Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #54360 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-01-05 08:52 -0800 |
| Last post | 2014-01-13 15:36 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 70 — 19 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-01-05 08:52 -0800
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2014-01-05 11:55 -0500
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-01-05 19:35 -0500
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2014-01-05 19:55 -0500
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-01-06 16:06 +1300
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-01-10 17:42 -0500
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-01-05 22:56 -0800
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-01-06 03:34 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-01-05 22:58 -0800
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-01-06 12:04 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2014-01-05 12:06 -0500
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-01-05 13:00 -0500
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-01-05 10:11 -0800
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-01-05 13:42 -0500
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2014-01-05 13:53 -0500
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2014-01-05 12:13 -0800
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-01-06 09:24 +1300
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-01-05 15:31 -0500
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2014-01-05 22:08 -0500
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-01-06 16:26 +1300
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-01-06 03:36 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Larry Gusaas <larry.gusaas@gmail.com> - 2014-01-05 14:20 -0600
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2014-01-05 16:20 -0800
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-01-06 03:37 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2014-01-05 22:43 -0800
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2014-01-06 21:32 -0700
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2014-01-10 13:38 -0800
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-01-07 08:38 -0500
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-01-07 13:41 -0500
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-01-07 15:18 -0500
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-01-08 03:09 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-01-07 22:56 -0500
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-01-08 01:44 -0500
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-01-08 18:30 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-01-09 09:03 +1300
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2014-01-10 13:47 -0800
Re: Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-01-10 19:51 -0500
Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... billy@MIX.COM - 2014-01-07 03:02 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-01-07 06:18 -0800
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... billy@MIX.COM - 2014-01-09 17:20 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-01-09 23:25 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-01-10 11:44 -0800
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... billy@MIX.COM - 2014-01-11 19:06 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-01-09 19:14 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2014-01-09 22:29 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-01-10 09:28 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2014-01-10 10:25 -0500
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-01-11 07:26 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2014-01-11 10:50 -0500
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-01-11 13:57 -0800
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-01-11 22:24 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-01-11 23:10 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-01-11 15:12 -0800
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-01-12 00:28 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2014-01-11 17:54 -0800
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-01-12 01:57 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-01-12 09:17 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-01-12 22:05 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-01-12 04:56 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-01-12 05:16 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-01-12 18:38 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-01-12 22:07 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2014-01-12 22:28 -0500
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-01-13 14:51 +1100
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-01-13 04:28 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-01-13 05:46 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2014-01-13 02:49 -0500
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... billy@MIX.COM - 2014-01-13 15:48 +0000
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-01-14 00:41 -0800
Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... billy@MIX.COM - 2014-01-13 15:36 +0000
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
| From | Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-05 08:52 -0800 |
| Subject | Is it OK/safe to put a MacBook Pro to a long sleep/hibernation (close its lid) and moving it for a long time (e.g., over a day) instead of powering off? |
| Message-ID | <1oqdnf9Iu-cmEFTPnZ2dnUVZ_qidnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
Hello.
I noticed my client did not shut down his MacBook Pro today since
opening its lid up resulted the login screen instead of the usual boot
up from powering on. Its battery life was still high (91%) so that
wasn't bad, but is it really a good idea to put it to sleep/hibernation
for that long though especially when transporting it around like in
luggages? I can understand if it is a few minutes and hours for short
moves or idling, but days and moving around?
Thank you in advance. :)
--
"The ants are a people not strong, yet they prepare their meat in the
summer." --Proverbs 30:25 (Bible)
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
/ /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
| |o o| |
\ _ / If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed.
