Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.apple2.programmer > #4440

Re: Problems building with ca65/ld65 ...

From "Bill Buckels" <bbuckels@mts.net>
Newsgroups comp.sys.apple2.programmer
Subject Re: Problems building with ca65/ld65 ...
Date 2018-03-24 03:47 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <p953bm$ov1$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <5b08bfda-e7dc-4d98-aead-26c03539418f@googlegroups.com> <1e75a869-3c64-4d3e-ac4e-d75acb0bc90f@googlegroups.com> <7bea89fe-9a22-41b7-a091-ec2c162b283b@googlegroups.com> <p91d0i$835$1@news.albasani.net> <46ed59a4-c708-43f8-b07a-008b50bbbc47@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


"Michael Pohoreski" <michael.pohoreski@gmail.com> wrote:
>If **ca65 didn't suck** then one would be able to do: `cc65 <file.s> -o 
>file` and have it automatically call the assembler and linker to produce a 
>working binary.

I think you are a little overboard on that last remark. That's not the way a 
C cross-compiler for the Apple IIe works despite whether or not it's a user 
experience that suits all of peoplekind.

I can agree that it takes a special kind of moron to not be able to produce 
programs in cc65 for the Apple IIe. These rookie mistakes of not setting 
environments are no big reason to condemn cc65 to the scrap-heap.

>However, the fact that you are too fucking lazy to streamline the whole 
>Apple 2 toolchain process

<snip>

I'm lazier than both of you and I don't have a problem with cc65 for what it 
is.

>I don't give a fuck about your opinion

I extend the same courtesy to most of the Apple II community :) The IBM-PC 
(and clones) was a much better computer for what I needed in the '80's. But 
for old kid's toys, the 6502 machines are a hoot to play with... there isn't 
much challenge getting old MS-DOS programs to work... but it's still the 
wild west in here, cowboy!

Bill

Back to comp.sys.apple2.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Problems building with ca65/ld65 ... James Keim <email@jameskeim.com> - 2018-03-21 19:19 -0700
  Problems building with ca65/ld65 ... Michael Pohoreski <michael.pohoreski@gmail.com> - 2018-03-21 21:49 -0700
    Re: Problems building with ca65/ld65 ... James Keim <email@jameskeim.com> - 2018-03-21 22:26 -0700
      Re: Problems building with ca65/ld65 ... James Keim <email@jameskeim.com> - 2018-03-21 23:14 -0700
        Re: Problems building with ca65/ld65 ... MG <*@guidero.us> - 2018-03-22 00:10 -0700
          Re: Problems building with ca65/ld65 ... James Keim <email@jameskeim.com> - 2018-03-22 06:33 -0700
          Re: Problems building with ca65/ld65 ... Michael Pohoreski <michael.pohoreski@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 10:38 -0700
            Re: Problems building with ca65/ld65 ... ol.sc@web.de (Oliver Schmidt) - 2018-03-22 23:08 +0000
              Re: Problems building with ca65/ld65 ... Antoine Vignau <antoine.vignau@laposte.net> - 2018-03-22 19:27 -0700
                Re: Problems building with ca65/ld65 ... Steve Nickolas <usotsuki@buric.co> - 2018-03-22 22:55 -0400
                Re: Problems building with ca65/ld65 ... ol.sc@web.de (Oliver Schmidt) - 2018-03-23 21:33 +0000
                Re: Problems building with ca65/ld65 ... Steve Nickolas <usotsuki@buric.co> - 2018-03-23 18:51 -0400
                Re: Problems building with ca65/ld65 ... ol.sc@web.de (Oliver Schmidt) - 2018-03-24 07:27 +0000
                Re: Problems building with ca65/ld65 ... ol.sc@web.de (Oliver Schmidt) - 2018-03-23 21:33 +0000
                Re: Problems building with ca65/ld65 ... Antoine Vignau <antoine.vignau@laposte.net> - 2018-03-23 16:16 -0700
                Re: Problems building with ca65/ld65 ... ol.sc@web.de (Oliver Schmidt) - 2018-03-24 07:32 +0000
                Re: Problems building with ca65/ld65 ... "Bill Buckels" <bbuckels@mts.net> - 2018-03-24 03:24 -0500
              Re: Problems building with ca65/ld65 ... Michael Pohoreski <michael.pohoreski@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 21:05 -0700
                Re: Problems building with ca65/ld65 ... MG <guidero@gmail.com> - 2018-03-23 09:17 -0700
                Re: Problems building with ca65/ld65 ... "Bill Buckels" <bbuckels@mts.net> - 2018-03-24 03:47 -0500
          Re: Problems building with ca65/ld65 ... Michael Pohoreski <michael.pohoreski@gmail.com> - 2018-03-23 11:03 -0700
            Re: Problems building with ca65/ld65 ... Antoine Vignau <antoine.vignau@laposte.net> - 2018-03-23 14:10 -0700
      Re: Problems building with ca65/ld65 ... Michael Pohoreski <michael.pohoreski@gmail.com> - 2018-03-23 07:57 -0700

csiph-web