Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #133081

Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon")

From joe <none@domain.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.sys.mac.system
Subject Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon")
Date 2020-06-30 08:07 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <rdfdev$m6h$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <rdefs3$iit$1@news.mixmin.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On 6/29/2020 11:42 PM, Arlen Holder wrote:
> All verbatim (since Apologists _hate_ all facts about Apple products):
> 
>    "The _top_ score for Apple's new silicon at the time of this writing
>     is 844 for single-core and 2958 for multi-core, whereas a 4th-gen
>     iPad Pro scored 1118 for single-core and 4726 for multi-core."
> 
> o *A Wild Apple ARM Benchmark Appears*
> <https://gizmodo.com/a-wild-apple-arm-benchmark-appears-1844204355>
> 
>    "Beyond the iPad, the closest thing we have to compare to the alleged
>     dev kits at the moment are Intel cores... from mid-2020 MacBook Pro.
>     According Geekbench 5, one of the highest single-core scores is 1244,
>     and one of the highest multi-core scores is 4526. That Intel core is
>     running 400 MHz less per core than the Apple ARM dev kits, and has the
>     same number of cores, yet its performance is leaps and bounds ahead."
> 
> More details in the article...
> 

Breaking News:

AH points out that a low cost development platform is slower than a 
computer that costs 4 times as much.

AH has failed to show any performance claims for the transition kits 
that this data refutes.

AH ignores the fact that the A12z used in the transition kit is 2 years 
old and not the A14 that will be in Apple Silicon based Macs..

AH neglects to point out the slower results were obtained using x86 
tests translated to run on ARM; not native ARM code.

So, while he does post some 'facts', he makes no valid point.

The linked article uses "supposedly", "rumors ", and "If true,". It also 
indicates "Future Apple ARM processors are supposed to be souped-up 
versions of the A12Z, allegedly 12-cores with eight 
performance-dedicated cores". Given that, I fail to see how this article 
can provide a meaningful view of what to expect for the product to be 
released at the end of the year.


Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 04:42 +0000
  Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 04:50 +0000
    Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 05:02 +0000
  Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-06-30 00:38 -0700
  Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") joe <none@domain.invalid> - 2020-06-30 08:07 -0500
    Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-06-30 09:42 -0400
      Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") joe <none@domain.invalid> - 2020-06-30 09:39 -0500
      Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 17:16 +0000
      Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-30 18:08 +0000
        Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-06-30 14:26 -0400
          Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-06-30 12:25 -0700
            Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-30 22:38 +0000
          Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 23:58 +0000
    Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 16:56 +0000

csiph-web