Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #132983 > unrolled thread
| Started by | JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-06-27 16:49 -0400 |
| Last post | 2020-07-04 20:31 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 519 — 32 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-06-27 16:49 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-06-27 17:07 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-27 22:33 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-28 02:45 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-06-27 17:19 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-06-27 17:48 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-06-27 17:53 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-27 22:35 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-01 15:09 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-01 11:02 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2020-06-27 18:02 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-27 22:36 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2020-06-28 06:22 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-28 16:26 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-03 03:51 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-02 20:58 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-03 02:31 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-03 11:19 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-03 08:29 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 04:06 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-03 21:13 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2020-07-04 01:56 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 00:02 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2020-07-04 03:49 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 01:13 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-04 12:50 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 16:24 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 09:41 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2020-07-04 14:01 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-04 14:07 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 18:35 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-07-04 15:16 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-04 17:08 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-04 07:23 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-04 11:03 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 16:08 +0000
Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 09:16 -0700
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2020-07-04 15:19 -0400
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 19:36 +0000
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-04 21:07 +0000
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 14:11 -0700
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-05 03:18 +0000
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-05 04:02 +0000
Arlen is utterly unmoved by facts Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 21:48 -0700
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-04 15:47 -0400
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 14:07 -0700
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-04 17:12 -0400
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 14:15 -0700
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-04 17:22 -0400
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2020-07-04 16:25 -0500
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 14:41 -0700
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 21:45 +0000
Arlen makes yet another explicit claim... (wasRe: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs You know who! <no@body.net> - 2020-07-04 14:49 -0700
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-05 03:14 +0000
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-09 18:34 -0700
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-09 21:52 -0400
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-10 02:56 +0000
Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-09 20:38 -0700
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-11 15:24 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-10 23:35 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-11 04:24 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-11 04:36 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-11 10:40 -0700
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-12 12:55 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-12 01:10 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-11 22:36 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-12 04:17 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-13 16:16 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-13 05:43 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-13 21:55 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs delvon daily <delvondaily@example.com> - 2020-07-13 14:37 -0700
OT: Why must Arlen nymshift? (was Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-13 15:13 -0700
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-14 16:07 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-14 01:22 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-14 21:12 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-14 19:27 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-15 11:59 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-14 22:54 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-16 16:37 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-16 18:10 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-17 13:29 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-16 21:45 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-18 22:14 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-18 11:50 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-19 16:07 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-19 08:17 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2020-07-19 14:34 +0200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-20 16:49 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 11:31 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-22 12:47 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 21:02 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-17 06:41 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-18 22:15 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-18 11:50 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-19 16:11 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-19 08:17 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-20 16:51 +1200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 11:31 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-18 07:18 -0700
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-18 11:50 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2020-07-18 21:47 +0200
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-11 04:51 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs John Michael <tonymayo43@gmail.com> - 2020-07-11 01:30 -0400
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-11 05:55 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-11 05:59 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-14 10:11 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-15 17:14 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: xxxxx is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-18 08:37 -0700
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: xxxxx is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-18 18:31 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: xxxxx is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-18 21:01 +0000
Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: xxxxx is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-18 20:54 +0000
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-10 15:21 +1200
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-09 20:30 -0700
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-09 23:36 -0400
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-09 20:42 -0700
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-10 15:44 +1200
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-10 04:18 +0000
Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs For a friend <notyou@yes.yes> - 2020-07-09 21:35 -0700
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2020-07-10 01:04 -0400
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-09 22:06 -0700
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2020-07-10 01:27 -0400
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-09 23:13 -0700
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-10 14:20 +0000
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-10 10:09 -0700
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-11 15:18 +1200
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-11 05:00 +0000
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-10 22:34 -0700
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2020-07-12 12:54 +1200
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-12 04:22 +0000
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-12 06:07 +0000
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-10 18:47 +1200
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-10 14:27 +0000
Re: Arlen is a liar. Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-10 14:13 +0000
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-09 23:36 -0400
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-05 10:09 +1200
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 15:10 -0700
Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 23:29 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-04 16:56 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 21:36 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-05 10:06 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 23:23 +0000
How is it that Arlen can be this thick? Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs He really has no clue <none@all.com> - 2020-07-04 16:52 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Kees Nuyt <k.nuyt@nospam.demon.nl> - 2020-07-05 03:25 +0200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-05 03:08 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 20:27 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 17:21 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-04 16:59 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-04 17:12 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 23:57 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2020-07-05 21:15 +0100
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-05 00:14 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-04 16:40 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-04 17:12 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-05 03:22 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-12 10:51 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-12 14:47 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-12 12:21 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-12 15:32 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-12 12:53 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-12 17:20 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-12 15:14 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-12 18:26 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-12 14:12 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-12 17:20 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2020-07-19 11:11 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-21 12:48 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 16:12 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-13 09:11 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-12 19:56 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-12 20:08 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-13 01:26 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-13 07:20 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-13 08:06 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-13 11:30 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-13 17:07 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2020-07-13 23:22 +0200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-13 21:45 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-13 17:55 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-13 18:36 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-13 18:58 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Stephen Hoffman <seaohveh@hoffmanlabs.invalid> - 2020-07-14 15:30 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-14 21:52 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Stephen Hoffman <seaohveh@hoffmanlabs.invalid> - 2020-07-15 15:26 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-15 15:49 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Stephen Hoffman <seaohveh@hoffmanlabs.invalid> - 2020-07-20 12:20 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-20 20:09 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-20 16:53 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-21 10:39 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 14:45 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-21 16:24 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 16:44 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-21 15:13 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 18:38 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-21 22:53 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-22 08:28 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-22 08:42 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-21 15:20 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 18:38 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-22 11:17 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-21 19:14 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 19:18 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-21 17:02 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-21 20:09 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-22 23:59 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-23 00:10 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-23 04:59 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-23 13:56 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-23 19:29 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-24 04:47 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-24 11:40 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-24 11:55 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-24 16:21 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-24 19:11 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-24 17:09 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-24 11:50 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2020-07-24 20:27 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-24 18:13 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-24 16:37 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-24 20:05 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-25 01:40 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-24 21:55 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-25 03:43 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-25 00:06 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2020-07-25 14:47 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2020-07-25 14:32 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-25 10:51 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-25 14:16 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-25 17:53 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-25 18:36 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-25 18:00 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 02:51 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-25 23:01 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-25 23:08 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-25 23:16 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 11:07 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-26 14:11 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-26 14:59 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-26 17:00 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 23:39 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-26 23:34 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-26 19:48 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-26 19:19 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 23:32 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-26 19:48 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-26 04:09 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-26 09:51 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-26 14:30 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 23:53 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-24 19:11 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-23 10:27 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-23 16:29 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-23 19:36 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-23 20:09 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-24 04:56 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-24 12:04 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-24 12:35 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-24 16:31 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-24 19:11 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-24 17:26 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-24 16:58 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-24 19:11 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-24 16:26 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs joe <none@domain.invalid> - 2020-07-24 20:34 -0500
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-25 10:34 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs joe <none@domain.invalid> - 2020-07-25 13:08 -0500
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2020-07-25 20:20 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-25 17:51 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-25 18:36 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs joe <none@domain.invalid> - 2020-07-25 18:51 -0500
