Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #55637 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-01-30 21:44 -0800 |
| Last post | 2014-02-01 10:30 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 269 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
Malware help and skepticism Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-01-30 21:44 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-01-31 19:35 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2014-01-30 22:46 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-01-31 02:11 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-01-31 09:34 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-01-31 13:22 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-01 09:57 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-01-31 12:48 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2014-01-31 22:23 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-01-31 20:39 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-01 15:07 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-01 17:06 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2014-02-02 01:44 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2014-02-02 01:36 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-02 15:04 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-01-31 21:50 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-01 15:08 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2014-02-01 15:27 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2014-02-02 01:45 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-07 09:33 +0100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-08 09:32 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism David Ritz <dritz@mindspring.com> - 2014-01-31 08:02 -0600
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-01-31 09:57 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism isw <isw@witzend.com> - 2014-01-31 10:37 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-01-31 12:57 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism John Albert <j.albert@snet.net> - 2014-01-31 16:59 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> - 2014-02-01 12:34 -0600
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-01 22:58 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-01 18:42 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-02 12:50 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-02 12:47 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2014-02-02 15:01 -0600
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 10:11 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-04 08:47 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-03 20:25 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2014-02-03 16:13 -0600
Re: Malware help and skepticism erilar <drache@chibardun.net.invalid> - 2014-02-03 17:11 -0600
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-03 23:35 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-04 11:19 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-04 08:51 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-04 08:06 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-04 17:12 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-04 17:23 +0000
P.S. Hoffman (was Re: Malware help and skepticism) Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-02-04 19:34 +0000
Re: P.S. Hoffman (was Re: Malware help and skepticism) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-04 21:28 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-04 10:30 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-04 17:51 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-04 11:34 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-04 21:20 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 09:36 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-06 12:12 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-04 18:10 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-04 18:20 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-04 17:29 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-04 18:28 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-04 14:03 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-04 19:22 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 09:24 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-05 08:56 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 09:28 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 01:11 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-02-05 07:25 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 13:27 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-05 14:20 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 06:42 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-05 15:02 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 10:18 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-05 16:44 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 12:48 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 22:58 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-07 19:13 +0100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 09:22 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 23:24 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 17:57 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-06 14:03 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-06 08:06 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 18:02 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-06 14:04 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-06 12:12 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-05 06:00 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-04 17:32 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 14:04 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-04 17:28 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-04 18:09 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-04 18:31 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-04 21:19 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-05 16:47 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-05 09:00 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-04 21:26 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-04 21:46 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-04 21:52 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-04 22:49 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 09:43 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-04 16:59 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-04 23:57 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 01:17 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-05 16:46 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 23:32 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-04 20:53 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 18:33 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-05 14:19 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 19:34 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-05 17:25 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 22:34 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-05 02:47 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 