Re: Snit digest 454 / 2020-07-06

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups	alt.computer.workshop, comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, talk.politics.guns
Subject	Re: Snit digest 454 / 2020-07-06
Date	2020-07-12 06:46 +0000
Message-ID	<hmvpt8Fhl24U3@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(12 earlier) <XnsABF41C3D2D015HT1@f4EZwB2g0uUBKz22.8Sof8pxpeS2rFzUqv91pt7sP08TCGLp0A3L> <re4g5b$k8a$3@dont-email.me> <XnsABF6FA473290HT1@LK6l8elA9qX7.Oeo53IA54V55.00LsOQR> <re9skk$dm1$4@dont-email.me> <XnsABF8588C6B01HT1@5L62I6YTj3ma9Gx1Hf.mf3rGXeQ9ixnB3C05zGqC1580fREFf6t>

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Diesel <nobody@haph.org> wrote:
> Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none>
> news:re9skk$dm1$4@dont-email.me Fri, 10 Jul 2020 14:06:13 GMT in
> alt.computer.workshop, wrote: 
> 
>> On 2020-07-10, Diesel <nobody@haph.org> wrote:
>>> Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none>
>>> news:re4g5b$k8a$3@dont-email.me Wed, 08 Jul 2020 13:02:35 GMT in
>>> alt.computer.workshop, wrote: 
>>> 
>>>> On 2020-07-08, Diesel <nobody@haph.org> wrote:
>>>>> Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none>
>>>>> news:re1v5v$5s2$1@dont-email.me Tue, 07 Jul 2020 14:00:31 GMT
>>>>> in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 2020-07-07, David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 06/07/2020 09:36, Sandman wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <hmd8obFkccuU2@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> [2764] Sandman even was able to fake  IP addresses.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/ncvfhl2)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09):
>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> -- -- -------- 
>>>>>>>> troll            0/404 | lying            0/595 | incest  
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 0/2 sex              0/0   | honorable        0/9   |
>>>>>>>> honest           0/102 run              0/22  | css       
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 0/46  | tilde            0/0 proof            0/31  |
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> HTTP Response
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Final URL
>>>>>>> http://usenet.sandman.net/pages/trollcriteria/Lying
>>>>>>> Serving IP Address
>>>>>>> 94.247.170.170
>>>>>>> Status Code
>>>>>>> 200
>>>>>>> Body Length
>>>>>>> 18.59 KB
>>>>>>> Body SHA-256
>>>>>>> ae124c90bd9fc24a80833eecf5e4a8a0f3bbfe03ea31682d6c26c53d0f51ca
>>>>>>> 81 Headers
>>>>>>> connection     Upgrade, Keep-Alive
>>>>>>> content-length     19032
>>>>>>> content-type     text/html; charset=UTF-8
>>>>>>> date     Tue, 07 Jul 2020 07:39:15 GMT
>>>>>>> keep-alive     timeout=5, max=100
>>>>>>> server     Apache/2.4.38 (Debian)
>>>>>>> upgrade     h2,h2c
>>>>>>> vary     Accept-Encoding
>>>>>>> Trackers
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Google Analytics
>>>>>>> UA-579308-6 (https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js)
>>>>>>> HTML
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Title
>>>>>>> usenet
>>>>>>> Meta Tags
>>>>>>> author     Atlas CMS (www.eklundh.com)
>>>>>>> author-email     jonas@eklundh.com
>>>>>>> copyright     Jonas Eklundh (Sandman) @2020
>>>>>>> creation-time     0.620s
>>>>>>> description     lie
>>>>>>> generator     Atlas CMS (www.eklundh.com)
>>>>>>> generator-contact     jonas@eklundh.com
>>>>>>> keywords     Atlas,Innehållsystem,Jonas
>>>>>>> Eklundh,TV-tablåer,Spöa Sandman,Skicka
>>>>>>> vykort,Önskelista,DVD 
>>>>>>> samling,Krönikor,Myst,Riven,Uru,Ikoner,Ikon,Icon,MediaMac,Mac
>>>>>>> in to sh,Mac kort     CSM
>>>>>>> title     usenet
>>>>>>> viewport     width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0,
>>>>>>> maximum-scale=2.0 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You've done it! You busted Sandman's bot... that underscores
>>>>>> some reasons why what virtually everyone who has ever
>>>>>> interacted with Snit on usenet has labeled him, a liar, troll
>>>>>> worse ;): 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I've yet to label him. I've only written the truth concerning
>>>>> him. He's lied about me, several times now, and has attempted
>>>>> on several occasions now to project his own short comings
>>>>> (which is basically being nearly illiterate) on me. Oh, and
>>>>> lately, he makes wild threats of police. He claimed I should
>>>>> ask you about that, as I shake in my boots. <G>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> So, what if anything became of Snits efforts to involve police
>>>>> into the dispute you and he have?
>>>> 
>>>> There was no client, there was no call. This was a "psyche
>>>> degree" attempt by Snit to show he was able to 'back me off'...
>>>> of a thing I wasn't doing and hadn't *ever* done.
>>> 
>>> So, if I understand your reply correctly.. Snit just tried to
>>> totally bullshit me into thinking he called the cops on you with
>>> some result he expected that made you leave him alone or back off
>>> in some way shape or form. Do I understand you correctly? I don't
>>> want any possible confusion to have taken place.
>> 
>> I didn't see him claim to be the one contacting the police here
>> but, in the past, he worded it so as to suggest he did. When I
>> queried him on it he made sure to pin that on a "client". I
>> believe he said he'd show some "evidence" of an email he got from
>> this client, I suggest you take him up on that offer and see if
>> the client is willing to let anyone look at the "evidence" of my
>> *alleged* harassment of said client. IMO Snit made all of this up
>> for the reason I said, he wants readers to believe he's had some
>> sort of 'power' over me ;) 
> 
> No, he didn't directly claim he called anyone - he's inferred it 
> though with several replies to me now. That's why I asked if there 
> was any truth to his threats of police involvement to bail him out of 
> a situation he placed himself into that he can't get himself out of.
> 
> Heh, he doesn't even want me to take him up on the offer to show him 
> that I'm not BSing him. Did you see how quickly he changed his tune 
> when I accepted his nonsense and was going to pencil him in for a pen 
> test? :) "Oh, don't you touch me! I'll call the popo!!!" heh, cry me 
> a fucking river. Punkass little fuck thinks cops in another state 
> scare me... Oh...
>  
>> To clarify, I have never contacted any of Snit's clients, any
>> claim that I have done so is false, as are most of the claims Snit
>> makes about me. 
> 
> I don't doubt it.
>  
>> Why is this lie so important? IMO it's just another in a years
>> long stretch of them <shrug>. FWIW, you can find posts of me
>> pointing out inconsistencies in Snit's 'police story' (as you can
>> with most of his little stories).
> 
> It's not an important one, I was seeking further clarification mostly 
> for myself, because i've already read the other threads where you 
> swiss cheesed his claims previously about it.
>  
> 
> 
> 

