Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #68829 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Madison James <madison@mailisnothere.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-01-24 00:49 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-01-26 01:29 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 201 — 34 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Madison James <madison@mailisnothere.org> - 2015-01-24 00:49 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Dave Doe <hard@work.ok> - 2015-01-24 14:00 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Paul <nospam@needed.com> - 2015-01-23 20:19 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-24 02:07 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2015-01-24 13:01 +0100
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) victor davis <vic@this.is.not.real.com> - 2015-01-24 15:41 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-24 10:47 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-24 20:23 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-24 16:34 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2015-01-24 10:29 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-24 10:41 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-24 20:25 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2015-01-24 15:49 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-01-24 15:14 -0600
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-24 21:51 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-24 21:56 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2015-01-24 17:41 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) victor davis <vic@this.is.not.real.com> - 2015-01-24 16:22 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Mike Barnes <mikebarnes333@gmail.com> - 2015-01-24 16:28 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2015-01-24 11:49 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-01-24 17:08 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> - 2015-01-24 14:34 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Ken Blake <kblake@kb.invalid> - 2015-01-24 16:56 -0700
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> - 2015-01-24 16:04 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 01:33 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> - 2015-01-26 11:47 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2015-01-25 04:44 +0700
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Don Phillipson" <e925@SPAMBLOCK.ncf.ca> - 2015-01-24 17:55 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2015-01-24 18:24 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-01-25 11:29 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Godzilla <godzilla@lizardboss.invalid> - 2015-01-25 12:37 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-25 09:31 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-01-24 17:22 -0600
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-25 00:39 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-25 09:17 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-25 16:10 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-25 11:25 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-25 16:46 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2015-01-25 13:24 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-25 13:35 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-25 23:46 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 01:37 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-26 11:30 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2015-01-26 13:21 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> - 2015-01-26 11:50 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 00:16 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-27 13:40 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 00:56 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-27 00:59 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 01:18 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 20:41 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 01:56 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-27 16:13 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-28 00:46 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-27 03:13 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-28 00:34 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 21:25 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-28 03:44 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-28 03:42 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-28 08:44 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-28 20:18 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-28 22:50 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-28 23:48 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-28 23:51 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-29 03:25 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-29 02:16 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-29 03:25 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-28 20:23 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-28 19:19 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 20:41 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-27 16:11 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 00:59 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-27 16:14 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 08:53 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-28 09:05 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2015-01-27 16:46 -0600
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 18:55 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2015-01-27 18:04 -0600
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-28 13:40 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2015-01-27 21:04 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-28 18:12 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-28 13:38 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 16:51 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2015-01-28 12:21 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-28 13:17 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-28 22:56 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> - 2015-01-28 15:41 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-28 19:21 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-29 02:18 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> - 2015-01-28 20:01 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-29 18:35 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2015-01-29 10:34 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-30 09:06 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> - 2015-01-29 11:26 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-28 19:20 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2015-01-28 16:54 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-28 20:13 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2015-01-28 17:15 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-28 23:59 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-28 22:58 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-29 00:01 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-29 02:19 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-29 03:31 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-28 19:14 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> - 2015-01-28 15:46 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2015-01-30 12:36 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> - 2015-01-26 17:46 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 00:14 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2015-01-27 01:50 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 22:38 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 11:24 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-26 11:31 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-01-26 07:47 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 15:23 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 22:37 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 20:41 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-01-26 07:46 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-25 16:48 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-01-25 16:54 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2015-01-25 18:02 +0100
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-25 13:35 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-25 23:54 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 01:41 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-25 22:23 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-26 11:33 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-01-26 07:48 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> - 2015-01-26 11:56 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-01-26 15:28 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 00:23 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2015-01-27 13:00 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 15:23 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> - 2015-01-26 13:13 -0800
