Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #133081
| From | joe <none@domain.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.system |
| Subject | Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") |
| Date | 2020-06-30 08:07 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <rdfdev$m6h$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <rdefs3$iit$1@news.mixmin.net> |
On 6/29/2020 11:42 PM, Arlen Holder wrote: > All verbatim (since Apologists _hate_ all facts about Apple products): > > "The _top_ score for Apple's new silicon at the time of this writing > is 844 for single-core and 2958 for multi-core, whereas a 4th-gen > iPad Pro scored 1118 for single-core and 4726 for multi-core." > > o *A Wild Apple ARM Benchmark Appears* > <https://gizmodo.com/a-wild-apple-arm-benchmark-appears-1844204355> > > "Beyond the iPad, the closest thing we have to compare to the alleged > dev kits at the moment are Intel cores... from mid-2020 MacBook Pro. > According Geekbench 5, one of the highest single-core scores is 1244, > and one of the highest multi-core scores is 4526. That Intel core is > running 400 MHz less per core than the Apple ARM dev kits, and has the > same number of cores, yet its performance is leaps and bounds ahead." > > More details in the article... > Breaking News: AH points out that a low cost development platform is slower than a computer that costs 4 times as much. AH has failed to show any performance claims for the transition kits that this data refutes. AH ignores the fact that the A12z used in the transition kit is 2 years old and not the A14 that will be in Apple Silicon based Macs.. AH neglects to point out the slower results were obtained using x86 tests translated to run on ARM; not native ARM code. So, while he does post some 'facts', he makes no valid point. The linked article uses "supposedly", "rumors ", and "If true,". It also indicates "Future Apple ARM processors are supposed to be souped-up versions of the A12Z, allegedly 12-cores with eight performance-dedicated cores". Given that, I fail to see how this article can provide a meaningful view of what to expect for the product to be released at the end of the year.
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 04:42 +0000
Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 04:50 +0000
Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 05:02 +0000
Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-06-30 00:38 -0700
Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") joe <none@domain.invalid> - 2020-06-30 08:07 -0500
Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-06-30 09:42 -0400
Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") joe <none@domain.invalid> - 2020-06-30 09:39 -0500
Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 17:16 +0000
Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-30 18:08 +0000
Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-06-30 14:26 -0400
Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> - 2020-06-30 12:25 -0700
Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2020-06-30 22:38 +0000
Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 23:58 +0000
Re: First leaked reputed benchmarks for Apple ARM (aka what MARKETING is desperate for you to term "Apple Silicon") Arlen Holder <arlenholder@newmachine.com> - 2020-06-30 16:56 +0000
csiph-web