Remember when you used to deny being used by Carroll as you are here?

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: P: David - the backdoor source code Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-05 05:54 +0000
  Re: P: David - the backdoor source code Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-04 23:02 -0700
    Re: P: David - the backdoor source code Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-05 09:06 +0000
    Snit digest 454 / 2020-07-06 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2020-07-06 08:36 +0000
      Re: Snit digest 454 / 2020-07-06 David_B <DavidB@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-07-07 08:42 +0100
        Re: Snit digest 454 / 2020-07-06 Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> - 2020-07-07 14:00 +0000
          Re: Snit digest 454 / 2020-07-06 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-07 09:11 -0500
            Re: Snit digest 454 / 2020-07-06 Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> - 2020-07-07 14:29 +0000
              Re: Snit digest 454 / 2020-07-06 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-07 09:45 -0500
                Re: Snit digest 454 / 2020-07-06 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-07 07:48 -0700
                Re: Snit digest 454 / 2020-07-06 Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> - 2020-07-07 14:56 +0000
          Re: Snit digest 454 / 2020-07-06 Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-08 06:41 +0000
            Re: Snit digest 454 / 2020-07-06 Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> - 2020-07-08 13:02 +0000
              Re: Snit digest 454 / 2020-07-06 Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-10 05:27 +0000
                Re: Snit digest 454 / 2020-07-06 Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> - 2020-07-10 14:06 +0000
                Re: Snit digest 454 / 2020-07-06 Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-07-12 04:27 +0000
                Re: Snit digest 454 / 2020-07-06 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-07-12 06:46 +0000

csiph-web