Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Dr. Joachim Neudert <neudert@5sl.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | ger.ct |
| Subject | Re: Johnson & Johnson |
| Date | 2021-06-04 14:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <s9ddfo$9m8$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <s9d6vn$o2a$10@tota-refugium.de> <20210604145502.5914c2c4.dietz-usenet@rotfl.franken.de> <s9d8ht$o2a$11@tota-refugium.de> <20210604155744.33b47f0f.dietz-usenet@rotfl.franken.de> <ihurdfFmh7gU1@mid.individual.net> |
Hermann Riemann <nospam.ng@hermann-riemann.de> wrote: > Am 04.06.21 um 15:57 schrieb Dietz Proepper: > > > Nicht ganz. > > Die Dauer des Impfschutzes und die Verteilung der Impfdaten > dürften erheblich vom Alter abhängen. > > Und vielleicht auch vom Impfstoff. > > Hermann > immer noch misstrauisch gegen Sputnik > trotz Söders Empfehlung. > Kein Problem. Die konnten bis heute nur 16 Millionen Dosen aus Russland exportieren. -- please forgive my iPhone typos
Back to ger.ct | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Johnson & Johnson Shinji Ikari <shinji@gmx.net> - 2021-06-03 21:43 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmx.de> - 2021-06-03 22:39 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Shinji Ikari <shinji@gmx.net> - 2021-06-04 11:50 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Shinji Ikari <shinji@gmx.net> - 2021-06-04 11:41 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2021-06-04 11:52 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Shinji Ikari <shinji@gmx.net> - 2021-06-04 14:21 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmx.de> - 2021-06-04 14:40 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Dietz Proepper <dietz-usenet@rotfl.franken.de> - 2021-06-04 14:55 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmx.de> - 2021-06-04 15:06 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Dietz Proepper <dietz-usenet@rotfl.franken.de> - 2021-06-04 15:57 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Hermann Riemann <nospam.ng@hermann-riemann.de> - 2021-06-04 16:24 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Dr. Joachim Neudert <neudert@5sl.org> - 2021-06-04 14:31 +0000
Re: Johnson & Johnson Hermann Riemann <nospam.ng@hermann-riemann.de> - 2021-06-04 16:43 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Dietz Proepper <dietz-usenet@rotfl.franken.de> - 2021-06-05 12:36 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmx.de> - 2021-06-04 17:35 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Dietz Proepper <dietz-usenet@rotfl.franken.de> - 2021-06-05 12:46 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmx.de> - 2021-06-05 13:09 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Dietz Proepper <dietz-usenet@rotfl.franken.de> - 2021-06-05 13:16 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmx.de> - 2021-06-05 13:30 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Shinji Ikari <shinji@gmx.net> - 2021-06-04 16:07 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Peter Veith <veith@snafu.de> - 2021-06-04 16:34 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2021-06-04 17:56 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Peter Veith <veith@snafu.de> - 2021-06-04 18:39 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2021-06-04 18:58 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Peter Veith <veith@snafu.de> - 2021-06-04 19:13 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmx.de> - 2021-06-04 19:24 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2021-06-04 20:12 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmx.de> - 2021-06-04 20:22 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmx.de> - 2021-06-04 20:25 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2021-06-07 10:56 -0700
Re: Johnson & Johnson Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmx.de> - 2021-06-07 20:48 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Ruediger Lahl <ruediger.lahl@gmx.de> - 2021-06-08 06:53 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmx.de> - 2021-06-08 09:04 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2021-06-08 09:21 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2021-06-08 09:34 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2021-06-08 09:39 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmx.de> - 2021-06-08 10:06 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2021-06-08 10:17 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmx.de> - 2021-06-08 10:51 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2021-06-08 10:59 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2021-06-08 02:17 -0700
Re: Johnson & Johnson Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2021-06-08 02:11 -0700
Re: Johnson & Johnson Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2021-06-08 11:06 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2021-06-08 11:14 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2021-06-08 02:20 -0700
Re: Johnson & Johnson Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2021-06-08 16:09 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2021-06-08 16:29 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Ruediger Lahl <ruediger.lahl@gmx.de> - 2021-06-08 09:13 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Jörg Tewes <jogi1964@gmx.net> - 2021-06-05 00:28 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmx.de> - 2021-06-05 10:38 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2021-06-05 10:52 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Peter Veith <veith@snafu.de> - 2021-06-04 22:04 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmx.de> - 2021-06-04 22:44 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2021-06-04 13:59 -0700
Re: Johnson & Johnson Peter Veith <veith@snafu.de> - 2021-06-04 23:21 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmx.de> - 2021-06-05 10:32 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Peter Veith <veith@snafu.de> - 2021-06-06 17:21 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Peter Veith <veith@snafu.de> - 2021-06-06 14:16 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Hermann Riemann <nospam.ng@hermann-riemann.de> - 2021-06-06 14:38 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmx.de> - 2021-06-06 14:49 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2021-06-06 14:50 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Peter Veith <veith@snafu.de> - 2021-06-06 15:36 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2021-06-06 15:56 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Peter Veith <veith@snafu.de> - 2021-06-06 18:15 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2021-06-05 14:37 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2021-06-04 12:02 -0700
Re: Johnson & Johnson Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmx.de> - 2021-06-04 21:24 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2021-06-04 12:38 -0700
Re: Johnson & Johnson Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2021-06-04 11:57 -0700
Re: Johnson & Johnson Peter Veith <veith@snafu.de> - 2021-06-04 22:10 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2021-06-04 22:15 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Peter Veith <veith@snafu.de> - 2021-06-04 23:22 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2021-06-04 23:29 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2021-06-06 17:31 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Peter Veith <veith@snafu.de> - 2021-06-06 14:17 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2021-06-06 08:50 -0700
Re: Johnson & Johnson Michael Zink <michael@swamp.franken.de> - 2021-06-04 12:54 +0200
Re: Johnson & Johnson Shinji Ikari <shinji@gmx.net> - 2021-06-04 14:23 +0200
csiph-web