Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #53155

Re: wifi cameras?

From Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
Newsgroups comp.sys.mac.system
Subject Re: wifi cameras?
Date 2013-12-09 18:51 +1300
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <091220131851220670%YourName@YourISP.com> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <slrnla7pvf.u5u.g.kreme@mbp55.local> <dorayme-B7858F.16275408122013@news.albasani.net> <zi138zcwg4rl.1wdq48mpty7dt.dlg@40tude.net> <091220130918196522%YourName@YourISP.com> <dorayme-084579.10391609122013@news.albasani.net>

Show all headers | View raw

In article <dorayme-084579.10391609122013@news.albasani.net>, dorayme
<dorayme@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> In article <091220130918196522%YourName@YourISP.com>,
>  Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, 08 Dec 2013 16:27:55 +1100, dorayme wrote:
> > > 
> > > OK, on a scale of 0 to 10 how irritating is it? Let me give you an 
> > > idea of my ideal. On my Sony I connect via a USB cable. All I need do 
> > > is turn the camera on and it appears on my desktop. I would say that 
> > > was a 6 to 8 out of 10 depending on how irritating it is to find and 
> > > connect the cable.
> > 
> > Plugging in a USB cable?!?
> > Irritating factor: 2 out of 10 ... or less if you actually keep the
> > cable in the camera's bag.
> 
> If the desktop computer is the one you almost invariably use, keeping 
> cable near the usb port (or dongle adaptor) would seem sensible.

True, but keeping it (or second cable) in the camera's bag means you've
always got it whenever you are somewhere else.

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

wifi cameras? dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2013-12-07 14:25 +1100
  Re: wifi cameras? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-12-07 08:36 -0700
    Re: wifi cameras? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-12-07 10:51 -0500
      Re: wifi cameras? dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2013-12-08 07:55 +1100
        Re: wifi cameras? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-12-07 16:10 -0500
          Re: wifi cameras? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-07 19:20 -0500
            Re: wifi cameras? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-12-07 19:22 -0500
      Re: wifi cameras? Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2013-12-10 01:06 -0500
        Re: wifi cameras? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-09 22:16 -0800
        Re: wifi cameras? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-12-10 12:22 -0500
    Re: wifi cameras? dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2013-12-08 08:00 +1100
      Re: wifi cameras? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-12-07 16:10 -0500
    Re: wifi cameras? George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2013-12-07 15:56 -0600
  Re: wifi cameras? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-07 07:49 -0800
    Re: wifi cameras? dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2013-12-08 07:39 +1100
      Re: wifi cameras? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-07 13:35 -0800
        Re: wifi cameras? dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2013-12-08 09:30 +1100
          Re: wifi cameras? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-07 21:22 -0800
            Re: wifi cameras? dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2013-12-08 16:47 +1100
              Re: wifi cameras? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-08 04:52 -0800
  Re: wifi cameras? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-12-07 16:49 +0000
  Re: wifi cameras? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-08 03:30 +0000
    Re: wifi cameras? dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2013-12-08 16:27 +1100
      Re: wifi cameras? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-08 06:34 +0000
        Re: wifi cameras? dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2013-12-09 07:05 +1100
      Re: wifi cameras? Richard Wakeford <rwakefordfortynine@gmail.com> - 2013-12-08 09:58 +0100
        Re: wifi cameras? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-09 09:18 +1300
          Re: wifi cameras? dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2013-12-09 10:39 +1100
            Re: wifi cameras? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-09 18:51 +1300
              Re: wifi cameras? dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2013-12-09 17:43 +1100
                Re: wifi cameras? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-10 09:11 +1300
                Re: wifi cameras? dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2013-12-10 09:08 +1100
                Re: wifi cameras? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-12-10 13:40 +1300
          Re: wifi cameras? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-08 19:25 -0500
            Re: wifi cameras? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-09 00:32 +0000
              Re: wifi cameras? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2013-12-08 19:50 -0500
                Re: wifi cameras? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-09 15:53 +0000
                Re: wifi cameras? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-09 09:22 -0800
          Re: wifi cameras? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-09 00:31 +0000
            Re: wifi cameras? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-12-08 18:13 -0800
            Re: wifi cameras? George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2013-12-09 07:59 -0600
        Re: wifi cameras? dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2013-12-09 07:44 +1100

csiph-web