Re: Lightweight Laptops???

From	Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.laptops
Subject	Re: Lightweight Laptops???
Date	2013-02-20 18:29 -0500
Organization	National Capital Freenet, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Message-ID	<alpine.LNX.2.02.1302201825150.26668@darkstar.example.org> (permalink)
References	<6ojslt$p4m@dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com> <35AEBA6A.DB1@uci.edu> <50677927-3d32-44c1-8767-ffa05d485ced@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bob_Villa wrote:

> On Thursday, July 16, 1998 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, David Chien wrote:
>
>> Easy to carry about, and anything with a 10-11" screen on these
>> tiny portables will usually give you 800x600 resolution and enough space
>> to be decent under Windows 95.
>
> David, are you sure you wanted to mention W95? WTF! Sony stuff is all 
> consumer-grade and way over-priced. I would check on Asus for a light 
> weight.
>
Yes, he wants to run WIndows 95, it's not that old.

The post is from 1998.

Some idiot replied yet again to an old message, it seems for the purpose 
of spamming, and you fell for it, not realizing it was an old thread, even 
though you replied to the original post.

Widnows 95 isn't out of place for a 1998 computer

Any laptop today is likely going to be lighter than the laptops of 1998, 
and with a lot more capability.

But since google still hasnt' fixed the bug that allows replies to 
messages older than 30 days (they had the bug one time before, when they 
upgraded, then they fixed it, but the bug was back with the last 
"upgrade", they not caring since they are really thinking about their own 
"groups" and they see no reason to limit that, even though it is actually 
stupid), idiots can reply to old posts, and others follow, not ever 
wondering where the original post is, not looking at the date.

   Michael

Thread

Re: Lightweight Laptops??? Bob_Villa <pheeh.zero@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 04:08 -0800
  Re: Lightweight Laptops??? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2013-02-20 18:29 -0500
    Re: Lightweight Laptops??? Bob_Villa <pheeh.zero@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 18:40 -0800
    Re: Lightweight Laptops??? micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2013-02-21 07:05 -0500
      Re: Lightweight Laptops??? Bob_Villa <pheeh.zero@gmail.com> - 2013-02-21 04:49 -0800
        Re: Lightweight Laptops??? micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2013-02-21 10:41 -0500
          Re: Lightweight Laptops??? cameo <cameo@unreal.invalid> - 2013-02-21 19:53 -0800
            Re: Lightweight Laptops??? micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2013-02-22 05:08 -0500
              Re: Lightweight Laptops??? Bob_Villa <pheeh.zero@gmail.com> - 2013-02-22 03:07 -0800
              Re: Lightweight Laptops??? cameo <cameo@unreal.invalid> - 2013-02-22 12:13 -0800
  Re: Lightweight Laptops??? "~misfit~" <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> - 2013-02-23 15:28 +1300
    Re: Lightweight Laptops??? Bob_Villa <pheeh.zero@gmail.com> - 2013-02-23 05:08 -0800
      Re: Lightweight Laptops??? micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com> - 2013-02-24 02:00 -0500
      Re: Lightweight Laptops??? "~misfit~" <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> - 2013-02-26 01:22 +1300
        Re: Lightweight Laptops??? Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you> - 2013-02-26 08:20 +0000
          Re: Lightweight Laptops??? wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2013-02-26 22:10 +0000
            Re: Lightweight Laptops??? Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2013-02-27 07:07 +0000
              Re: Lightweight Laptops??? wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2013-03-11 15:31 +0000
                Re: Lightweight Laptops??? Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2013-03-12 09:29 +0000
    Re: Lightweight Laptops??? wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2013-02-26 21:56 +0000
      Re: Lightweight Laptops??? "~misfit~" <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> - 2013-02-27 23:01 +1300
        Re: Lightweight Laptops??? wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2013-03-11 15:33 +0000
          Re: Lightweight Laptops??? "~misfit~" <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> - 2013-03-13 14:20 +1300

csiph-web