06:32 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-06 11:58 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 17:52 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-06 15:46 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 18:54 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-05 22:12 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 19:16 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 21:00 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-06 16:36 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-06 17:20 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 10:00 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 12:49 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-05 17:58 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 10:33 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-05 15:58 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-06 13:41 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 23:29 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-07 21:14 +0100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-07 12:35 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-08 10:04 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-05 19:10 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-05 03:53 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-05 09:05 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 13:31 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-05 14:24 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 06:36 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-02-05 20:50 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-06 09:28 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-07 21:50 +0100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-08 17:32 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-07 21:50 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 09:26 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 06:43 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-06 11:42 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 09:55 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 10:18 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 09:51 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 17:23 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-07 08:58 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-06 15:08 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-07 13:11 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-06 16:27 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-07 10:59 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-07 13:13 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-06 17:37 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-02-07 02:15 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 14:06 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-05 13:57 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 17:07 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-05 15:10 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 09:16 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 06:39 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 10:00 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 10:12 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 12:51 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 12:19 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 18:18 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 17:33 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-06 12:33 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-06 09:23 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 23:04 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 10:07 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 12:20 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-05 16:07 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 18:24 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 16:56 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 20:04 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-06 14:47 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-05 22:03 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-06 17:17 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-06 08:02 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-06 11:53 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-07 22:15 +0100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-02-05 21:05 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 14:19 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-02-05 22:31 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 17:28 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 23:11 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-02-06 02:22 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-06 13:54 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-06 09:53 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-06 11:57 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-06 09:56 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-06 11:47 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism android <here@there.was> - 2014-02-06 20:05 +0100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-06 13:03 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-06 16:19 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-06 16:34 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-06 16:33 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-06 17:39 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-07 04:37 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-02-06 20:10 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-06 16:30 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-02-06 17:21 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-06 16:35 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 18:29 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 23:08 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 17:30 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 10:32 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-02-05 20:57 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-06 11:59 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 20:12 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-02-05 17:46 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-06 16:10 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-06 08:00 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-06 09:21 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 10:09 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 01:20 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 09:12 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-06 09:19 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 14:14 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 23:02 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 18:26 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-06 13:35 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 18:19 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-06 14:05 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-06 09:37 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-07 04:48 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 17:22 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-05 10:02 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-04 23:19 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-04 23:56 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-05 13:59 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-05 12:52 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-05 09:09 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-06 11:35 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 10:16 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-05 16:55 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-05 17:00 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-06 12:22 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-05 09:05 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 12:51 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-07 18:32 +0100
