Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #70641 > unrolled thread
| Started by | John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-03-07 18:34 -0800 |
| Last post | 2015-03-08 08:23 -0400 |
| Articles | 4 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
REstoring an MBPro John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2015-03-07 18:34 -0800
Re: REstoring an MBPro nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-07 21:38 -0500
Re: REstoring an MBPro Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-03-08 16:02 +1300
Re: REstoring an MBPro Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-03-08 08:23 -0400
| From | John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-07 18:34 -0800 |
| Subject | REstoring an MBPro |
| Message-ID | <mdgcdm$6d2$1@dont-email.me> |
I now have access to all 490 GB of a borked MBP, via booting off an external FW drive. I was thinking of copying- cloning is perhaps a better word, most of it to a 500 Gig HD, reformatting the broken computer, and then restoring it to the now hopefully nicely formatted and running MBP. But what to use? Time Machine? SuperDuper? Straight copy, then install Yosemite Fresh? TM and then fresh install then Restore via TM? In fact, does TM make a copy of all or most of the System files? In any event, I will be leaving out a hundred or more Gigs on the restore.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-07 21:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <070320152138348592%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #70641 |
In article <mdgcdm$6d2$1@dont-email.me>, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote: > I now have access to all 490 GB of a borked MBP, via booting off an > external FW drive. I was thinking of copying- cloning is perhaps a > better word, most of it to a 500 Gig HD, reformatting the broken > computer, and then restoring it to the now hopefully nicely formatted > and running MBP. > > But what to use? Time Machine? SuperDuper? Straight copy, then install > Yosemite Fresh? TM and then fresh install then Restore via TM? > > In fact, does TM make a copy of all or most of the System files? In any > event, I will be leaving out a hundred or more Gigs on the restore. cloning would be the easiest. carbon copy cloner lets you choose what gets copied while superduper clones everything (skipping stuff that doesn't need to be copied, like vm swap files, etc.). you can always delete stuff after it's done.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-08 16:02 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <080320151602428897%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #70641 |
In article <mdgcdm$6d2$1@dont-email.me>, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote: > > I now have access to all 490 GB of a borked MBP, via booting off an > external FW drive. I was thinking of copying- cloning is perhaps a > better word, most of it to a 500 Gig HD, reformatting the broken > computer, and then restoring it to the now hopefully nicely formatted > and running MBP. > > But what to use? Time Machine? SuperDuper? Straight copy, then install > Yosemite Fresh? TM and then fresh install then Restore via TM? That could depend on what's actually wrong with the original hard drive. If it has lots of corrupted files in the system, then it's pointless restoring those to the new drive. Personally, I always think it's best to start with a complete fresh reinstall of the OS and applications you need, as well as any necessary updaters, then restore your own documents from the backup as and when you actually need it. You'll usually find there's a huge pile of stuff you never use and never miss. > In fact, does TM make a copy of all or most of the System files? In any > event, I will be leaving out a hundred or more Gigs on the restore. It depends on what you set Time Machine up to backup. Most people only backup their own files - they can easily restore the OS (or could before Apple stupidly went to Internet installation) and Time Machine doesn't play nicely with some files (some web browser caches for example are stored in one huge file, that means the huge file is backed up every time it changes and therefore wastes a lot of backup drive space).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-08 08:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <54fc3f5d$0$14768$b1db1813$46decd27@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #70641 |
In article <mdgcdm$6d2$1@dont-email.me>, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote: > I now have access to all 490 GB of a borked MBP, via booting off an > external FW drive. I was thinking of copying- cloning is perhaps a > better word, most of it to a 500 Gig HD, reformatting the broken > computer, and then restoring it to the now hopefully nicely formatted > and running MBP. > > But what to use? Time Machine? SuperDuper? Straight copy, then install > Yosemite Fresh? TM and then fresh install then Restore via TM? > > In fact, does TM make a copy of all or most of the System files? In any > event, I will be leaving out a hundred or more Gigs on the restore. I did that very thing recently. To "clone" the drive, I just used the restore function in Disk Utility. I don't know how TM works. -- Where's the Vangelis music? Pris' tongue is sticking out in in the wide shot after Batty has kissed her. They have put back more tits into the Zhora dressing room scene. -- notes for Blade Runner
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web