n2+ACCdVbiBJDBYA5VeAMTB+Yds8tWxmeAMPBrsE8q2dnZ3yrVQoHsxqtDvCHPyfoE nBIwIfuw==;
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition inline
X-Mailing-List <debian-devel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/347003
List-ID <debian-devel.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/YBgPyYOoNYy8jVBj@momentum.pseudorandom.co.uk
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 10
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc pam@packages.debian.org, systemd@packages.debian.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:27:21 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID <YBgPyYOoNYy8jVBj@momentum.pseudorandom.co.uk>
X-Original-References <YBgJIUVs/IeDgUYR@momentum.pseudorandom.co.uk>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.devel:99391 linux.debian.kernel:69388

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


On Mon, 01 Feb 2021 at 13:58:57 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Rationale: on sysvinit or runit systems, pid 1 is very simple and is
> unlikely to need to elevate any limits, but sysadmins are expected
> to restart system services in an unpredictable execution environment
> (certainly true for systemd, I'm not so sure for runit).

Sorry, that should of course read: "certainly true for *sysvinit*,
I'm not so sure for runit".

    smcv

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Which package is responsible for setting rlimits? Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2021-02-01 15:00 +0100
  Re: Which package is responsible for setting rlimits? Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2021-02-01 15:30 +0100
  Re: Which package is responsible for setting rlimits? Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2021-02-01 17:50 +0100
    Re: Which package is responsible for setting rlimits? Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2021-02-01 18:30 +0100
      Re: Which package is responsible for setting rlimits? Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2021-02-01 18:40 +0100

csiph-web