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-05 11:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <barmar-E7ED77.11555005012014@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #54360 |
In article <1oqdnf9Iu-cmEFTPnZ2dnUVZ_qidnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote: > Hello. > > I noticed my client did not shut down his MacBook Pro today since > opening its lid up resulted the login screen instead of the usual boot > up from powering on. Its battery life was still high (91%) so that > wasn't bad, but is it really a good idea to put it to sleep/hibernation > for that long though especially when transporting it around like in > luggages? I can understand if it is a few minutes and hours for short > moves or idling, but days and moving around? > > Thank you in advance. :) I've put Macbooks to sleep for weeks at a time with little problem. -- Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-05 19:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <52c9fa40$0$58606$c3e8da3$12bcf670@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #54363 |
On 14-01-05 11:55, Barry Margolin wrote: >> I noticed my client did not shut down his MacBook Pro today since >> opening its lid up resulted the login screen instead of the usual boot >> up from powering on. When, during sleep, batteries go below a certain point, the laptop will spin up the disk, save memory to the disk and do a full shutdown to preserve batteries. When you then power up (with the power button), you get a special power up mode where it restores the RAM content from disk and continues where it left off. (not a real reboot).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-05 19:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <barmar-EDD275.19550605012014@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #54402 |
In article <52c9fa40$0$58606$c3e8da3$12bcf670@news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > On 14-01-05 11:55, Barry Margolin wrote: Why would you reply to my message, snip everything I wrote, but leave the attribution referring to me instead of the attribution of the OP? > > >> I noticed my client did not shut down his MacBook Pro today since > >> opening its lid up resulted the login screen instead of the usual boot > >> up from powering on. > > When, during sleep, batteries go below a certain point, the laptop will > spin up the disk, save memory to the disk and do a full shutdown to > preserve batteries. > > When you then power up (with the power button), you get a special power > up mode where it restores the RAM content from disk and continues where > it left off. (not a real reboot). -- Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-06 16:06 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <060120141606024775%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #54404 |
In article <barmar-EDD275.19550605012014@news.eternal-september.org>, Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > In article <52c9fa40$0$58606$c3e8da3$12bcf670@news.astraweb.com>, > JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > > > On 14-01-05 11:55, Barry Margolin wrote: > > Why would you reply to my message, snip everything I wrote, but leave > the attribution referring to me instead of the attribution of the OP? A. It's easy to do by accident, especially if you're in a hurry. and B. Perhaps the original message didn't show up on his server (yet).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-10 17:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <-PydnXaPM8Xe6k3PnZ2dnUVZ_rWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #54404 |
On 2014.01.05, 19:55 , Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article <52c9fa40$0$58606$c3e8da3$12bcf670@news.astraweb.com>,
> JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:
>
>> On 14-01-05 11:55, Barry Margolin wrote:
>
> Why would you reply to my message, snip everything I wrote, but leave
> the attribution referring to me instead of the attribution of the OP?
bad habits of JF include the above and better yet: complete strip and
answering with a change of context.
--
“Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face.”
- Mike Tyson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-05 22:56 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <JYWdndYxhIMmzlfPnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #54402 |
On 1/5/2014 4:35 PM PT, JF Mezei typed:
>>> I noticed my client did not shut down his MacBook Pro today since
>>> opening its lid up resulted the login screen instead of the usual boot
>>> up from powering on.
>
> When, during sleep, batteries go below a certain point, the laptop will
> spin up the disk, save memory to the disk and do a full shutdown to
> preserve batteries.
>
> When you then power up (with the power button), you get a special power
> up mode where it restores the RAM content from disk and continues where
> it left off. (not a real reboot).
Ah, so unsaved works will still be there. Nice. :)
--
"Though your enemy is the size of an ant, look upon him as an elephant."
--Danish
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
/ /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
| |o o| |
\ _ / If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed.
A song is/was playing on this computer: Eighth Wonder - I'm Not Scared
(Dance/Disco Mix)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-06 03:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnlck91b.1934.g.kreme@amelia.local> |
| In reply to | #54363 |
In message <barmar-E7ED77.11555005012014@news.eternal-september.org> Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > In article <1oqdnf9Iu-cmEFTPnZ2dnUVZ_qidnZ2d@earthlink.com>, > Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote: >> Hello. >> >> I noticed my client did not shut down his MacBook Pro today since >> opening its lid up resulted the login screen instead of the usual boot >> up from powering on. Its battery life was still high (91%) so that >> wasn't bad, but is it really a good idea to put it to sleep/hibernation >> for that long though especially when transporting it around like in >> luggages? I can understand if it is a few minutes and hours for short >> moves or idling, but days and moving around? >> >> Thank you in advance. :) > I've put Macbooks to sleep for weeks at a time with little problem. Little? How about none? I have a 2009 MacBook Pro that I am using right now that to the best of my knowledge has only ever been shutdown to have RAM added and an SSD put in. Other than changing the hardware I can't think of a single reason to ever shutdown a MacBook. -- Quis custodiet opsos custodes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-05 22:58 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <JYWdndExhINnzlfPnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #54414 |
On 1/5/2014 7:34 PM PT, Lewis typed:
> Little? How about none? I have a 2009 MacBook Pro that I am using right
> now that to the best of my knowledge has only ever been shutdown to have
> RAM added and an SSD put in. Other than changing the hardware I can't
> think of a single reason to ever shutdown a MacBook.
Major software and firmware upgrades?
