Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.sinclair > #4180
| From | "Brian Gaff" <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.sinclair |
| Subject | Re: Reliability and clongevity? |
| Date | 2016-06-01 09:42 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nim76b$bnm$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <nijhur$gi3$1@dont-email.me> <nijs4n$hvl$1@dont-email.me> |
Yes, but from the point of view of a purist or a museum specimen, alterations are not really on, so the ram board, different membrane and poking holes etc in the case are a non no, I guess you would need 2, one that is working and one that is original. One thing I did notices was that all the interface 1's I had no longer worked. the drives spin and nothing happens. Not sure if I have any left now. As for the gate arrays on the Amstrad, I had to get somebody to change a couple of those and it was quite a pain. Brian -- ----- - This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from... The Sofa of Brian Gaff... briang1@blueyonder.co.uk Blind user, so no pictures please! "Guesser" <alistair@zxnet.co.uk> wrote in message news:nijs4n$hvl$1@dont-email.me... > Hi Brian, > There's quite a large cottage industry which has grown up around keeping > speccies going these days. Until recently the only thing that couldn't be > replaced was the ULA, but there's now a complete drop in replacement based > on a modern CPLD available for the 16K/48K. A 128/+2 ULA has been > completed and should be available shortly. I don't believe there's any > chance of anything similar for the Amstrad gate array unfortunately unless > the economies of chip-on-board change just because of the physical > constraints. > There have been plug in RAM module boards available for some time which > replace the fragile and obsolete DRAM chips with 5 volt SRAM. > > As for UHF tuners disappearing on TVs a lot of people modify their speccy > for a composite output anyway or use RGB cables on the 128k machines as > the picture is so much better. Beyond analogue inputs disappearing > completely there are also people using analogue video to HDMI converters > with success, both composite and analogue RGB. > > People displaying a 4:3 signal on a widescreen telly is a particular bug > bear of mine. TVs are perfectly capable of using the correct aspect ratio > and it just means setting it up properly. In the case of using the SCART > input it can be set automatically by a suitably wired cable. > > > > On 31/05/2016 09:28, Brian Gaff wrote: >> I was just wondering what people are finding with real Speccies as per >> the >> degeneration of chips and other specific components. are there any >> problems >> which will, in the end mean no real machines will still be working. >> Obviously there is the keyboard membranes which are now mostly made from >> other materials than the originals were, but I was thinking about ulas, >> modulators and components made obsolete by time? >> I suppose in the end tvs with analogue tuners will be gone, and then we >> have issues with either modifying to use other inputs or hacking the >> output >> in some way. >> >> Also how do modern tvs cope with the new wide screen systems? >> >> >> Brian >> >
Back to comp.sys.sinclair | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Reliability and clongevity? "Brian Gaff" <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2016-05-31 09:28 +0100
Re: Reliability and clongevity? Guesser <alistair@zxnet.co.uk> - 2016-05-31 12:21 +0100
Re: Reliability and clongevity? "Brian Gaff" <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2016-06-01 09:42 +0100
Re: Reliability and clongevity? Duncan Snowden <duncan_s@talktalk.net> - 2016-06-01 16:51 +0100
Re: Reliability and clongevity? Guesser <alistair@zxnet.co.uk> - 2016-06-01 17:14 +0100
Re: Reliability and clongevity? "Chris" <chris.usenet@mail-filter.com> - 2016-06-02 00:59 +0100
Re: Reliability and clongevity? Volker Bartheld <news2016@bartheld.net> - 2016-06-01 07:58 +0200
Re: Reliability and clongevity? "Brian Gaff" <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2016-06-02 19:43 +0100
Re: Reliability and clongevity? lee.jtcltd@gmail.com - 2016-08-02 07:38 -0700
csiph-web