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-25 17:59 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-25 21:24 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-25 21:08 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-25 21:24 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-25 21:39 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-25 21:50 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 02:49 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 02:42 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 02:38 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 02:35 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-25 20:04 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-25 01:35 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-25 17:44 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 00:07 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-25 21:26 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-25 21:41 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 02:32 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-25 23:04 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-25 23:16 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-26 13:43 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-26 14:59 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-26 16:54 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-26 19:49 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-26 23:49 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-27 00:09 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-27 18:49 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-27 19:16 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-28 19:11 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-28 17:47 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-29 01:43 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-28 21:54 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-29 00:20 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-29 01:35 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-29 12:03 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-29 15:13 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-29 18:48 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-29 17:11 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-29 01:25 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-28 21:54 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-29 00:17 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-29 01:35 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-29 09:44 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-28 00:31 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-27 23:32 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-28 05:33 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-27 13:33 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-27 18:51 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-27 19:16 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-27 07:40 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-27 00:07 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-25 20:57 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 11:20 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-26 14:21 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-26 14:59 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 23:49 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-25 18:02 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-26 02:34 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-23 11:25 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-23 14:33 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-23 20:06 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-23 16:52 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2020-07-23 20:12 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-22 00:22 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-22 21:47 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2020-07-26 11:50 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-26 12:34 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-26 14:47 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-27 10:28 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-26 19:01 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-26 22:19 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2020-07-27 06:39 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-27 13:30 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-13 23:08 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-13 20:26 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-13 16:41 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-13 20:26 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-14 02:17 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2020-07-19 11:34 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-19 12:41 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-20 03:17 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-13 19:29 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-14 09:27 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2020-07-13 23:42 +0200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-13 21:47 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-14 11:56 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-14 10:50 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-14 14:23 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-15 08:39 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-14 21:48 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-14 21:54 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-14 21:18 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-14 21:25 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-14 22:06 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-14 22:21 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-15 02:30 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-15 07:56 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-15 09:02 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-15 09:50 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-15 13:13 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-15 15:42 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-15 15:44 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-16 08:43 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-14 11:45 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-14 10:35 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-14 14:23 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-15 08:38 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-14 21:10 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-15 08:59 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-14 11:47 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2020-07-14 17:42 +0200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-15 08:33 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-14 16:37 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-15 08:55 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2020-07-15 22:19 +0200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-16 08:47 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2020-07-15 23:10 +0200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-16 14:41 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2020-07-16 18:44 +0200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-16 10:16 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-16 14:29 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-07-17 08:34 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-13 17:55 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-13 23:19 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-13 20:26 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-14 21:30 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-15 10:05 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-15 13:13 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-23 00:06 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-23 00:10 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-23 15:34 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-23 19:06 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-23 19:42 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2020-07-26 11:56 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-12 16:58 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-12 20:08 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-27 22:30 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-06-27 19:08 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-06-27 19:11 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-28 02:19 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-06-28 00:37 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-28 16:20 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-06-28 12:52 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-28 21:30 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-06-29 16:45 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-30 04:21 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-01 02:56 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-27 22:41 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-06-27 19:16 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-28 00:26 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-28 00:30 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-28 02:25 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-28 03:05 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-06-28 12:44 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2020-06-29 11:51 +1200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-06-29 08:29 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-29 13:00 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-06-29 11:10 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-06-29 10:00 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-06-29 17:30 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2020-06-29 19:14 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-29 21:16 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-29 19:41 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-06-29 15:55 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-06-29 13:53 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-29 21:16 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-06-29 14:32 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-30 04:19 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 04:31 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-07-01 10:06 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-01 16:21 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-01 16:56 +0000