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-08 08:31 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-07 17:07 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-08 11:52 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-08 10:38 +1100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-11 06:52 +0100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-04 13:28 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-04 08:50 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 11:05 -0800
Re: Malware help and skepticism Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-04 19:20 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-05 08:53 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-07 19:39 +0100
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-08 09:40 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-03 18:31 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 13:01 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-04 11:36 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-04 14:11 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-05 09:06 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-05 09:39 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-04 21:22 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-05 01:07 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Suze <replytome@thenewsgroup.com> - 2014-02-01 08:03 -0600
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-01 09:08 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism dcohenspam@talktalk.net (Daniel Cohen) - 2014-02-01 20:47 +0000
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-01 16:41 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-02-02 11:27 +1300
Re: Malware help and skepticism "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2014-02-02 15:05 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-01 07:55 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-01 11:22 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-01 20:10 -0700
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-01 10:36 -0500
Re: Malware help and skepticism Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-01 10:30 -0500
Page 6 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 14 Next page →
| From | dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-05 14:19 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <do_ray_me-D8A29D.14195105022014@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #55930 |
In article <8wzjm6s2yv.fsf@ethel.the.log>, Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> wrote: > JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> writes: > > > On 14-02-04 16:59, Alan Browne wrote: > > > > > Hardly minor. Hoffman was a very fine actor (stage and screen) who took > > > on difficult and unusual roles. > > > > I've never seen Hoffman outside a movie. But within movies, he had a > > certain attitude I disliked (a certain snob, swaggart aspect) , and I > > based my opinion of the actor based on what I saw on screen. > > That's a mistake. > > What they do is called "acting" because they are pretending to be the > character who they are portraying. > > It is true that there are some famous "actors" whose schtick involves > just walking through their roles being themselves. Hoffman was not > one of these and his roles are incredibly varied. > You are both right in a way, but there is an in-between. Some actors bring a lot of themselves into their roles, others do a pretty good job of being anything but. ... > > His roles in Doubt, Capote, 25th Hour, Magnolia, Boogie Nights are all > completely different from each other, all completely convincing, and > none of them "snob" or "swaggart." He certainly played his fair share of quite unpleasant characters, perhaps that is hard for some people to dissociate themselves from. -- dorayme
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-04 19:34 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2qtxces05s.fsf@ethel.the.log> |
| In reply to | #55931 |
dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> writes: > In article <8wzjm6s2yv.fsf@ethel.the.log>, > Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> wrote: > > > JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> writes: > > > > > On 14-02-04 16:59, Alan Browne wrote: > > > > > > > Hardly minor. Hoffman was a very fine actor (stage and screen) who took > > > > on difficult and unusual roles. > > > > > > I've never seen Hoffman outside a movie. But within movies, he had a > > > certain attitude I disliked (a certain snob, swaggart aspect) , and I > > > based my opinion of the actor based on what I saw on screen. > > > > That's a mistake. > > > > What they do is called "acting" because they are pretending to be the > > character who they are portraying. > > > > It is true that there are some famous "actors" whose schtick involves > > just walking through their roles being themselves. Hoffman was not > > one of these and his roles are incredibly varied. > > You are both right in a way, but there is an in-between. Some actors > bring a lot of themselves into their roles, others do a pretty good > job of being anything but. I think _good_ actors are good precisely because they can play characters who are not like themselves. That other thing, to paraphrase Truman Capote, is not acting, it's being. > > His roles in Doubt, Capote, 25th Hour, Magnolia, Boogie Nights are all > > completely different from each other, all completely convincing, and > > none of them "snob" or "swaggart." > > He certainly played his fair share of quite unpleasant characters, > perhaps that is hard for some people to dissociate themselves from. Yep. Well, he never had the looks to play a Hollywood leading man. Plus he was good enough and lucky enough to get a lot of really interesting, complex roles.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-05 17:25 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <do_ray_me-450FC0.17251005022014@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #55932 |