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 00:19 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 20:41 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 01:52 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 22:17 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-28 00:43 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 22:40 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 00:22 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 20:41 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 01:53 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-27 03:15 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 08:48 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-27 14:10 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 22:17 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 08:43 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-28 09:00 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-25 21:28 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-26 11:34 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-25 21:54 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-26 11:35 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 15:23 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 22:47 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 20:41 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Ken Blake <kblake@kb.invalid> - 2015-01-27 08:12 -0700
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-27 10:27 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Ken Blake <kblake@kb.invalid> - 2015-01-27 10:19 -0700
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) ". . .winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 15:16 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Ken Blake <kblake@kb.invalid> - 2015-01-27 13:38 -0700
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-27 16:02 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-27 16:02 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Ken Blake <kblake@kb.invalid> - 2015-01-27 14:49 -0700
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-27 18:13 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-01-27 16:25 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Ken Blake <kblake@kb.invalid> - 2015-01-27 10:28 -0700
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 16:25 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2015-01-28 12:12 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-27 16:02 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-28 09:29 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-28 00:38 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2015-01-27 12:54 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-28 08:57 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-01-27 20:18 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Eef Hartman <E.J.M.Hartman@gmail.com> - 2015-01-25 20:34 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-25 23:49 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-01-25 18:27 -0600
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-25 21:54 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-01-25 22:52 -0700
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Stormin' Norman <norman@schwarzkopf.invalid> - 2015-01-26 13:19 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-01-26 07:36 -0600
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-01-26 07:27 -0600
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 01:42 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-25 16:49 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-25 13:35 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-25 16:11 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-25 23:48 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-25 21:27 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 01:35 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-25 21:54 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-26 11:38 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Eef Hartman <E.J.M.Hartman@gmail.com> - 2015-01-26 12:46 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 00:10 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Eef Hartman <E.J.M.Hartman@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 00:51 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 08:51 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-27 22:19 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 18:23 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-01-28 13:44 +1300
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-01-26 15:23 -0500
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2015-01-24 22:29 -0700
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Sage <sage@mail.invalid> - 2015-01-25 16:11 +0000
Re: What is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth (for panopticlick) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-01-26 01:29 +0000
Page 2 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 11 Next page →
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-24 17:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cii1rsFengaU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #68869 |
On 2015-01-24, Mayayana <mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote:
>
>| > What do you mean by posting to political forums?
>| > If you're posting comments then what does your
>| > screen size matter?
>|
>| Anonymity is enhanced by having a commonly-used profile, and your
>| profile includes screen size and colour depth as reported by the browser.
>|
Do you think you could include an attribution line, as is customary
on Usenet?
--
Today is Prickle-Prickle, the 24th day of Chaos in the YOLD 3181
I don't have an attitude problem. If you have a problem with my attitude,
that's your problem.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-24 14:34 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <1veprms1z01j5$.dlg@stumbler1907.invalid> |
| In reply to | #68871 |
On 24 Jan 2015 17:08:12 GMT, Huge wrote: > On 2015-01-24, Mayayana <mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote: >> >>| > What do you mean by posting to political forums? >>| > If you're posting comments then what does your >>| > screen size matter? >>| >>| Anonymity is enhanced by having a commonly-used profile, and your >>| profile includes screen size and colour depth as reported by the browser. >>| > > Do you think you could include an attribution line, as is customary > on Usenet? He's been asked to do so before... -- Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ken Blake <kblake@kb.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-24 16:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <h8c8cadqtoi3ard42cvgov03hehk4u81me@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #68895 |
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 14:34:38 -0800, "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> wrote: > On 24 Jan 2015 17:08:12 GMT, Huge wrote: > > > On 2015-01-24, Mayayana <mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote: > >> > >>| > What do you mean by posting to political forums? > >>| > If you're posting comments then what does your > >>| > screen size matter? > >>| > >>| Anonymity is enhanced by having a commonly-used profile, and your > >>| profile includes screen size and colour depth as reported by the browser. > >>| > > > > Do you think you could include an attribution line, as is customary > > on Usenet? > > He's been asked to do so before... ...but he prefers to get killfiled by more and more of us here.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-24 16:04 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <i7scyjblzfu8.dlg@stumbler1907.invalid> |
| In reply to | #68907 |
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 16:56:48 -0700, Ken Blake wrote: > On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 14:34:38 -0800, "Gene E. Bloch" > <not-me@other.invalid> wrote: > >> On 24 Jan 2015 17:08:12 GMT, Huge wrote: >> >>> On 2015-01-24, Mayayana <mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote: >>>> >>>>| > What do you mean by posting to political forums? >>>>| > If you're posting comments then what does your >>>>| > screen size matter? >>>>| >>>>| Anonymity is enhanced by having a commonly-used profile, and your >>>>| profile includes screen size and colour depth as reported by the browser. >>>>| >>> >>> Do you think you could include an attribution line, as is customary >>> on Usenet? >> >> He's been asked to do so before... > > ...but he prefers to get killfiled by more and more of us here. I find some of his posts interesting and of value... So my ellipsis wasn't meant to imply quite the same completion as yours :-) -- Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-26 01:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnmcb6d5.2fdl.g.kreme@kreme.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #68871 |
Okay, so one time? In band camp? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> was all, like: > On 2015-01-24, Mayayana <mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote: >> >>| > What do you mean by posting to political forums? >>| > If you're posting comments then what does your >>| > screen size matter? >>| >>| Anonymity is enhanced by having a commonly-used profile, and your >>| profile includes screen size and colour depth as reported by the browser. >>| > Do you think you could include an attribution line, as is customary > on Usenet? No chance he's going to start now. -- 'Never trust a ruler who puts his faith in tunnels and bunkers and escape routes. The chances are that his heart isn't in the job.'