Why does Arlen always lose? Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Not Arlen <whodat@ness.biz> - 2020-07-01 10:40 -0700
Re: Why does Arlen always lose? Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs John Doe <always.look@message.header> - 2020-07-02 03:46 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-07-01 13:09 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-01 10:37 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-01 19:13 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-07-01 15:40 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-01 12:45 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-01 21:27 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-03 11:47 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-03 09:11 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-03 17:21 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-03 10:29 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-07-03 15:49 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-03 13:56 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-03 20:59 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-07-04 10:32 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-04 23:43 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Andreas Rutishauser <andreas@macandreas.ch> - 2020-07-05 08:59 +0200
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-05 15:52 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-04 15:43 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-04 14:18 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-05 17:14 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-03 16:26 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-03 16:50 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-03 21:17 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-03 13:55 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-07-01 15:46 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-01 12:51 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-03 02:25 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-03 01:11 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-03 15:51 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-03 21:12 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-04 00:31 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-03 20:54 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-04 03:18 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-03 23:50 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-04 12:40 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-07-04 10:34 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-04 11:03 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-05 16:00 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-04 16:19 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-04 20:27 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-07-05 16:46 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-05 17:49 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-06 02:09 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-03 14:41 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-01 10:33 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-01 19:15 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-29 21:16 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-06-29 14:27 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-06-29 09:15 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-06-29 16:59 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-06-29 16:53 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 04:53 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs joe <none@domain.invalid> - 2020-06-30 08:14 -0500
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Wolffan <akwolffan@zoho.com> - 2020-06-30 10:51 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 19:37 +0000
OT: Why must Arlen constantly lie? (was Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Just for Arlen <justforarlen@no.no.no.no> - 2020-06-30 13:57 -0700
Re: OT: Why must Arlen constantly lie? (was Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Wolffan <akwolffan@zoho.com> - 2020-07-01 16:55 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 17:48 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs joe <none@domain.invalid> - 2020-06-30 13:09 -0500
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-06-30 11:25 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 19:07 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Especially for Arlen <especiallyforarlen@no.no.no.no> - 2020-06-30 13:59 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlen_holder@newmachines.com> - 2020-12-02 04:59 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Leonardo Pacheco <lpacheco72@gmail.com> - 2020-07-28 23:58 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-29 09:47 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-07-29 08:38 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 04:44 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 04:49 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 05:02 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2020-07-01 12:27 -0700
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-01 15:41 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-03 02:18 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-01 21:32 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-03 02:01 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-03 14:43 +0000
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2020-07-04 15:36 -0400
Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-07-04 20:31 +0000
Page 4 of 26 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 26 Next page →
| From | Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-11 04:24 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <rebetb$5lt$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #133395 |
On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 23:35:31 -0400, nospam wrote: >> What would Apple's income be without Qualcomm? > > we'll soon find out. FACTS: Every item below has entire threads filled with facts, devoted to it... o Facts which the Type III apologists are utterly immune to in all cases. 1. Apple is great MARKETING with the absolute lowest R&D in all high tech. (these are facts which Type III apologists can't possibly understand) 2. Apple tried to do modems without Qualcomm which was an abject failure. (many people do not blame Apple, per se, though, as they blame Intel) 3. This was brought up when we proved Apple failed miserably at GPUs. (we discussed Apple GPU failures which only Type III apologists deny) 4. And, that Apple CPUs are so badly designed the holes are utterly huge! (only Type III apologists are unaware of these *unpatchable* flaws!) 5. Worse, almost all need to be throttled with more throttled every year. (your choice is unacceptable speed or unacceptable performance) (you have no other choice - and - you MUST pick one of those two) (or feed Apple by prematurely replacing your battery about every year) These are all well known examples of horrible designs coming out of Apple. With that as the background, what makes apologists think Apple can, for the first time in its history, make any best-in-class SOC with upcoming ARM technology fabricated at TSMC foundries. HINT: Nothing but pure MARKETING bullshit (e.g., "Apple Silicon"). -- Apple MARKETING is so good and yet, Apple R&D is the lowest in high tech.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-11 04:36 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <rebfl7$7ft$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #133396 |
Apple apologists _hate_ what Apple is, which facts always show. o That's why they hate facts about Apple products. They only want to believe in what Apple MARKETING told them it would be. o Like a child told by his mommy the monster can't get out of the closet. They _hate_ that they fell for the imaginary functionality that Apple MARKETING so cleverly sold them, and, as such, they even hate themselves. I may understand these strange apologists better than they know themselves. o So I know, before they do, they'll _deny_ outright all facts about Apple. Just as with all cultists, and much like flat earthers react to facts... Any fact about Apple they don't like, they claim is a "lie by liars". o And yet, they're _still_ facts whether or not Apologists like them. What's interesting is that Type III apologists like Alan Baker hate those facts about Apple products that show what Apple products truly are. Type III apologists like Alan Baker deny those facts even exist! o These Type III apologists call all facts they don't like, "lies". What's _really_ going on is VERY INTERESTING indeed. o Do these Apologists realize why they _hate_ facts about Apple? I (think I) do. HINT: They despise Apple products aren't what they were told by MARKETING. o *They _hate_ that MARKETING bamboozled them about these Apple products* They're desperate to believe in an imaginary world where Apple isn't what it really is. They _hate_ what Apple is, so much, that they literally deny it. o Also they _blame_ Google or Microsoft, for flaws in Apple products. They react to facts with childish responses - just look at _anything_ Alan Baker writes, all of which is trying to defend the _imaginary_ Apple that he believes exists. And yet, facts prove that it is all an illusion. o Crafted by Apple MARKETING (cleverly so). In summary, I believe the reason these apologists hate facts, and worse, they childishly hate anyone who brings facts to the table, is that they literally _hate_ what Apple is. -- They only want to believe in what Apple MARKETING told them it would be.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-11 10:40 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <recti5$a9h$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #133396 |
