Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > ger.ct > #584664 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-02-16 12:39 +0100 |
| Last post | 2023-02-16 18:52 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to ger.ct
Follow the science! Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2023-02-16 12:39 +0100
Re: Follow the science! Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2023-02-16 18:52 +0100
| From | Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-16 12:39 +0100 |
| Subject | Follow the science! |
| Message-ID | <tsl4ku$36mrc$2@dont-email.me> |
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/02/14/words-male-female-should-banned-science-enforce-idea-sex-binary/ | The words “male” and “female” should be phased out in science because | they reinforce ideas that sex is binary, scientists have suggested. | | Researchers studying ecology and evolutionary biology should be | encouraged to use terms such as “sperm-producing” or “egg producing” | or “XY/XX individual” to avoid “emphasising hetero-normative views”, | experts say. | | Other words and terms deemed problematic include man, woman, mother, | father, primitive, advanced, alien, invasive, exotic, non-native and | race. | | The terms were gathered as part of the EEB (Ecology and Evolutionary | Biology) Language Project, founded by a collaboration of scientists in | the US and Canada who claim some terminology is not inclusive, and | could be harmful. | | Even one of the most famous scientific concepts of all time, the | “survival of the fittest”, should no longer be used because it | discriminates against people with disabilities and is linked to | eugenics, they advise. -- German Dream: Vom Tellerwäscher zum Tellerwaschenden.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-16 18:52 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k578rkF19rbU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #584664 |
Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> writes: > https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/02/14/words-male-female-should-banned-science-enforce-idea-sex-binary/ > > | The words “male” and “female” should be phased out in science because > | they reinforce ideas that sex is binary, scientists have suggested. > | > | Researchers studying ecology and evolutionary biology should be > | encouraged to use terms such as “sperm-producing” or “egg producing” > | or “XY/XX individual” to avoid “emphasising hetero-normative views”, > | experts say. > | > | Other words and terms deemed problematic include man, woman, mother, > | father, primitive, advanced, alien, invasive, exotic, non-native and > | race. > | > | The terms were gathered as part of the EEB (Ecology and Evolutionary > | Biology) Language Project, founded by a collaboration of scientists in > | the US and Canada who claim some terminology is not inclusive, and > | could be harmful. > | > | Even one of the most famous scientific concepts of all time, the > | “survival of the fittest”, should no longer be used because it > | discriminates against people with disabilities and is linked to > | eugenics, they advise. Mein Vorschlag dazu: 25 auf die nackten Fußsohlen. Nackt darf man doch noch sagen?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | ger.ct
csiph-web