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-26 11:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <er95qhic992n$.dlg@stumbler1907.invalid> |
| In reply to | #68973 |
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 01:33:57 +0000 (UTC), Lewis wrote: > Okay, so one time? In band camp? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> was all, like: >> On 2015-01-24, Mayayana <mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote: >>> >>>| > What do you mean by posting to political forums? >>>| > If you're posting comments then what does your >>>| > screen size matter? >>>| >>>| Anonymity is enhanced by having a commonly-used profile, and your >>>| profile includes screen size and colour depth as reported by the browser. >>>| > >> Do you think you could include an attribution line, as is customary >> on Usenet? > > No chance he's going to start now. Careful: did you see what my similar remark triggered from Mayayana? -- Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-25 04:44 +0700 |
| Message-ID | <11jpgb3nxlbbu$.1acxbxeu8oe1t$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #68829 |
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:49:06 +0000 (UTC), Madison James wrote: > I want to be as neutral as possible when posting to political forums. > I use Panopticlick as my test of my browser fingerprint. > > I am working on changing that fingerprint, and one change is my reported > "Screen Size and Color Depth" > > Here are all the viable screen sizes and color depths > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_display_standard > > Just before I log into the political forums, I want to temporarily > set mine to the most common there is out there today. > > But what is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth today? > > Is it "1024x768x24" or "1366x768" or "1280x1024" or ? Color depth would be 24/32-bit for most systems (16,777,216 colors). Screen size would be 1366x768 (widescreen format). Screen size stats: <http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=17> Screen size and color depth stats (old): <http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Don Phillipson" <e925@SPAMBLOCK.ncf.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-24 17:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ma1803$ahl$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #68829 |
"Madison James" <madison@mailisnothere.org> wrote in message news:m9uq61$hfs$1@news.mixmin.net... >I want to be as neutral as possible when posting to political forums. > I use Panopticlick as my test of my browser fingerprint. > . . . > Just before I log into the political forums, I want to temporarily > set mine to the most common there is out there today. > > But what is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth today? > > Is it "1024x768x24" or "1366x768" or "1280x1024" or ? 1. The Panopticlick web site claims to promote privacy through anonymity (suggesting browser configurations can be used to identify posters, and offering to measure the user's.) 2. Screen size and colour depth are configured for monitors (hardware): browsers are software. -- Don Phillipson Carlsbad Springs (Ottawa, Canada)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-24 18:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ma19dp$jgu$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #68898 |
| 1. The Panopticlick web site claims to promote privacy through
| anonymity (suggesting browser configurations can be used to
| identify posters, and offering to measure the user's.)
| 2. Screen size and colour depth are configured for monitors
| (hardware): browsers are software.
It's just one more set of identifying bits of data that
are possible to collect if script is enabled. Those
details have been available as part of the scripting
document object model since the early days. I don't
know exactly what's in the W3C standard, but here's
an example of what one can return for IE:
'-------- save the following in a file ending with .vbs
' ---- and then run that file to see a demo.