On 2020-07-10 9:24 p.m., Arlen Holder wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 23:35:31 -0400, nospam wrote: > >>> What would Apple's income be without Qualcomm? >> >> we'll soon find out. > > FACTS: > > Every item below has entire threads filled with facts, devoted to it... > o Facts which the Type III apologists are utterly immune to in all cases. > > 1. Apple is great MARKETING with the absolute lowest R&D in all high tech. > (these are facts which Type III apologists can't possibly understand) Nope. That's a lie. > > 2. Apple tried to do modems without Qualcomm which was an abject failure. > (many people do not blame Apple, per se, though, as they blame Intel) > > 3. This was brought up when we proved Apple failed miserably at GPUs. > (we discussed Apple GPU failures which only Type III apologists deny) That's certainly not been proven to be a fact. > > 4. And, that Apple CPUs are so badly designed the holes are utterly huge! > (only Type III apologists are unaware of these *unpatchable* flaws!) That's a flat out lie. > > 5. Worse, almost all need to be throttled with more throttled every year. > (your choice is unacceptable speed or unacceptable performance) > (you have no other choice - and - you MUST pick one of those two) > (or feed Apple by prematurely replacing your battery about every year) More bullshit. > > These are all well known examples of horrible designs coming out of Apple. > > With that as the background, what makes apologists think Apple can, for the > first time in its history, make any best-in-class SOC with upcoming ARM > technology fabricated at TSMC foundries. > > HINT: Nothing but pure MARKETING bullshit (e.g., "Apple Silicon"). So you're simultaneously claiming that Apple doesn't design its own chips... ...and that they're to blame for the design "flaws" you claim exist?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-12 12:55 +1200 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <uqnkgftfmhrlj10nsp4knacgd856r7iftm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #133395 |
On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 23:35:31 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >In article <56cigfpvm5rfl8go4bgo78ol7gm5g6llmc@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens ><eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote: > >> >> What would Apple's income be without Qualcomm? > >we'll soon find out. I know they are trying. -- Regards, Eric Stevens
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-12 01:10 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <redntu$euv$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #133424 |
On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 12:55:19 +1200, Eric Stevens wrote: >>> What would Apple's income be without Qualcomm? >> >>we'll soon find out. > > I know they are trying. What's interesting is the apologists, Alan Baker, can't stand that Apple surrendered to Qualcomm... so he simply denies all facts he can't handle. Like flat earthers do... o *Alan Baker _hates_ what Apple did so much he denies it even happened.* -- It wasn't what Apple led him to believe Apple "should" do (in Alan's mind).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-11 22:36 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <110720202236226351%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #133424 |
In article <uqnkgftfmhrlj10nsp4knacgd856r7iftm@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote: > >> > >> What would Apple's income be without Qualcomm? > > > >we'll soon find out. > > I know they are trying. and succeeding.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-12 04:17 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <ree2s7$95a$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #133428 |
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 22:36:22 -0400, nospam wrote: >>>> What would Apple's income be without Qualcomm? >>> >>>we'll soon find out. >> >> I know they are trying. > > and succeeding. Hi nospam, I realize you're a Type I apologist... o Which means you don't even believe half of what you claim. All you do is promote Apple, as if you're paid by them to do so. o That's the easiest way to predict _everything_ you'll ever say. Nonetheless, Apple MARKETING isn't gonna ever tell you the facts. a. They failed miserably in GPUs, which only an apologist would deny. b. They (along with Intel) failed miserably in modems, clearly. c. Hence, they surrendered to Qualcomm in desperation for 5G technology. Those are facts. o You don't like those facts, and MARKETING won't advertise those facts. But they're still facts. Given Apple is spending billions of dollars for modem technology, you'd "think" Apple could/would/should someday maybe kind of sort of catch up to Qualcomm. And maybe they will - as you're so very confident of. o But I think you're not anywhere near as confident as what you say. Because Type I apologists _know_ the facts. o You're not a moron of a 40 or 50 IQ like Alan Baker is, for example. Your IQ is probably just about or below normal, nospam. o So you _know_ the facts. Apple has _never_ in its entire history ever made even close to a best-in-class chip design (and don't claim that a CPU that requires throttling or it become unstable is a good design for Christ sake). And don't claim a CPU with unpatchable holes so big you can drive a Mack truck through as a 'best in class' design - because it's just not. Only MARKETING would ignore those flaws that are tremendously huge, nospam. o Yes, I know, you parrot MARKETING. But the good news is your IQ is normal or slightly below normal. o So you know the facts - and you can comprehend them. In summary, Apple is spending billions on it's map and modem technology. o And yet, they're likely doomed to failure Apple has never made a best-in-class app or a best in class CPU. o What Apple is best in class in is.... MARKETING. -- Apple doesn't need R&D since all they have to do is claim they did it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-13 16:16 +1200 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <6jnngf9oqdge47aj6ei6oofchg71tgkc5b@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #133430 |
On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 04:17:12 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> wrote: >On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 22:36:22 -0400, nospam wrote: > >>>>> What would Apple's income be without Qualcomm? >>>> >>>>we'll soon find out. >>> >>> I know they are trying. >> >> and succeeding. > >Hi nospam, > >I realize you're a Type I apologist... >o Which means you don't even believe half of what you claim. > >All you do is promote Apple, as if you're paid by them to do so. >o That's the easiest way to predict _everything_ you'll ever say. > >Nonetheless, Apple MARKETING isn't gonna ever tell you the facts. >a. They failed miserably in GPUs, which only an apologist would deny. >b. They (along with Intel) failed miserably in modems, clearly. >c. Hence, they surrendered to Qualcomm in desperation for 5G technology. > >Those are facts. >o You don't like those facts, and MARKETING won't advertise those facts. > >But they're still facts. > >Given Apple is spending billions of dollars for modem technology, you'd >"think" Apple could/would/should someday maybe kind of sort of catch up to >Qualcomm. The billions of dollars is partly for past sins. Apple got to the end of their license period and demanded that Qualcomm accept a much lower license fee. In the meantime Apple kept using Qualcomm technology. Then they started litigating Qualcomm in front of the Federal Trade Commission for overcharging and at the same time announced they hated Qualcomm so much that they were not going to use Qualcomm technology under any circumstances. But then, Intel gave up on their current modems and Apple was left with nowhere to go. :-( > >And maybe they will - as you're so very confident of. >o But I think you're not anywhere near as confident as what you say. > >Because Type I apologists _know_ the facts. >o You're not a moron of a 40 or 50 IQ like Alan Baker is, for example. > >Your IQ is probably just about or below normal, nospam. >o So you _know_ the facts. > >Apple has _never_ in its entire history ever made even close to a >best-in-class chip design (and don't claim that a CPU that requires >throttling or it become unstable is a good design for Christ sake). > >And don't claim a CPU with unpatchable holes so big you can drive a Mack >truck through as a 'best in class' design - because it's just not. > >Only MARKETING would ignore those flaws that are tremendously huge, nospam. >o Yes, I know, you parrot MARKETING. > >But the good news is your IQ is normal or slightly below normal. >o So you know the facts - and you can comprehend them. > >In summary, Apple is spending billions on it's map and modem technology. >o And yet, they're likely doomed to failure > >Apple has never made a best-in-class app or a best in class CPU. >o What Apple is best in class in is.... MARKETING. -- Regards, Eric Stevens
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-13 05:43 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <regs9d$r68$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #133469 |
