Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.laptops > #2103

Re: Not covered by warrenty because falsely claim liquid damage to motherboard.

From wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat)
Newsgroups comp.sys.laptops
Subject Re: Not covered by warrenty because falsely claim liquid damage to motherboard.
Date 2013-11-07 02:26 +0000
Organization Public Access Networks Corp.
Message-ID <l5etou$mh2$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink)
References <720d3$5278483a$cf3aab60$6055@news.flashnewsgroups.com> <alpine.LNX.2.02.1311051711260.31181@darkstar.example.org>

Show all headers | View raw


In article <alpine.LNX.2.02.1311051711260.31181@darkstar.example.org>,
Michael Black  <et472@ncf.ca> wrote:
>
>I've seen adults claim one thing to hide reality, so how do we know 
>spilled soda or something wasn't actually the case?
>

	Because a broken power jack is obvious: it's loose and moved back into
the case so you can't plug the charging cable in.  Usually happens because of
hauling the laptop across the bed by the power cord, or other trying to use 
it just a little too far from the outlet, etc.

	And you'd be surprised how many laptops work just fine for years after
attempted drownings in sweetened beverages.  I even saw one with dried 
chocolate milk inside it.  The complaint was "cd-rom don't work".  It didn't
work cause it was gummed up with chocolate milk.  Other than that it was fine.

Back to comp.sys.laptops | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Not covered by warrenty because falsely claim liquid damage to motherboard. jollyharry <91eed282a561b153be6ebcb2238f5a4e_6700@example.com> - 2013-11-05 01:22 +0000
  Re: Not covered by warrenty because falsely claim liquid damage to motherboard. "Don Phillipson" <e925@SPAMBLOCK.ncf.ca> - 2013-11-05 12:13 -0500
    Re: Not covered by warrenty because falsely claim liquid damage to motherboard. wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2013-11-07 02:22 +0000
  Re: Not covered by warrenty because falsely claim liquid damage to motherboard. Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2013-11-05 17:12 -0500
    Re: Not covered by warrenty because falsely claim liquid damage to motherboard. wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2013-11-07 02:26 +0000
  Re: Not covered by warrenty because falsely claim liquid damage to motherboard. wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2013-11-07 02:20 +0000

csiph-web