--
"Trivial hurts, tiny human accidents," said Firenze, as his hooves
thudded over the mossy floor. "These are of no more significance than
the scurryings of ants to the wide universe, and are unaffected by
planetary movements." --Harry Potter book
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
/ /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
| |o o| |
\ _ / If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed.
A song is/was playing on this computer: Eighth Wonder - I'm Not Scared
(Dance/Disco Mix)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-06 12:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnlcl6ta.20rf.g.kreme@amelia.local> |
| In reply to | #54424 |
In message <JYWdndExhINnzlfPnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@earthlink.com> Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote: > On 1/5/2014 7:34 PM PT, Lewis typed: >> Little? How about none? I have a 2009 MacBook Pro that I am using right >> now that to the best of my knowledge has only ever been shutdown to have >> RAM added and an SSD put in. Other than changing the hardware I can't >> think of a single reason to ever shutdown a MacBook. > Major software and firmware upgrades? Just a restart in those cases. -- Mos Eisley spaceport. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-05 12:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <lac3f6$anb$1@news.datemas.de> |
| In reply to | #54360 |
On 2014-01-05 16:52:05 +0000, Ant said: > Hello. > > I noticed my client did not shut down his MacBook Pro today since > opening its lid up resulted the login screen instead of the usual boot > up from powering on. Its battery life was still high (91%) so that > wasn't bad, but is it really a good idea to put it to sleep/hibernation > for that long though especially when transporting it around like in > luggages? I can understand if it is a few minutes and hours for short > moves or idling, but days and moving around? > > Thank you in advance. :) Absolutely safe. I do it all the time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-05 13:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <050120141300061741%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #54360 |
In article <1oqdnf9Iu-cmEFTPnZ2dnUVZ_qidnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote: > Hello. > > I noticed my client did not shut down his MacBook Pro today since > opening its lid up resulted the login screen instead of the usual boot > up from powering on. Its battery life was still high (91%) so that > wasn't bad, but is it really a good idea to put it to sleep/hibernation > for that long though especially when transporting it around like in > luggages? I can understand if it is a few minutes and hours for short > moves or idling, but days and moving around? it's designed to sleep rather than shut down. if you are going to have it off for a few weeks, then shut it down, since there is a very small amount of battery drain in sleep (a little more than the self-discharge rate) and it will eventually shut itself off anyway. if you shut it down first, then you control when it shuts down.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-05 10:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6fqdnaa-I8fePVTPnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #54369 |
On 1/5/2014 10:00 AM PT, nospam typed:
> it's designed to sleep rather than shut down.
>
> if you are going to have it off for a few weeks, then shut it down,
> since there is a very small amount of battery drain in sleep (a little
> more than the self-discharge rate) and it will eventually shut itself
> off anyway. if you shut it down first, then you control when it shuts
> down.
So even when transporting like (commut/travell)ing, it will be OK and
safe? Interesting.
--
"The great companies did not know that the line between hunger and anger
is a thin line. And money that might have gone to wages went for gas,
for guns, for agents and spies, for blacklists, for drilling. On the
highways the people moved like ants and searched for work, for food. And
the anger began to ferment." --John Steinbeck's The Grapes of Wrath
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
/ /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
| |o o| |
\ _ / If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed.
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-05 13:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <050120141342103156%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #54371 |
In article <6fqdnaa-I8fePVTPnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote: > So even when transporting like (commut/travell)ing, it will be OK and > safe? Interesting. having to shut down all the time would be a pain in the ass.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-05 13:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <lac9mt$ldn$1@news.datemas.de> |
| In reply to | #54371 |
On 2014-01-05 18:11:15 +0000, Ant said: > On 1/5/2014 10:00 AM PT, nospam typed: > >> it's designed to sleep rather than shut down. >> >> if you are going to have it off for a few weeks, then shut it down, >> since there is a very small amount of battery drain in sleep (a little >> more than the self-discharge rate) and it will eventually shut itself >> off anyway. if you shut it down first, then you control when it shuts >> down. > > So even when transporting like (commut/travell)ing, it will be OK and > safe? Interesting. What made you think it wouldn't be in the first place? Hard drives have "parked" their heads when the are powered down for a long time now and with the fans, those are the only moving parts in a laptop.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-05 12:13 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <laced8$oho$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #54371 |