On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 16:16:30 +1200, Eric Stevens wrote: > The billions of dollars is partly for past sins. Hi Eric Stevens, You have a grasp of detail that most people on this ng lack! It's a pleasure to find at least one other adult on this newsgroup. o Where, IMHO, adults can comprehend basic technical facts, like you did. Yes. I know what the billions and billions and billions were for, where, at the time of this thread, we didn't know even _half_ of the penalty! o *Apple may have paid something like two and a half to three and a half billion USD to Qualcomm (which is going to be paid by the poor Apple consumer)* <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/wuNSobnMdCU> Not all the billions though, since they bought out Intel, and they reputedly were working on a design center right in Qualcomm's back yard, and, of course, their royalties went _up_ appreciably, per iPhone, etc. So only _some_ of it was the three-way rebate system between Apple, it's suppliers, and Qualcomm that you seem to be aware of. Kudos to you though, as the apologists are always clueless that these details even exist (to them, everything is as simple as whatever MARKETING feeds them). Rest assured, MARKETING doesn't talk about the fact that Apple was so desperate for 5G technology, that they not only gave up EVERYTHING they were asking for, but they paid vastly more for it. Apple knew what most people don't realize, which is that you can't sell a phone highly MARKETED as a high-end phone, when it's dog slow compared to the Android phones. In short, Apple would have died, as a smartphone supplier, in just two years, just like Blockbuster died and a host of others. o *Apple would have died as a copmany if it didn't surrender to Qualcomm - now Apple is in advanced talks to purchase Intel's 5G unit for over a billion dollars more* <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/jUEvxhLv2Gk> The situation was that dire, which is why Qualcomm paid so much for it, where, the customer is now paying that price as Kuo tells us that Apple is removing the charger (yes, I know, the Android folks will follow suit as they love to follow Apple's lead on MARKETING shenanigans) simply to recoup some of those huge losses. > Apple got to the end > of their license period and demanded that Qualcomm accept a much lower > license fee. Yes. They pay, on average, 113% more now, in royalties per phone, as we wrote up in detailed threads long ago (which the moron apologists couldn't comprehend, particularly even the non-malicious Type II apologists like Steve Scharf, who _still_ thinks the royalties went down, sans a shred of fact backing up his imaginary belief system). o *Qualcomm seeks $31 million from Apple ($1.41 per iPhone with Intel radio chips) for 3 patent infringements in half the iPhones sold* <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ misc.phone.mobile.iphone/royalties$20qualcomm$20113$25|sort:date/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/-u600QXp0Js/3rqkqxilBwAJ> > In the meantime Apple kept using Qualcomm technology. Yes. I know. We all know, well, all the adults know what happened. o *Apple (Who really never invented anything they could steal) is Guilty of Infringing on Three Qualcomm Patents* <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/royalties$20qualcomm$20113$25|sort:date/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/6yjbZWpBad4/AqyEkxqlBwAJ> Apple put the rebate triad on hold, telling it's manufacturers not to pay it (it's a complex thing which we described in detail when the news first came out) - and it all caught up to them when Apple surrendered to Qualcomm. With interest, they had to pay about 4 billion, as I recall, just to catch up on the royalty rebates, but that's not what I'm talking about for the abject surrender, as that's only a small part of Apple's cost to obtain 5G technology. Remember, Apple would have died as a smartphone supplier, without 5G. o You can't charge horrendous prices for something that's dog-ass slow. > Then they started litigating Qualcomm in front of the Federal Trade > Commission for overcharging and at the same time announced they hated > Qualcomm so much that they were not going to use Qualcomm technology > under any circumstances. But then, Intel gave up on their current > modems and Apple was left with nowhere to go. :-( Yes. Yes. Yes. We know. It's good you know this, as you seem to be an intelligent guy. It's refreshsing to converse with someone, on these newsgroups, who isn't an utter moron by the way (which all the Appleseeds are, except for nospam, who isn't a moron - he's just always playing games. For nospam, he knows this stuff, but he plays the MARKETING game. For example, he knows Apple lost their shirt on Qualcomm, but he will either stay out of the factual discussion (he loses big time whenever he comes across me since I only speak facts), or, he simply plays stupid and denies all facts exist that MARKETING doesn't want you to know. Of course, the Type II apologists are different (e.g., Steve Scharf _still_ thinks royalties went down, because he simply filters out the facts). But the Type III are the worst to deal with, since they're like fifth grade bullies, who literally _hate_ what Apple is. Apologists are like kids whose mom is a high-priced prostitute where whenever someone points out that fact, they go into instant hateful vitriol denying all facts as "lies by liars" (and worse, if you've ever seen the hateful vitriol from Lewis, Joerg Lorenz, BK at onramp, and, of course, the moronic twins, Jolly Roger & Alan Baker) - you'll see the analogy to them defending their mom as a high-priced prostitute fits what they always do. Hell, I once easily proved Snit was a moron (along with nospam, and almost all the aforementioned apologists, and even Frank Slootweg), where, in response, Snit made an entire video against me, which, hilariously, was dead wrong on all counts (these morons didn't even LOOK at the Y axis for Christs' sake!). <https://youtu.be/7QaABa6DFIo> Notice _none_ of the apologists know a decibel from a megabit per second! <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/PZuec56EWB0/qSXecrnZAQAJ> Apologists are all literally _that_ incredibly stupid! o *It's a fact iOS devices can't even graph Wi-Fi signal strength over time* <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/PZuec56EWB0> Notice the apologists _hate_ that iOS lacks even the most basic functionality such that they brazenly _fabricate_ imaginary functionality, that simply doesn't exist. They _all_ do this - it's what makes them what they are. o *What freeware graphical Wi-Fi debugging tools do you use on Android & iOS to graph signal strength for available APs over time?* <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topicn/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/QlDr3oeZExA> Notice this lack of grasp of basic facts in _everything_ Alan Baker posts! o He doesn't get it that this entire thread proves he's an utter moron. Luckily, there are a handful of actual adults on the Apple newsgroups... o David Empson is one, you're another, as am I. But, sadly, there are likely fewer than 10 actual adults who commonly post. o The rest are these apologists who are basically flat earth cultist types. There is no chance of an adult conversation with the child-like apologists. Unlike the Apple apologists, you seem to have a grasp of the basic facts. o So it's a pleasure to find at least one other adult on this newsgroup. -- The apologists _hate_ anyone who is armed with facts; they don't know how to deal with actual facts - which the Apple newsgroups sorely lack and which is why Alan Baker posts everything he posts (none of the Apple apologists are used to dealing with intelligent people armed with facts). o Why are apologists like Alan Baker so fantastically immune to basics skills an adult should have on the Internet? <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/EiNl6hyMBDo>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-13 21:55 +1200 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <tkbogfte0sdbgdtncpqidgs0v5s8tb2rjj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #133471 |
On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 05:43:09 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> wrote: >On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 16:16:30 +1200, Eric Stevens wrote: > >> The billions of dollars is partly for past sins. > >Hi Eric Stevens, > >You have a grasp of detail that most people on this ng lack! Qualcomm uses Rambus technology. I have shares in Rambus.n > >It's a pleasure to find at least one other adult on this newsgroup. >o Where, IMHO, adults can comprehend basic technical facts, like you did. > >Yes. I know what the billions and billions and billions were for, where, at >the time of this thread, we didn't know even _half_ of the penalty! >o *Apple may have paid something like two and a half to three and a half billion USD to Qualcomm (which is going to be paid by the poor Apple consumer)* ><https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/wuNSobnMdCU> > >Not all the billions though, since they bought out Intel, and they >reputedly were working on a design center right in Qualcomm's back yard, >and, of course, their royalties went _up_ appreciably, per iPhone, etc. > >So only _some_ of it was the three-way rebate system between Apple, it's >suppliers, and Qualcomm that you seem to be aware of. > >Kudos to you though, as the apologists are always clueless that these >details even exist (to them, everything is as simple as whatever MARKETING >feeds them). > >Rest assured, MARKETING doesn't talk about the fact that Apple was so >desperate for 5G technology, that they not only gave up EVERYTHING they >were asking for, but they paid vastly more for it. > >Apple knew what most people don't realize, which is that you can't sell a >phone highly MARKETED as a high-end phone, when it's dog slow compared to >the Android phones. > >In short, Apple