Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #69394
| From | Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Which package is responsible for setting rlimits? |
| Date | 2021-02-01 18:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BDLbs-1sy-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <BDHUd-7NU-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <BDKyJ-ZP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Mon, 01 Feb 2021 at 11:49:25 -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Simon" == Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> writes:
> I'm assuming that the proposal is to change this for bookworm.
I'm sorry, I don't have a concrete proposal, and I don't understand which
package is meant to be responsible for this well enough to write one.
At the moment, glib2.0 is in a position where a recent change caused
regressions for some system configurations, but if I revert the change,
then I'm undoing security hardening. I don't like either of those options,
and I'm hoping there is a better way.
smcv
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Which package is responsible for setting rlimits? Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2021-02-01 15:00 +0100
Re: Which package is responsible for setting rlimits? Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2021-02-01 15:30 +0100
Re: Which package is responsible for setting rlimits? Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2021-02-01 17:50 +0100
Re: Which package is responsible for setting rlimits? Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2021-02-01 18:30 +0100
Re: Which package is responsible for setting rlimits? Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2021-02-01 18:40 +0100
csiph-web