Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.sinclair > #4073

Re: The C64 is crap!

From Andreas Kohlbach <janrat.9.ankman@spamgourmet.net>
Newsgroups comp.sys.cbm, comp.sys.sinclair
Subject Re: The C64 is crap!
Followup-To comp.sys.cbm
Date 2016-01-21 18:05 -0500
Organization albasani.net
Message-ID <8760ymwn1k.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> (permalink)
References <n73r6p$rkd$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jfi.56A14E27.42.fortytwo@xs4all.nl>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Followups directed to: comp.sys.cbm

Show all headers | View raw


Jan van den Broek wrote on 21. January 2016:
>
> Tue, 12 Jan 2016 22:28:50 +0100
> "Harald Habenichts" <po@p.o> schrieb:
>>The Spectrum has much better graphics and better games! 
>
> Ah yes, the annual cross-posting flame-bait. Good.
>
> (Next time try to be a bit more original and start an 
> "VIC-20 vs ZX-81"-thread)

What about Atari 8bit (400, 800 and so on) VS Commodore 64? ;-)

The C64 and Amiga were the only "home computers" I owned. Now and then I
try to emulate computers I never had, never even heard of until now. When
I tried the Atari 800 and loaded VisiCalc (went down to some serious
business ;-) I noticed it would boot from the disk after power-on. Is
that true that the Atari did this or just a convenient feature of the
emulator? For the C64 you had to load any program manually.
-- 
Andreas

I use a Unix based operating system, which means I get laid almost as often
as I have to reboot my computer.

Back to comp.sys.sinclair | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The C64 is crap! "Harald Habenichts" <po@p.o> - 2016-01-12 22:28 +0100
  Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-13 13:17 +1300
  Re: The C64 is crap! AndyW <Andy@nojunqmail.com> - 2016-01-13 07:32 +0000
    Re: The C64 is crap! "Brian-Gaff" <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2016-01-14 08:36 +0000
  Re: The C64 is crap! Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2016-01-13 10:09 +0100
    Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-14 13:42 +1300
    Re: The C64 is crap! "Brian-Gaff" <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2016-01-14 08:37 +0000
  Re: The C64 is crap! Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2016-01-14 06:10 +0800
  Re: The C64 is crap! "Brian-Gaff" <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2016-01-14 08:35 +0000
    Re: The C64 is crap! Guesser <alistair@zxnet.co.uk> - 2016-01-14 15:24 +0000
  Re: The C64 is crap! Jan van den Broek <fortytwo@xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-21 22:31 +0100
    Re: The C64 is crap! Andreas Kohlbach <janrat.9.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2016-01-21 18:05 -0500

csiph-web