would have died, as a smartphone supplier, in just two >years, just like Blockbuster died and a host of others. >o *Apple would have died as a copmany if it didn't surrender to Qualcomm - now Apple is in advanced talks to purchase Intel's 5G unit for over a billion dollars more* ><https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/jUEvxhLv2Gk> > >The situation was that dire, which is why Qualcomm paid so much for it, >where, the customer is now paying that price as Kuo tells us that Apple is >removing the charger (yes, I know, the Android folks will follow suit as >they love to follow Apple's lead on MARKETING shenanigans) simply to recoup >some of those huge losses. > >> Apple got to the end >> of their license period and demanded that Qualcomm accept a much lower >> license fee. > >Yes. They pay, on average, 113% more now, in royalties per phone, as we >wrote up in detailed threads long ago (which the moron apologists couldn't >comprehend, particularly even the non-malicious Type II apologists like >Steve Scharf, who _still_ thinks the royalties went down, sans a shred of >fact backing up his imaginary belief system). >o *Qualcomm seeks $31 million from Apple ($1.41 per iPhone with Intel radio chips) for 3 patent infringements in half the iPhones sold* ><https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ >misc.phone.mobile.iphone/royalties$20qualcomm$20113$25|sort:date/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/-u600QXp0Js/3rqkqxilBwAJ> > >> In the meantime Apple kept using Qualcomm technology. > >Yes. I know. We all know, well, all the adults know what happened. >o *Apple (Who really never invented anything they could steal) is Guilty of Infringing on Three Qualcomm Patents* ><https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/royalties$20qualcomm$20113$25|sort:date/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/6yjbZWpBad4/AqyEkxqlBwAJ> > >Apple put the rebate triad on hold, telling it's manufacturers not to pay >it (it's a complex thing which we described in detail when the news first >came out) - and it all caught up to them when Apple surrendered to >Qualcomm. > >With interest, they had to pay about 4 billion, as I recall, just to catch >up on the royalty rebates, but that's not what I'm talking about for the >abject surrender, as that's only a small part of Apple's cost to obtain 5G >technology. > >Remember, Apple would have died as a smartphone supplier, without 5G. >o You can't charge horrendous prices for something that's dog-ass slow. > >> Then they started litigating Qualcomm in front of the Federal Trade >> Commission for overcharging and at the same time announced they hated >> Qualcomm so much that they were not going to use Qualcomm technology >> under any circumstances. But then, Intel gave up on their current >> modems and Apple was left with nowhere to go. :-( > >Yes. Yes. Yes. We know. It's good you know this, as you seem to be an >intelligent guy. > >It's refreshsing to converse with someone, on these newsgroups, who isn't >an utter moron by the way (which all the Appleseeds are, except for nospam, >who isn't a moron - he's just always playing games. For nospam, he knows >this stuff, but he plays the MARKETING game. > >For example, he knows Apple lost their shirt on Qualcomm, but he will >either stay out of the factual discussion (he loses big time whenever he >comes across me since I only speak facts), or, he simply plays stupid and >denies all facts exist that MARKETING doesn't want you to know. > >Of course, the Type II apologists are different (e.g., Steve Scharf _still_ >thinks royalties went down, because he simply filters out the facts). > >But the Type III are the worst to deal with, since they're like fifth grade >bullies, who literally _hate_ what Apple is. > >Apologists are like kids whose mom is a high-priced prostitute where >whenever someone points out that fact, they go into instant hateful vitriol >denying all facts as "lies by liars" (and worse, if you've ever seen the >hateful vitriol from Lewis, Joerg Lorenz, BK at onramp, and, of course, the >moronic twins, Jolly Roger & Alan Baker) - you'll see the analogy to them >defending their mom as a high-priced prostitute fits what they always do. > >Hell, I once easily proved Snit was a moron (along with nospam, and almost >all the aforementioned apologists, and even Frank Slootweg), where, in >response, Snit made an entire video against me, which, hilariously, was >dead wrong on all counts (these morons didn't even LOOK at the Y axis for >Christs' sake!). ><https://youtu.be/7QaABa6DFIo> > >Notice _none_ of the apologists know a decibel from a megabit per second! ><https://groups.google.com/d/msg/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/PZuec56EWB0/qSXecrnZAQAJ> > >Apologists are all literally _that_ incredibly stupid! >o *It's a fact iOS devices can't even graph Wi-Fi signal strength over time* ><https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/PZuec56EWB0> > >Notice the apologists _hate_ that iOS lacks even the most basic >functionality such that they brazenly _fabricate_ imaginary functionality, >that simply doesn't exist. They _all_ do this - it's what makes them what >they are. >o *What freeware graphical Wi-Fi debugging tools do you use on Android & iOS to graph signal strength for available APs over time?* ><https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topicn/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/QlDr3oeZExA> > >Notice this lack of grasp of basic facts in _everything_ Alan Baker posts! >o He doesn't get it that this entire thread proves he's an utter moron. > >Luckily, there are a handful of actual adults on the Apple newsgroups... >o David Empson is one, you're another, as am I. > >But, sadly, there are likely fewer than 10 actual adults who commonly post. >o The rest are these apologists who are basically flat earth cultist types. > >There is no chance of an adult conversation with the child-like apologists. > >Unlike the Apple apologists, you seem to have a grasp of the basic facts. >o So it's a pleasure to find at least one other adult on this newsgroup. -- Regards, Eric Stevens
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | delvon daily <delvondaily@example.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-13 14:37 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <reik7e$lj4$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #133474 |
Eric Stevens wrote: > Qualcomm uses Rambus technology. I have shares in Rambus. Is the Rambus "security" technology what you are saying Qualcomm uses that Apple is apparently frantically desperate to obtain (via licensing terms)? "I continue to believe that Qualcomm's license with Rambus highly favors Qualcomm but given Qualcomm's current conflict with Apple, I can't help but wonder why Qualcomm would not want to block Apple (and maybe Intel) from gaining access (via licensing) to Rambus's security technology? And if I was Apple or Intel, why would I not want to acquire some intellectual property (i.e. CryptoManger) that has been embedded within the Snapdragon mobile platform?" <https://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=3666&mn=767157&pt=msg&mid=17179067> Given how poorly Apple security has been shown to be (where there are so many holes, hackers have, in some cases, stopped accepting iOS holes and yet, Apple paints entire walls of buildings with their MARKETING bullshit on touting their imaginary security that only fools believe), the Rambus technology seems useful. See also: o *Rambus to Demonstrate IoT Security Technology in Qualcomm Booth at CES* <https://www.rambus.com/rambus-to-demonstrate-iot-security-technology-in-qualcomm-booth-at-ces/> "This demonstration, highlighting a smart city application, features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 processor and QCA4010 Wi-Fi chip, that are connected to an IoT cloud service using a protected link. The Rambus technology enables seamless security-focused features which includes mutual authentication and encrypted communication. These unique security features protect IoT devices from being used by hackers in malicious botnets, and prevent the IoT cloud service from being attacked by cloned devices." -- Bringing needed truth & logic to Apple newsgroups, one fact at a time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-13 15:13 -0700 |
| Subject | OT: Why must Arlen nymshift? (was Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <reim9t$uj6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #133486 |
On 2020-07-13 2:37 p.m., delvon daily wrote: > Eric Stevens wrote: > >> Qualcomm uses Rambus technology. I have shares in Rambus. > > Is the Rambus "security" technology what you are saying Qualcomm uses that > Apple is apparently frantically desperate to obtain (via licensing terms)? > > "I continue to believe that Qualcomm's license with Rambus highly favors > Qualcomm but given Qualcomm's current conflict with Apple, I can't help > but wonder why Qualcomm would not want to block Apple (and maybe Intel) > from gaining access (via licensing) to Rambus's security technology? > > And if I was Apple or Intel, why would I not want to acquire some > intellectual property (i.e. CryptoManger) that has been embedded within > the Snapdragon mobile platform?" > <https://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=3666&mn=767157&pt=msg&mid=17179067> You have no clue what you're talking about, Arlen.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-14 16:07 +1200 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <ghbqgflg647alve6menu11m3ju5ijr0c63@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #133486 |