Set IE = CreateObject("InternetExplorer.Application")
ie.Navigate "about:blank"
Do Until ie.ReadyState = 4
Loop
With IE.document.parentwindow.screen
s = "Available height: " & .availHeight & vbCrLf
s = s & "Available width: " & .availWidth & vbCrLf
s = s & "Buffer depth: " & .bufferDepth & vbCrLf
s = s & "color depth: " & .colorDepth & vbCrLf
s = s & "Height: " & .height & vbCrLf
s = s & "Update interval: " & .updateInterval & vbCrLf
s = s & "Width: " & .width
End With
MsgBox s
ie.Quit
Set ie = Nothing
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-25 11:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cik2cfFu9bnU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #68900 |
On 2015-01-24, Mayayana <mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote:
>| 1. The Panopticlick web site claims to promote privacy through
>| anonymity (suggesting browser configurations can be used to
>| identify posters, and offering to measure the user's.)
>| 2. Screen size and colour depth are configured for monitors
>| (hardware): browsers are software.
No attribution. Wanker. Killfiled.
--
Today is Setting Orange, the 25th day of Chaos in the YOLD 3181
I don't have an attitude problem. If you have a problem with my attitude,
that's your problem.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Godzilla <godzilla@lizardboss.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-25 12:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ma2o2p$nnd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #68928 |
On 2015-01-25, Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: > On 2015-01-24, Mayayana <mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote: >>| 1. The Panopticlick web site claims to promote privacy through >>| anonymity (suggesting browser configurations can be used to >>| identify posters, and offering to measure the user's.) >>| 2. Screen size and colour depth are configured for monitors >>| (hardware): browsers are software. > > No attribution. Wanker. Killfiled. > Used the word wanker. Killfiled, Not really, I'm not 13. -- _____ _______ ____ __ __ _____ _ / ____|__ __/ __ \| \/ | __ \ | | | (___ | | | | | | \ / | |__) | | | \___ \ | | | | | | |\/| | ___/ | | ____) | | | | |__| | | | | | |_| |_____/ |_| \____/|_| |_|_| (_)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-25 09:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <54c4fe51$0$32451$c3e8da3$cc4fe22d@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #68928 |
In article <cik2cfFu9bnU2@mid.individual.net>, Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: > On 2015-01-24, Mayayana <mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote: > >| 1. The Panopticlick web site claims to promote privacy through > >| anonymity (suggesting browser configurations can be used to > >| identify posters, and offering to measure the user's.) > >| 2. Screen size and colour depth are configured for monitors > >| (hardware): browsers are software. > > No attribution. Wanker. Killfiled. Must be hurtful. -- Where's the Vangelis music? Pris' tongue is sticking out in in the wide shot after Batty has kissed her. They have put back more tits into the Zhora dressing room scene. -- notes for Blade Runner
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-24 17:22 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <87386z3gs7.fsf@thumper.dhh.gt.org> |
| In reply to | #68898 |
Don Phillipson writes: > Screen size and colour depth are configured for monitors (hardware): > browsers are software. What screen size and colour depth you use need not be the same as what your browser reports. If I wanted to post secretly to political sites I think that I might dedicate a machine to that purpose, booting it from a CD each time and using Tor. But then if I wanted to post anywhere secretly I would not discuss my intentions here (or anywhere else). -- John Hasler jhasler@newsguy.com Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sage <sage@mail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-25 00:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ma1dvb$a1c$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #68898 |
Don Phillipson wrote, on Sat, 24 Jan 2015 17:55:23 -0500: > 2. Screen size and colour depth are configured for monitors (hardware): > browsers are software. Realize that the Tor Browser Bundle Firefox reports different numbers (on purpose) than does the Mozilla Firefox browser, both of which are Firefox. So, it's all in the software WHAT it reports.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-25 09:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <54c4fb06$0$11284$b1db1813$e2fc9064@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #68898 |
In article <ma1803$ahl$1@news.albasani.net>, "Don Phillipson" <e925@SPAMBLOCK.ncf.ca> wrote: > "Madison James" <madison@mailisnothere.org> wrote in message > news:m9uq61$hfs$1@news.mixmin.net... > > >I want to be as neutral as possible when posting to political forums. > > I use Panopticlick as my test of my browser fingerprint. > > . . . > > Just before I log into the political forums, I want to temporarily > > set mine to the most common there is out there today. > > > > But what is the most common Screen Size and Color Depth today? > > > > Is it "1024x768x24" or "1366x768" or "1280x1024" or ? > > 1. The Panopticlick web site claims to promote privacy through > anonymity (suggesting browser configurations can be used to > identify posters, and offering to measure the user's.) > 2. Screen size and colour depth are configured for monitors > (hardware): browsers are software. What's more "identifying" is the list of fonts they can retrieve from your system. -- Where's the Vangelis music? Pris' tongue is sticking out in in the wide shot after Batty has kissed her. They have put back more tits into the Zhora dressing room scene. -- notes for Blade Runner
