Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #981263
| From | Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#943712: propose to drop libcblas.so |
| Date | 2019-10-28 15:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <yWe2d-2LM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <yWdIS-2j9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <yWdIS-2j9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Debian |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi Lumin, Le lundi 28 octobre 2019 à 06:50 -0700, Mo Zhou a écrit : > Package: libatlas3-base > Version: 3.10.3-8 > Severity: normal > I propose to remove the libcblas.so in order to avoid trapping > more maintainer into the performance problem. > > See the MBF bug: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2019/10/msg00273.html > > > If you agree with that, I'll continue with the MBF. Those > filed bugs would be the blockers for this bug. I have no objection per se to removing this library, but it may introduce problems. Essentially the thing is that some packages (I don't remember which) have a hard dependency on ATLAS, and in that case they don't use our libblas.so, but rather they use libatlas.so + libcblas.so. And since CBLAS is not included in libatlas (IIRC), they really need libcblas.so. So I think the first step is to verify whether such packages are really in that situation, and then to make a decision. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://www.debian.org
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#943712: propose to drop libcblas.so Mo Zhou <lumin@debian.org> - 2019-10-28 15:00 +0100 Bug#943712: propose to drop libcblas.so Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> - 2019-10-28 15:20 +0100
csiph-web