Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.laptops > #610

Re: Sony laptop battery

From jeradl <jeradl.4yvis5@no.email.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.sys.laptops
Subject Re: Sony laptop battery
Date 2011-08-21 20:47 -0500
Message-ID <jeradl.4yvis5@no.email.invalid> (permalink)
Organization NNTPGW
References <Xns9E92DA7D8DE45spamretarderw1ldswan@216.196.109.145> <d37d6263-d127-410c-be2c-f949aa42d73b@r19g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <Xns9EBAE01477B77spamretarderw1ldswan@216.196.109.145>

Show all headers | View raw

Also, there will be internal battery chemical degradation even when it's
not in use. The percentage is greater in nickel-based batteries, but
there is still some in li-ion. And within li-ion batteries there are
"dumb" types, which have no degradation, but will lose capacity; and
"smart" types which have some degradation, but only around 5-10%
compared to nickel-based 25-30%. Keep that in mind when buying your next
laptop batteries.

Back to comp.sys.laptops | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Sony laptop battery "D@ve Pr1ce" <spamretarder@w1ldswan.plus.com> - 2011-04-01 16:01 -0500
  Re: Sony laptop battery jeradl <jeradl.4yvis5@no.email.invalid> - 2011-08-21 20:47 -0500
    Re: Sony laptop battery "Anthony R. Gold" <not-for-mail@ahjg.co.uk> - 2011-08-25 21:26 +0100
      Re: Sony laptop battery BillW50 <BillW50@aol.kom> - 2011-08-25 16:10 -0500
        Re: Sony laptop battery "Anthony R. Gold" <not-for-mail@ahjg.co.uk> - 2011-08-25 23:29 +0100
          Re: Sony laptop battery BillW50 <BillW50@aol.kom> - 2011-08-25 18:34 -0500

csiph-web