On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 14:37:50 -0700, delvon daily <delvondaily@example.com> wrote: >Eric Stevens wrote: > >> Qualcomm uses Rambus technology. I have shares in Rambus. > >Is the Rambus "security" technology what you are saying Qualcomm uses that >Apple is apparently frantically desperate to obtain (via licensing terms)? I'm not privy to (or even following) the Apple/Qualcomm negotiations so I have no real idea. But the Rambus CRyptoManager technology is a lot more than simple security. Wade through https://www.rambus.com/security/ if you want to know more. I can't think of any reason why Apple would not want it (if they could get it for free). > "I continue to believe that Qualcomm's license with Rambus highly favors > Qualcomm but given Qualcomm's current conflict with Apple, I can't help > but wonder why Qualcomm would not want to block Apple (and maybe Intel) > from gaining access (via licensing) to Rambus's security technology? > > And if I was Apple or Intel, why would I not want to acquire some > intellectual property (i.e. CryptoManger) that has been embedded within > the Snapdragon mobile platform?" > <https://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=3666&mn=767157&pt=msg&mid=17179067> > >Given how poorly Apple security has been shown to be (where there are so >many holes, hackers have, in some cases, stopped accepting iOS holes and >yet, Apple paints entire walls of buildings with their MARKETING bullshit >on touting their imaginary security that only fools believe), the Rambus >technology seems useful. > >See also: >o *Rambus to Demonstrate IoT Security Technology in Qualcomm Booth at CES* ><https://www.rambus.com/rambus-to-demonstrate-iot-security-technology-in-qualcomm-booth-at-ces/> > > "This demonstration, highlighting a smart city application, features > the Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 processor and QCA4010 Wi-Fi chip, > that are connected to an IoT cloud service using a protected link. > > The Rambus technology enables seamless security-focused features which > includes mutual authentication and encrypted communication. > > These unique security features protect IoT devices from being used by > hackers in malicious botnets, and prevent the IoT cloud service from > being attacked by cloned devices." -- Regards, Eric Stevens
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-14 01:22 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <140720200122410423%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #133516 |
In article <ghbqgflg647alve6menu11m3ju5ijr0c63@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote: > I'm not privy to (or even following) the Apple/Qualcomm negotiations > so I have no real idea. then stop commenting on it. > But the Rambus CRyptoManager technology is a > lot more than simple security. Wade through > https://www.rambus.com/security/ if you want to know more. I can't > think of any reason why Apple would not want it (if they could get it > for free). they have no need for it at all, free or not.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-14 21:12 +1200 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <5ktqgftfnoo8fr763ol0n0313a5797fjfs@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #133517 |
On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 01:22:41 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >In article <ghbqgflg647alve6menu11m3ju5ijr0c63@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens ><eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote: > >> I'm not privy to (or even following) the Apple/Qualcomm negotiations >> so I have no real idea. > >then stop commenting on it. Indeed, I am refusing to comment on the negotiations. Can't you read. > >> But the Rambus CRyptoManager technology is a >> lot more than simple security. Wade through >> https://www.rambus.com/security/ if you want to know more. I can't >> think of any reason why Apple would not want it (if they could get it >> for free). > >they have no need for it at all, free or not. That may be your opinion but even if nothing else, the commercial implications are considerable. -- Regards, Eric Stevens
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-14 19:27 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <140720201927440845%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #133520 |
In article <5ktqgftfnoo8fr763ol0n0313a5797fjfs@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote: > >> I'm not privy to (or even following) the Apple/Qualcomm negotiations > >> so I have no real idea. > > > >then stop commenting on it. > > Indeed, I am refusing to comment on the negotiations. Can't you read. you aren't refusing at all. you keep babbling about it. > >> But the Rambus CRyptoManager technology is a > >> lot more than simple security. Wade through > >> https://www.rambus.com/security/ if you want to know more. I can't > >> think of any reason why Apple would not want it (if they could get it > >> for free). > > > >they have no need for it at all, free or not. > > That may be your opinion but even if nothing else, the commercial > implications are considerable. not in the least. apple has zero need or desire for anything rambus has done.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-15 11:59 +1200 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <6nhsgfdmtcejsgtqr2uhrckmrr6trjfugk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #133544 |
On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 19:27:44 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >In article <5ktqgftfnoo8fr763ol0n0313a5797fjfs@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens ><eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote: > >> >> I'm not privy to (or even following) the Apple/Qualcomm negotiations >> >> so I have no real idea. >> > >> >then stop commenting on it. >> >> Indeed, I am refusing to comment on the negotiations. Can't you read. > >you aren't refusing at all. you keep babbling about it. > >> >> But the Rambus CRyptoManager technology is a >> >> lot more than simple security. Wade through >> >> https://www.rambus.com/security/ if you want to know more. I can't >> >> think of any reason why Apple would not want it (if they could get it >> >> for free). >> > >> >they have no need for it at all, free or not. >> >> That may be your opinion but even if nothing else, the commercial >> implications are considerable. > >not in the least. apple has zero need or desire for anything rambus has >done. Says he in a fit of pique. -- Regards, Eric Stevens
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-14 22:54 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <140720202254274925%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #133545 |
In article <6nhsgfdmtcejsgtqr2uhrckmrr6trjfugk@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote: > >> >> But the Rambus CRyptoManager technology is a > >> >> lot more than simple security. Wade through > >> >> https://www.rambus.com/security/ if you want to know more. I can't > >> >> think of any reason why Apple would not want it (if they could get it > >> >> for free). > >> > > >> >they have no need for it at all, free or not. > >> > >> That may be your opinion but even if nothing else, the commercial > >> implications are considerable. > > > >not in the least. apple has zero need or desire for anything rambus has > >done. > > Says he in a fit of pique. not at all. as usual, you have *nothing* to back up your claim. you have failed to articulate *any* reason why apple would be interested in rambus, because there is none.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-16 16:37 +1200 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <samvgfhn23v54g9d5seornursckf2klaia@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #133555 |
On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 22:54:27 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >In article <6nhsgfdmtcejsgtqr2uhrckmrr6trjfugk@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens ><eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote: > >> >> >> But the Rambus CRyptoManager technology is a >> >> >> lot more than simple security. Wade through >> >> >> https://www.rambus.com/security/ if you want to know more. I can't >> >> >> think of any reason why Apple would not want it (if they could get it >> >> >> for free). >> >> > >> >> >they have no need for it at all, free or not. >> >> >> >> That may be your opinion but even if nothing else, the commercial >> >> implications are considerable. >> > >> >not in the least. apple has zero need or desire for anything rambus has >> >done. >> >> Says he in a fit of pique. > >not at all. > >as usual, you have *nothing* to back up your claim. > >you have failed to articulate *any* reason why apple would be >interested in rambus, because there is none. Browse https://www.rambus.com/security/ -- Regards, Eric Stevens
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-16 18:10 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Apple profits vs Qualcomm profits (was Re: Arlen is an idiot Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs |
| Message-ID | <160720201810070223%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #133596 |
In article <samvgfhn23v54g9d5seornursckf2klaia@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote: > > > >you have failed to articulate *any* reason why apple would be > >interested in rambus, because there is none. > > Browse https://www.rambus.com/security/ you are deliberately not answering the question. no surprise there. you are also further demonstrating just how little you know about apple and their products.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 26 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 26 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web