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sage <sage@mail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-25 16:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ma34hf$nt8$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #68930 |
Warren Oates wrote, on Sun, 25 Jan 2015 09:17:42 -0500: > What's more "identifying" is the list of fonts they can retrieve from > your system. What surprises me is that fonts aren't "more" standard than they are. For one, I could probably do with perhaps a dozen or so true-type fonts, for the most part (e.g., arial, symbol, helvetica, timesnewroman, couriernew, etc.). For another, why aren't the fonts more standardized across platforms (e.g., why would windows need different fonts than linux?). Is there a way to "reduce" the fonts to a standard package?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-25 11:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <250120151125543488%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #68937 |
In article <ma34hf$nt8$1@solani.org>, Sage <sage@mail.invalid> wrote: > > What's more "identifying" is the list of fonts they can retrieve from > > your system. > > What surprises me is that fonts aren't "more" standard than they are. they cant be. > For one, I could probably do with perhaps a dozen or so true-type fonts, > for the most part (e.g., arial, symbol, helvetica, timesnewroman, > couriernew, etc.). you might, but the rest of the world certainly would not be able to do that. what a boring world it would be if everyone used the same font. > For another, why aren't the fonts more standardized across platforms > (e.g., why would windows need different fonts than linux?). because linux users won't pay for the original fonts so they end up with knockoffs that are never exactly correct or as good. > Is there a way to "reduce" the fonts to a standard package? only if you want to have everything look wrong.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sage <sage@mail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-25 16:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ma36ka$nt8$3@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #68941 |
nospam wrote, on Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:25:54 -0500: > what a boring world it would be if everyone used the same font. I didn't say the "same font". I said the "same fonts". How many fonts does the average person need? We're not talking specialists. We're talking mom and pop, who basically surf the web and read their email? How many fonts does the average person (explicitly) use anyway? I use a monospaced font and a kerning font,and that's about it. So, two Truetype fonts would do me just fine. I guess my question would be how "I" could make "my" fonts more "standard" so that they don't give me away.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-25 13:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ma3c7h$j60$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #68943 |
| How many fonts does the average person need? | We're not talking specialists. | I use quite a few for graphics. Anything that looks good I'll install, in order to have options. Most people don't work with graphics, but they often get new fonts from software, scanners, printers, etc. I wouldn't be surprised if, for instance, an installed version of MS Office could be identified. I know that some of the Wingdings fonts only came with MS Office. OS version should also be identifiable. So if you were on Linux and wanted to hide that you might want to install the set of fonts that comes with Windows 7. | I guess my question would be how "I" could make "my" fonts more | "standard" so that they don't give me away. | This listing might give you some ideas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Microsoft_Windows_fonts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-25 13:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <250120151335360364%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #68943 |
In article <ma36ka$nt8$3@solani.org>, Sage <sage@mail.invalid> wrote: > > what a boring world it would be if everyone used the same font. > > I didn't say the "same font". I said the "same fonts". there are millions of fonts, so there cannot be a standard 'set'. > How many fonts does the average person need? that depends on the person and whether they want to settle for things looking ugly or not. > We're not talking specialists. nobody said anything about specialists. > We're talking mom and pop, who basically surf the web and read > their email? no we're not. > How many fonts does the average person (explicitly) use anyway? quite a few, and it need not be explicitly. > I use a monospaced font and a kerning font,and that's about it. > So, two Truetype fonts would do me just fine. maybe it would for you but what a boring world it would be if everyone used the same two fonts. > I guess my question would be how "I" could make "my" fonts more > "standard" so that they don't give me away. you can start by taking off the tinfoil hat, but the answer is, you can't have a standard set of fonts because there isn't a standard set of fonts. apps and web sites can install their own.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web