Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.laptops > #1842
| From | wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.laptops |
| Subject | Re: Lightweight Laptops??? |
| Date | 2013-03-11 15:31 +0000 |
| Organization | Public Access Networks Corp. |
| Message-ID | <khktbp$9su$1@reader2.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <6ojslt$p4m@dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com> <XnsA173C4B7CDB3BCSKJHNMW985780A@94.75.214.90> <kgjbs7$hlj$1@reader1.panix.com> <XnsA174B8651240DCSKJHNMW985780A@94.75.214.90> |
In article <XnsA174B8651240DCSKJHNMW985780A@94.75.214.90>, Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote: > >I say, do you mean that such wondrous distributions such as >Basic Linux are of no use? Why, when booted from DOS, even the Yeah, I wanted a real linux that booted from the hard drive. Finally went with an old Slackware distribution. After I found a couple of those playing card size CF'ish memory upgrades on line somewhere I even had enough memory to run X. >Not even an X windows system is beyond its reach! Err, as long >as you have a spare quarter hour for it to load. I swapped out the teeny little hard drive for a 2GB ZIF SDD plugged into an adaptor. It helped. Still, compared to my (relatively) brand new Dell C400 it was hardly worth the mWh it took to boot it... :-) >Oh, that does sound like fun. I have a business targeted x86 >laptop from the same era with a 100MHz 486, but that >"Tadpole" really is something special. Yeah, uses a little Apple scsi disc and cost something like 10 grand when it was new. Looks like a Thinkpad. In fact, Tadpole bought unlabeled Thinkpad cases (and keyboards) from IBM to put its little Suns into. I'm more of a hacker than collector, and spend too much time trying to "upgrade" ancient stuff so I can say I'm still using it :-)
Back to comp.sys.laptops | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Lightweight Laptops??? Bob_Villa <pheeh.zero@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 04:08 -0800
Re: Lightweight Laptops??? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2013-02-20 18:29 -0500
Re: Lightweight Laptops??? Bob_Villa <pheeh.zero@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 18:40 -0800
Re: Lightweight Laptops??? micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2013-02-21 07:05 -0500
Re: Lightweight Laptops??? Bob_Villa <pheeh.zero@gmail.com> - 2013-02-21 04:49 -0800
Re: Lightweight Laptops??? micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2013-02-21 10:41 -0500
Re: Lightweight Laptops??? cameo <cameo@unreal.invalid> - 2013-02-21 19:53 -0800
Re: Lightweight Laptops??? micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2013-02-22 05:08 -0500
Re: Lightweight Laptops??? Bob_Villa <pheeh.zero@gmail.com> - 2013-02-22 03:07 -0800
Re: Lightweight Laptops??? cameo <cameo@unreal.invalid> - 2013-02-22 12:13 -0800
Re: Lightweight Laptops??? "~misfit~" <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> - 2013-02-23 15:28 +1300
Re: Lightweight Laptops??? Bob_Villa <pheeh.zero@gmail.com> - 2013-02-23 05:08 -0800
Re: Lightweight Laptops??? micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2013-02-24 02:00 -0500
Re: Lightweight Laptops??? "~misfit~" <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> - 2013-02-26 01:22 +1300
Re: Lightweight Laptops??? Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you> - 2013-02-26 08:20 +0000
Re: Lightweight Laptops??? wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2013-02-26 22:10 +0000
Re: Lightweight Laptops??? Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2013-02-27 07:07 +0000
Re: Lightweight Laptops??? wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2013-03-11 15:31 +0000
Re: Lightweight Laptops??? Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2013-03-12 09:29 +0000
Re: Lightweight Laptops??? wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2013-02-26 21:56 +0000
Re: Lightweight Laptops??? "~misfit~" <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> - 2013-02-27 23:01 +1300
Re: Lightweight Laptops??? wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2013-03-11 15:33 +0000
Re: Lightweight Laptops??? "~misfit~" <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> - 2013-03-13 14:20 +1300
csiph-web