In article <2qtxces05s.fsf@ethel.the.log>, Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> wrote: > dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> writes: > ... > > > > ... there is an in-between. Some actors > > bring a lot of themselves into their roles, others do a pretty good > > job of being anything but. > > I think _good_ actors are good precisely because they can play > characters who are not like themselves. > > That other thing, to paraphrase Truman Capote, is not acting, it's > being. > You are reverting to black and white thinking, was it you that accused nospam of this at one stage! As I said, there is something in between. Everyone is a bit like everyone else in some respects, sometimes there are gulfs to be crossed and yes, a good actor crosses these gulfs. But interesting actors can also bring some of the parts of themselves to their roles. -- dorayme
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-04 22:34 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <1r61ouysni.fsf@ethel.the.log> |
| In reply to | #55937 |
dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> writes: > In article <2qtxces05s.fsf@ethel.the.log>, > Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> wrote: > > > dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> writes: > > > ... > > > > > > > ... there is an in-between. Some actors > > > bring a lot of themselves into their roles, others do a pretty good > > > job of being anything but. > > > > I think _good_ actors are good precisely because they can play > > characters who are not like themselves. > > > > That other thing, to paraphrase Truman Capote, is not acting, it's > > being. > > > > You are reverting to black and white thinking, was it you that accused > nospam of this at one stage! Not sure what you mean by black and white thinking in this context, or what this has to do with nospam (who is more of a sophist than a black-and-white thinker). Good actors inhabit their characters and show the characters to the audience (not the actor's personality). Competent actors can behave like their characters _if_ their characters are like themselves. Bad actors don't behave like real people at all (yes, I mean you, Keanu Reeves). It isn't black and white - it's a range. What I _am_ saying is that thinking an actor is a snob because they played a part that is supposed to be a snob is simply a mistake. Just like Julia Roberts isn't really a hooker, and George Clooney isn't really a doctor. > As I said, there is something in between. Everyone is a bit like > everyone else in some respects, Yes, that's true. > sometimes there are gulfs to be > crossed and yes, a good actor crosses these gulfs. Also true. > But interesting actors can also bring some of the parts of themselves > to their roles. Also true - in fact I suspect that one of the secrets is identifying things in your character that you can see in yourself. Nevertheless, it is a mistake to watch a great actor and think you are seeing that actor's personality in the character he or she is playing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-05 02:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <52f1ec8b$0$12676$c3e8da3$69010069@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #55938 |
On 14-02-05 01:34, Doug Anderson wrote: > Competent actors can behave like their characters _if_ their > characters are like themselves. However, there is something about their body and voice which does tend to transcend any acting they do and offer a constant "look and feel" across roles. And I think this is what I got from the few movies of Hoffman I saw. (and I only saw a few). Their physique also tends to typecast them into certain roles. One would not cast Hoffman as the athletic type in an action movie. I just checked imdb. The only movies I remember watching with him in it: Twister (he was much younger) Talented Ripley ( mellow guy who likes jazz and appears to always be high) Mission Impossible III (bad guy). So while I guess I shouldn't typecast him at all because this is a very small representation of his work. But I still get the impression that his role in Ripley reflected the real person most. And when you factor that he was a drug user, perhaps it was the best representation (smooth talking slow moving guy who likes Jazz and appears to always be high). One huge surprise for me I discovered a year or two ago happened when watching "The Undiscovered Country". The young vulcan traitor had a familiar voice. I checked on IMDB and low and behold, it was Samatha from Sex and the City. Couldn't be more different ! But because of dress/hair/makeup (and age difference) Kim Catrall was not the same person physically in the two movies. So it becomes very easy to never make the association between different roles. It is also interesting that in ST-6, Katrall appears short, while in Sex in the City, she appeared tall. And she gets an award for best award reception speech "you don't know how many men I've had to sleep with to get this award". When I see an actor, I tend to try to figure out if I would like to meet her/him. So yeah, I type cast the person based on certain maneurisms and facial expresions/voice when they are acting.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-05 06:32 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <3ssirx1vgp.fsf@ethel.the.log> |
| In reply to | #55946 |
JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> writes: > On 14-02-05 01:34, Doug Anderson wrote: > > > Competent actors can behave like their characters _if_ their > > characters are like themselves. > > However, there is something about their body and voice which does tend > to transcend any acting they do and offer a constant "look and feel" > across roles. Sure. Hoffman was overweight for example. His voice is very different in different roles - I honestly don't know if you heard Hoffman's voice in "The Savages" and his voice in "Charlie Wilson's War" without seeing him if you'd notice they were the same actor. In fact, even _with_ seeing them, you might not notice they are the same actor. > And I think this is what I got from the few movies of > Hoffman I saw. (and I only saw a few). Their physique also tends to > typecast them into certain roles. One would not cast Hoffman as the > athletic type in an action movie. > > > I just checked imdb. The only movies I remember watching with him in it: > Twister (he was much younger) > Talented Ripley ( mellow guy who likes jazz and appears to always be high) > Mission Impossible III (bad guy). > > So while I guess I shouldn't typecast him at all because this is a very > small representation of his work. But I still get the impression that > his role in Ripley reflected the real person most. You could be right - who knows? All I'm saying is that he's played many _very_ different characters. The original assertion was that he was a snob and swaggart. I'm not sure what that second word means, but these assertions have nothing to do with who he actually was - only to do with the roles that the person has seen him in. > And when you factor > that he was a drug user, perhaps it was the best representation (smooth > talking slow moving guy who likes Jazz and appears to always be high). > > One huge surprise for me I discovered a year or two ago happened when > watching "The Undiscovered Country". The young vulcan traitor had a > familiar voice. I checked on IMDB and low and behold, it was Samatha > from Sex and the