Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > it.comp.retrocomputing > #46968
| From | Peter Dassow <z80eu@arcor.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | it.comp.retrocomputing, comp.os.cpm |
| Subject | Re: possibile che Gene Roddenberry usasse computer cosi' custom ?? |
| Date | 2016-01-11 21:50 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <n714dm$vmh$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <1f54d2a2-767d-430e-b969-1509a9a3d671@googlegroups.com> <69b61bd3-38aa-4799-8b97-68b0ae19032c@googlegroups.com> <n6mkta$32t$1@dont-email.me> <n6mqbi$1ue$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 07.01.2016 at 23:54 CPMDude wrote: >> > > Wow - 3 *months* to reverse-engineer the CP/M disk format? That doesn't > say much for the technical competency of the DriveSavers crew. They had > the machine that created the disks right in front of them!!! Exactly what I've thought about. If they can't read the letters of the type label/plate they just had to use Google image search to know what machine was used for writing the disks. > So what if it didn't power up - forgetting the fact that restoring the > machine to operation was probably no more difficult than replacing a few > caps, all they had to do was pull the CP/M boot ROM, read it, and they > would have had the disk format details right there in front of them in > under an hour. Still too hard? Sit down in front of their Windoze > laptop with a cup of coffee and surf around the many online computer > museums until they find a matching picture of the machine in question. I > guess that's the limit of today's 'technical' expertise. > These "professionals" had to search for a vintage PC, boot MS-DOS, use 22disk, choose the right format, copy the files. If the vintage PC didn't had already USB interfaces, they might use a parallel port ZIP drive for the vintage PC, and a more modern USB powered ZIP drive for a modern PC, to get the files finally back. It was clearly a rip-off.
Back to it.comp.retrocomputing | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
possibile che Gene Roddenberry usasse computer cosi' custom ?? scap61 <scap6161@yahoo.it> - 2016-01-05 01:12 -0800
Re: possibile che Gene Roddenberry usasse computer cosi' custom ?? mr <m.ridoni@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 01:01 -0800
Re: possibile che Gene Roddenberry usasse computer cosi' custom ?? francesco.messineo@gmail.com - 2016-01-06 10:55 -0800
Re: possibile che Gene Roddenberry usasse computer cosi' custom ?? scap61 <scap6161@yahoo.it> - 2016-01-06 12:04 -0800
Re: possibile che Gene Roddenberry usasse computer cosi' custom ?? mr <m.ridoni@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 06:43 -0800
Re: possibile che Gene Roddenberry usasse computer cosi' custom ?? francesco.messineo@gmail.com - 2016-01-07 08:12 -0800
Re: possibile che Gene Roddenberry usasse computer cosi' custom ?? mr <m.ridoni@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 08:18 -0800
Re: possibile che Gene Roddenberry usasse computer cosi' custom ?? francesco.messineo@gmail.com - 2016-01-07 08:12 -0800
Re: possibile che Gene Roddenberry usasse computer cosi' custom ?? test <test_is_invalid_mail@gmail.com> - 2016-01-15 08:30 +0000
Re: possibile che Gene Roddenberry usasse computer cosi' custom ?? "dott.Piergiorgio" <chiedetemelo@ask.me> - 2016-01-07 22:26 +0100
Re: possibile che Gene Roddenberry usasse computer cosi' custom ?? CPMDude <nospam@somewhere.net> - 2016-01-07 14:54 -0800
Re: possibile che Gene Roddenberry usasse computer cosi' custom ?? "Geoff Barnard" <geoff@jgb17.co.uk> - 2016-01-08 01:10 +0000
Re: possibile che Gene Roddenberry usasse computer cosi' custom ?? CPMDude <nospam@somewhere.net> - 2016-01-08 00:28 -0800
Re: possibile che Gene Roddenberry usasse computer cosi' custom ?? "dott.Piergiorgio" <chiedetemelo@ask.me> - 2016-01-11 12:27 +0100
Re: possibile che Gene Roddenberry usasse computer cosi' custom ?? Peter Dassow <z80eu@arcor.de> - 2016-01-11 21:50 +0100
csiph-web