Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > de.sci.mathematik > #143934

Kurzweils prognostic failure [Nabokov Fallacy] (Re: Math has found a new Muse [Grothendieck Hodges])

From Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups de.sci.mathematik
Subject Kurzweils prognostic failure [Nabokov Fallacy] (Re: Math has found a new Muse [Grothendieck Hodges])
Date 2026-09-12 12:14 +0200
Message-ID <11838md$2i6f$4@solani.org> (permalink)
References <1181i5f$3de6$4@solani.org> <1183609$2g5m$3@solani.org>

Show all headers | View raw


Hi,

I guess Kurzweils transhumanism is also not
on the list of the low hanging fruits of AI.
Moreover this turns out to be a fallacy:

"The cradle rocks above an abyss, a
nd common sense tells us that our existence
is but a brief crack of light between
two eternities of darkness."
— Speak, Memory, the opening line

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speak,_Memory

What if AI is the new torch of light of science,
and it doesn't have to constantly fear that
after Terrence Tao is dead, a new Terrence Tao

is born. LLMs kissed by Mnemosyne just live in
data centers and copy themselve from generation
and to generation until ethernity.

LoL

Bye

Mild Shock schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> Ever noticed that remaining unsolved conjectures,
> are difficult to decipher:
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hodge_conjecture
> 
> Although Grothendiek claimes it is part of
> his yoga on motivic rationality.
> 
> The dilemma is Humans cannot do math anymore
> on that level. And AI math on the level tends
> to be not understandable by humans anymore. So
> its as if math has found a new muse.
> 
> The new Muse is AI. I think proving math conjectures
> is the more low hanging fruit than colonizing
> Mars. But the result of this endeavours is a
> shocked public, now in total freeze.
> 
> Bye
> 
> Mild Shock schrieb:
>  > Hi,
>  >
>  > Disclaimer: I don't know what I am talking
>  > about. But I like the vibe behind connecting
>  > topics. So here we go:
>  >
>  > How it started:
>  >
>  > Gabriels Horn
>  > Gabriel's horn, also called Torricelli's trumpet,
>  > is the surface of revolution of the function y=1/x
>  > about the x-axis for x>=1. It has infinite
>  > surface area but finite volume.
>  > https://mathworld.wolfram.com/GabrielsHorn.html
>  >
>  > How its going:
>  >
>  > FINITE TIME BLOWUP FOR NAVIER–STOKES
>  > or every positive viscosity, we construct a solution
>  > of the three-dimensional incompressible Navier–Stokes
>  > equations that starts from rest and develops unbounded
>  > velocity in finite time while maintaining uniformly
>  > bounded kinetic energy
>  > 
> https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/32d9f210-8b73-45e0-91bc-82a30aef8a9a/navier-stokes.pdf 
> 
>  >
>  > Hava Fun everbody!
>  >
>  > Bye

Back to de.sci.mathematik | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Harmonic Analysis collides with Gabriels Horn [9-11 Math Incident] Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-09-11 20:43 +0200
  Math has found a new Muse [Grothendieck Hodges] (Re: Harmonic Analysis collides with Gabriels Horn) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-09-12 11:28 +0200
    Kurzweils prognostic failure [Nabokov Fallacy] (Re: Math has found a new Muse [Grothendieck Hodges]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-09-12 12:14 +0200

csiph-web