In article <6fqdnaa-I8fePVTPnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote: > On 1/5/2014 10:00 AM PT, nospam typed: > > > it's designed to sleep rather than shut down. > > > > if you are going to have it off for a few weeks, then shut it down, > > since there is a very small amount of battery drain in sleep (a little > > more than the self-discharge rate) and it will eventually shut itself > > off anyway. if you shut it down first, then you control when it shuts > > down. > > So even when transporting like (commut/travell)ing, it will be OK and > safe? Interesting. Why wouldn't it be???? Except for the technicality that it's keeping the RAM refreshed and watching for a "time to wake up" signal, there's very nearly no difference between "asleep" and "powered off". -- Security provided by Mssrs Smith and/or Wesson. Brought to you by the letter Q
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-06 09:24 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <060120140924278909%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #54379 |
In article <laced8$oho$1@dont-email.me>, Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> wrote: > In article <6fqdnaa-I8fePVTPnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, > Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote: > > On 1/5/2014 10:00 AM PT, nospam typed: > > > > > > it's designed to sleep rather than shut down. > > > > > > if you are going to have it off for a few weeks, then shut it down, > > > since there is a very small amount of battery drain in sleep (a little > > > more than the self-discharge rate) and it will eventually shut itself > > > off anyway. if you shut it down first, then you control when it shuts > > > down. > > > > So even when transporting like (commut/travell)ing, it will be OK and > > safe? Interesting. > > Why wouldn't it be???? Except for the technicality that it's keeping the > RAM refreshed and watching for a "time to wake up" signal, there's very > nearly no difference between "asleep" and "powered off". Then there's also no reason not to simply power it off instead. :-) Realistically the only reason not to switch a computer off when it won't be used for a while is because impatient fools can't wait the extra few seconds for the computer to shutdown or reboot. :-\
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-05 15:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <050120141531226293%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #54381 |
In article <060120140924278909%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: > Then there's also no reason not to simply power it off instead. :-) yes there is. power off is only needed for storage or moving a computer that plugs into the wall. > Realistically the only reason not to switch a computer off when it > won't be used for a while is because impatient fools can't wait the > extra few seconds for the computer to shutdown or reboot. :-\ it's more than a few seconds to boot, but regardless, instant trumps a delay.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-05 22:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <lad6n7$nit$1@news.datemas.de> |
| In reply to | #54381 |
On 2014-01-05 20:24:27 +0000, Your Name said: > In article <laced8$oho$1@dont-email.me>, Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> > wrote: >> In article <6fqdnaa-I8fePVTPnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, >> Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote: >>> On 1/5/2014 10:00 AM PT, nospam typed: >>>> >>>> it's designed to sleep rather than shut down. >>>> >>>> if you are going to have it off for a few weeks, then shut it down, >>>> since there is a very small amount of battery drain in sleep (a little >>>> more than the self-discharge rate) and it will eventually shut itself >>>> off anyway. if you shut it down first, then you control when it shuts >>>> down. >>> >>> So even when transporting like (commut/travell)ing, it will be OK and >>> safe? Interesting. >> >> Why wouldn't it be???? Except for the technicality that it's keeping the >> RAM refreshed and watching for a "time to wake up" signal, there's very >> nearly no difference between "asleep" and "powered off". > > Then there's also no reason not to simply power it off instead. :-) Of course there is: time to usable state. > > Realistically the only reason not to switch a computer off when it > won't be used for a while is because impatient fools can't wait the > extra few seconds for the computer to shutdown or reboot. :-\
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-06 16:26 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <060120141626056928%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #54409 |
In article <lad6n7$nit$1@news.datemas.de>, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote: > On 2014-01-05 20:24:27 +0000, Your Name said: > > In article <laced8$oho$1@dont-email.me>, Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> > > wrote: > >> In article <6fqdnaa-I8fePVTPnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, > >> Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote: > >>> On 1/5/2014 10:00 AM PT, nospam typed: > >>>> > >>>> it's designed to sleep rather than shut down. > >>>> > >>>> if you are going to have it off for a few weeks, then shut it down, > >>>> since there is a very small amount of battery drain in sleep (a little > >>>> more than the self-discharge rate) and it will eventually shut itself > >>>> off anyway. if you shut it down first, then you control when it shuts > >>>> down. > >>> > >>> So even when transporting like (commut/travell)ing, it will be OK and > >>> safe? Interesting. > >> > >> Why wouldn't it be???? Except for the technicality that it's keeping the > >> RAM refreshed and watching for a "time to wake up" signal, there's very > >> nearly no difference between "asleep" and "powered off". > > > > Then there's also no reason not to simply power it off instead. :-) > > Of course there is: time to usable state. That's what I said below ... > > Realistically the only reason not to switch a computer off when it > > won't be used for a while is because impatient fools can't wait the > > extra few seconds for the computer to shutdown or reboot. :-\
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web