City. Couldn't be more different ! But because of > dress/hair/makeup (and age difference) Kim Catrall was not the same > person physically in the two movies. So it becomes very easy to never > make the association between different roles. It is also interesting > that in ST-6, Katrall appears short, while in Sex in the City, she > appeared tall. And she gets an award for best award reception speech > "you don't know how many men I've had to sleep with to get this award". > > When I see an actor, I tend to try to figure out if I would like to meet > her/him. So yeah, I type cast the person based on certain maneurisms and > facial expresions/voice when they are acting. I kind of do the opposite. Too often I've had the experience of really respecting an actor - because of how good they are, only to find out something about the real person that is disappointing. I'm looking at you, Elizabeth Moss (Scientologist) and you, Daniel Day Lewis (fake Pushkin scholar). If someone is a great actor I prefer to just think about them as a great actor and try not to worry about who they really are.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-06 11:58 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <do_ray_me-8EAB24.11582406022014@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #55966 |
In article <3ssirx1vgp.fsf@ethel.the.log>, Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> wrote: > If someone is a great actor I prefer to just think about them as a > great actor and try not to worry about who they really are. I dream of a time when there are no actors, that it is all done by film makers (the visuals like painters do visuals, sometimes photo-realistic; the sound like synthesisers do sound but much more sophisticated to include every possible human voice.) -- dorayme
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-05 17:52 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <36mwi5qa6g.fsf@ethel.the.log> |
| In reply to | #56080 |
dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> writes: > In article <3ssirx1vgp.fsf@ethel.the.log>, > Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> wrote: > > > If someone is a great actor I prefer to just think about them as a > > great actor and try not to worry about who they really are. > > I dream of a time when there are no actors, that it is all done by > film makers (the visuals like painters do visuals, sometimes > photo-realistic; the sound like synthesisers do sound but much more > sophisticated to include every possible human voice.) You, George Lucas and James Cameron.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-06 15:46 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <060220141546419357%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #56096 |
In article <36mwi5qa6g.fsf@ethel.the.log>, Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> wrote: > dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> writes: > > In article <3ssirx1vgp.fsf@ethel.the.log>, > > Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > If someone is a great actor I prefer to just think about them as a > > > great actor and try not to worry about who they really are. > > > > I dream of a time when there are no actors, that it is all done by > > film makers (the visuals like painters do visuals, sometimes > > photo-realistic; the sound like synthesisers do sound but much more > > sophisticated to include every possible human voice.) > > You, George Lucas and James Cameron. At the moment James Cameron still needs actors though (as do animation makers) ... George Lucas now only dreams of diving into his money bin full of cash Disney gave him, just like Scrooge McDuck: <http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mcqs5dYSuk1r8mcj2o1_500.jpg>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-05 18:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <8yha8dq7cf.fsf@ethel.the.log> |
| In reply to | #56103 |
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> writes: > In article <36mwi5qa6g.fsf@ethel.the.log>, Doug Anderson > <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> wrote: > > dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> writes: > > > In article <3ssirx1vgp.fsf@ethel.the.log>, > > > Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > If someone is a great actor I prefer to just think about them as a > > > > great actor and try not to worry about who they really are. > > > > > > I dream of a time when there are no actors, that it is all done by > > > film makers (the visuals like painters do visuals, sometimes > > > photo-realistic; the sound like synthesisers do sound but much more > > > sophisticated to include every possible human voice.) > > > > You, George Lucas and James Cameron. > > At the moment James Cameron still needs actors though (as do animation > makers) ... George Lucas now only dreams of diving into his money bin > full of cash Disney gave him, just like Scrooge McDuck: > <http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mcqs5dYSuk1r8mcj2o1_500.jpg> I don't think "acting" describes any events in Avatar or the recent trio of Star Wars movies. But in any case, you were relating your dream, and I'm pointing out that Lucas and Cameron have the same dream.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-05 22:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <52f2fd93$0$12644$c3e8da3$69010069@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #56104 |
On 14-02-05 21:54, Doug Anderson wrote: > I don't think "acting" describes any events in Avatar or the recent > trio of Star Wars movies. In the case of Avatar, there is some serious acting you don't realise is happening. Remember that the actors do not actually see what is happening because they are just moving in front of a green screen and everything else is added in CGI post production. In the case of the CGI bodies, it was still the actors moving and motion tracking was then applied to their CGI bodies. This isn't the "drama" acting that you expect of Oscar winning movies, but it is still acting because they have to pretend to be talking to some monster even though there is no monster in front of them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-05 19:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9zbnylq6br.fsf@ethel.the.log> |
| In reply to | #56109 |
JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> writes: > On 14-02-05 21:54, Doug Anderson wrote: > > > I don't think "acting" describes any events in Avatar or the recent > > trio of Star Wars movies. > > > In the case of Avatar, there is some serious acting you don't realise is > happening. I agree that there are people involved, but I don't think what they did constitutes serious acting. > Remember that the actors do not actually see what is > happening because they are just moving in front of a green screen and > everything else is added in CGI post production. > > In the case of the CGI bodies, it was still the actors moving and motion > tracking was then applied to their CGI bodies. > > This isn't the "drama" acting that you expect of Oscar winning movies, > but it is still acting because they have to pretend to be talking to > some monster even though there is no monster in front of them. "Pretending." Good word. That wasn't acting, it was pretending.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-05 21:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <050220142100537119%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #56111 |
