Bug#1091292: asymptote: FTBFS on armhf: make[4]: *** [Makefile:14: hatch.png] Error 1

From	Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.rc
Subject	Bug#1091292: asymptote: FTBFS on armhf: make[4]: *** [Makefile:14: hatch.png] Error 1
Date	2025-02-03 23:40 +0100
Message-ID	<KcdgJ-ebGo-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<JWV2q-1QVs-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <JWV2q-1QVs-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <JWX4d-1S9a-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <JWV2q-1QVs-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <JWX4d-1S9a-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 23.12.24 Hilmar Preusse (hille42@web.de) wrote:
> On 23.12.24 Lucas Nussbaum (lucas@debian.org) wrote:

Hi Lucas,

> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to
> > build on armhf.
> > 
> > This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so this is a
> > regression.  Also, there are no known issues on amd64 or arm64
> > according to recent (a couple days ago) rebuilds.
> > 
> 
> This seems to be caused by #1085120, although the bug is for armel.
> The phenomena are about the same. I mark this bug as blocked by the
> other and wait for gs 10.00.05 .
> 

Currently gs 10.00.05 does not exists and even if it will be released
tomorrow, I have doubt that it will make it into trixie.

Would it be allowed to simply drop the architechtures in question for
trixie and re-include it later?

Hilmar

Back to linux.debian.bugs.rc | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#1091292: asymptote: FTBFS on armhf: make[4]: *** [Makefile:14: hatch.png] Error 1 Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> - 2025-02-03 23:40 +0100

csiph-web