Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage > #5539
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!news.informatik.hu-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage, uk.comp.homebuilt |
| Subject | Re: "Consumer-grade SSDs actually last a hell of a long time" |
| Date | Fri, 20 Jun 2014 20:28:42 +0100 |
| Lines | 14 |
| Message-ID | <20140620202842.1a2fbfe4@hyperion> (permalink) |
| References | <lnpsek$6vo$1@dont-email.me> <c0bcs8Fdu62U1@mid.individual.net> <53a0a06c$1@news.bnb-lp.com> <3ou2q9p97haauak10o0dj7amk5njr6q2h5@4ax.com> <P0hra6AoRApTFwdM@jasper.org.uk> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net KAir+vxDK9EuXr61fgB+Ngr5l2fPOafZLlhIamPvOoc3LtPL8= |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:fe37OBH4xnTt5dlouCQoAIEIJqc= |
| X-Newsreader | Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
| X-Face | -%!sEvEmu1^sE_cg/C*FkO+yp>Mb1!P3;"2[i&?+~C~&3Ij\EW#xv{=A_9L5TI^=Q-h[id[ 12tqNfcr'3h0m_N|*_#N>>#Z6-2d1't90*G}0c,)tOl0q4e_nQx}(;"g]0xJgYHH]cD;k7ZxCoI%K[ H2J3@n:NH)h+HQQv-jP3EYU|.*HZ6q6nwd5N7uOFIr+@ |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage:5539 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 10:52:40 +0100 Mike Tomlinson <mike@jasper.org.uk> wrote: > This is actually quite an important question. > > If data are written to an SSD and that SSD is then unplugged, what is > the guaranteed retention time without corruption, of that data? > > Hard disks are well known to suffer from "bit-rot", but do we have any > data on whether it's a problem on SSDs? > Just in case it is you can generate PAR files for anything important, so minor bit rot is less likely to stop you recovering your files.
Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"Consumer-grade SSDs actually last a hell of a long time" Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-06-17 12:04 -0500
Re: "Consumer-grade SSDs actually last a hell of a long time" "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-06-18 03:39 +1000
Re: "Consumer-grade SSDs actually last a hell of a long time" Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2014-06-17 16:09 -0400
Re: "Consumer-grade SSDs actually last a hell of a long time" Mark F <mark53916@gmail.com> - 2014-06-18 07:47 -0400
Re: "Consumer-grade SSDs actually last a hell of a long time" Mike Tomlinson <mike@jasper.org.uk> - 2014-06-20 10:52 +0100
Re: "Consumer-grade SSDs actually last a hell of a long time" Mark F <mark53916@gmail.com> - 2014-06-20 08:24 -0400
Re: "Consumer-grade SSDs actually last a hell of a long time" RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> - 2014-06-20 13:31 +0100
Re: "Consumer-grade SSDs actually last a hell of a long time" GB <NOTsomeone@microsoft.com> - 2014-06-20 14:29 +0100
Re: "Consumer-grade SSDs actually last a hell of a long time" Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com> - 2014-06-20 20:28 +0100
Re: "Consumer-grade SSDs actually last a hell of a long time" "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-06-20 06:14 +1000
Re: "Consumer-grade SSDs actually last a hell of a long time" VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2014-06-17 18:30 -0500
Re: "Consumer-grade SSDs actually last a hell of a long time" Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2014-06-18 01:51 +0000
Re: "Consumer-grade SSDs actually last a hell of a long time" Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-06-18 13:21 -0300
Re: "Consumer-grade SSDs actually last a hell of a long time" Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2014-06-19 11:40 -0400
Re: "Consumer-grade SSDs actually last a hell of a long time" Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-06-19 19:27 -0300
csiph-web