In article <9zbnylq6br.fsf@ethel.the.log>, Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> wrote: > "Pretending." Good word. That wasn't acting, it was pretending. When it comes down to it acting is pretending; it's a matter of degree, how well one pretends.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-06 16:36 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <do_ray_me-9B1CB9.16362106022014@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #56115 |
In article <050220142100537119%michelle@michelle.org>, Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: > In article <9zbnylq6br.fsf@ethel.the.log>, Doug Anderson > <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> wrote: > > > "Pretending." Good word. That wasn't acting, it was pretending. > > When it comes down to it acting is pretending; it's a matter of degree, > how well one pretends. You can say the actor is pretending to cry or be angry but it would not reflect what really goes on. Maybe no actors can do some angry scenes or sad scenes well without *getting* angry or sad. "Pretence" glosses over the realities. -- dorayme
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-06 17:20 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <060220141720019974%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #56109 |
In article <52f2fd93$0$12644$c3e8da3$69010069@news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > On 14-02-05 21:54, Doug Anderson wrote: > > > > I don't think "acting" describes any events in Avatar or the recent > > trio of Star Wars movies. > > In the case of Avatar, there is some serious acting you don't realise is > happening. Remember that the actors do not actually see what is > happening because they are just moving in front of a green screen and > everything else is added in CGI post production. > > In the case of the CGI bodies, it was still the actors moving and motion > tracking was then applied to their CGI bodies. > > This isn't the "drama" acting that you expect of Oscar winning movies, > but it is still acting because they have to pretend to be talking to > some monster even though there is no monster in front of them. Even in the Star Wars Prequel Trilogy, real actors filmed the roles the CGI characters would be used for - the scene was usualy filmed with the actor stand-in and then re-filmed without the stand-in. The stand-in gave the other actors a visual reference for eye-lines, etc, and gave the animators a reference for things like shadows being cast.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-05 10:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <050220141000058109%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #55946 |
In article <52f1ec8b$0$12676$c3e8da3$69010069@news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > So yeah, I type cast the person based on certain maneurisms and > facial expresions/voice when they are acting. Well, there are some actors who, regardless of what part they're acting, are actually playing the same character. William Shatner comes to mind.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-05 12:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <52f279b9$0$12532$c3e8da3$69010069@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #55983 |
In article <050220141000058109%michelle@michelle.org>, Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: > In article <52f1ec8b$0$12676$c3e8da3$69010069@news.astraweb.com>, JF > Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > > > So yeah, I type cast the person based on certain maneurisms and > > facial expresions/voice when they are acting. > > Well, there are some actors who, regardless of what part they're > acting, are actually playing the same character. William Shatner comes > to mind. I've always said that about Jack Nicholson. -- Where's the Vangelis music? Pris' tongue is sticking out in in the wide shot after Batty has kissed her. They have put back more tits into the Zhora dressing room scene. -- notes for Blade Runner
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-05 17:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <blfcduF38bqU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #55996 |
On 2014-02-05, Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote: > In article <050220141000058109%michelle@michelle.org>, > Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: > >> In article <52f1ec8b$0$12676$c3e8da3$69010069@news.astraweb.com>, JF >> Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: >> >> > So yeah, I type cast the person based on certain maneurisms and >> > facial expresions/voice when they are acting. >> >> Well, there are some actors who, regardless of what part they're >> acting, are actually playing the same character. William Shatner comes >> to mind. > > I've always said that about Jack Nicholson. Pacino comes to mind. The list is large. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-05 10:33 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <daiosts92k.fsf@ethel.the.log> |
| In reply to | #55983 |
Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> writes: > In article <52f1ec8b$0$12676$c3e8da3$69010069@news.astraweb.com>, JF > Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > > > So yeah, I type cast the person based on certain maneurisms and > > facial expresions/voice when they are acting. > > Well, there are some actors who, regardless of what part they're > acting, are actually playing the same character. William Shatner comes > to mind. Right. And although he has done a number of things well, I think I'd be hard pressed to call Shatner a good actor.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-05 15:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <52f2a5ef$0$34972$c3e8da3$460562f1@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #56007 |
On 14-02-05 13:33, Doug Anderson wrote: >> Well, there are some actors who, regardless of what part they're >> acting, are actually playing the same character. William Shatner comes >> to mind. > > Right. And although he has done a number of things well, I think I'd > be hard pressed to call Shatner a good actor. A number of others were also listed like Pacino etc. Perhaps they are good actors, but not versatile actors as they are very good only in a fairly narrow range of roles. There is typecasting from previous movies, but also I think typecasting due to body and voice. Certain persons have bodies or voices which simply cannot be believable in certain roles. A tall, athletic guy with deep voice wouldn't be believable in a role where he is bullied at school no matter how good an actor he is. There are actors whose bodies and voices are more "vanilla" and thus are bvelieable in a wider range of roles. Animated is interesting because you can get surprised who who voices a character. Fry in "Futurama" sounded like a young guy in his 20s. Yet, the person who voiced him was in his 60s by the time the show ended.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web