Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.rc > #383490 > unrolled thread

Bug#1091292: asymptote: FTBFS on armhf: make[4]: *** [Makefile:14: hatch.png] Error 1

Started byHilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
First post2025-02-03 23:40 +0100
Last post2025-02-03 23:40 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.rc

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Bug#1091292: asymptote: FTBFS on armhf: make[4]: *** [Makefile:14: hatch.png] Error 1 Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> - 2025-02-03 23:40 +0100

#383490 — Bug#1091292: asymptote: FTBFS on armhf: make[4]: *** [Makefile:14: hatch.png] Error 1

FromHilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
Date2025-02-03 23:40 +0100
SubjectBug#1091292: asymptote: FTBFS on armhf: make[4]: *** [Makefile:14: hatch.png] Error 1
Message-ID<KcdgJ-ebGo-7@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 23.12.24 Hilmar Preusse (hille42@web.de) wrote:
> On 23.12.24 Lucas Nussbaum (lucas@debian.org) wrote:

Hi Lucas,

> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to
> > build on armhf.
> > 
> > This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so this is a
> > regression.  Also, there are no known issues on amd64 or arm64
> > according to recent (a couple days ago) rebuilds.
> > 
> 
> This seems to be caused by #1085120, although the bug is for armel.
> The phenomena are about the same. I mark this bug as blocked by the
> other and wait for gs 10.00.05 .
> 

Currently gs 10.00.05 does not exists and even if it will be released
tomorrow, I have doubt that it will make it into trixie.

Would it be allowed to simply drop the architechtures in question for
trixie and re-include it later?

Hilmar

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.rc


csiph-web