Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.acorn.programmer > #230 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Richard Russell" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-04-30 11:57 +0100 |
| Last post | 2011-05-01 01:38 -0700 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.acorn.programmer
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: What happened to LIBRARY LOCAL? "Richard Russell" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2011-04-30 11:57 +0100
Re: What happened to LIBRARY LOCAL? Matthew Wightman <matthew.wightman@gmail.com> - 2011-04-30 13:05 +0100
Re: What happened to LIBRARY LOCAL? "Richard Russell" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2011-04-30 18:13 +0100
Re: What happened to LIBRARY LOCAL? Sprow <news@sprow.co.uk> - 2011-05-01 01:38 -0700
| From | "Richard Russell" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-30 11:57 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: What happened to LIBRARY LOCAL? |
| Message-ID | <op.vuqzerd6n5ksl5@richard> |
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 11:09:38 +0100, Matthew Wightman <matthew.wightman@gmail.com> wrote: > Looking through the Brandy documentation, there do seem to be a number > of other extensions, in addition to the ones mentioned in the article. Specifically what? The article (thanks very much for the link, I hadn't read it before) lists long strings and LIBRARY LOCAL as the only "major" changes. The remaining ones mentioned (for example an optional TO clause for OSCLI and the FILEPATH$ pseudo-variable) are very minor in terms of extending the language. My attempts to use Brandy (v1.16) have been stymied by bugs, particularly related to @%. For example this code simply prints out "F": @%=&2090F PRINT PI Richard. http://www.rtrussell.co.uk/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Matthew Wightman <matthew.wightman@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-30 13:05 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ipgtur$lqu$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #230 |
On 30/04/2011 11:57, Richard Russell wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 11:09:38 +0100, Matthew Wightman
> <matthew.wightman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Looking through the Brandy documentation, there do seem to be a number
>> of other extensions, in addition to the ones mentioned in the article.
>
> Specifically what? The article (thanks very much for the link, I hadn't
> read it before) lists long strings and LIBRARY LOCAL as the only "major"
> changes. The remaining ones mentioned (for example an optional TO clause
> for OSCLI and the FILEPATH$ pseudo-variable) are very minor in terms of
> extending the language.
The extensions I was noticing while browsing through the documentation
were also minor things: places you could give lists of values where
other implementations accept only one value (BPUT#, INSTALL), along with
added functions such as "VERIFY(" and "XLATE$(".
>
> My attempts to use Brandy (v1.16) have been stymied by bugs,
> particularly related to @%. For example this code simply prints out "F":
>
> @%=&2090F
> PRINT PI
FWIW, the most recent version of Brandy I can find ("Brandy Basic V
Interpreter Version 1.20pre5 (Linux) 26-Dec-2007") prints
" 3.141592654" for PI with that value of @%.
>
> Richard.
> http://www.rtrussell.co.uk/
--
Matthew Wightman
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Richard Russell" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-30 18:13 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.vurgsg1on5ksl5@richard> |
| In reply to | #233 |
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:05:43 +0100, Matthew Wightman
<matthew.wightman@gmail.com> wrote:
> FWIW, the most recent version of Brandy I can find ("Brandy Basic V
> Interpreter Version 1.20pre5 (Linux) 26-Dec-2007") prints
> " 3.141592654" for PI with that value of @%.
At Brandy's own web page (http://jaguar.orpheusweb.co.uk/branpage.html) it
states 'The current versions of the program are 1.19 (RISC OS and
*BSD/Linux/Amiga) and 1.16 (DOS/Windows)' so I'm assuming '1.20pre5' is a
pre-release version. In any case I need the DOS/Windows version which
seems to be stalled at 1.16 (possibly because the JLib graphics library it
uses is no longer available).
Richard.
http://www.rtrussell.co.uk/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprow <news@sprow.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-05-01 01:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8332e99c-d51c-4e74-973c-49d6d2140b3d@f18g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #262 |
On Apr 30, 6:13 pm, "Richard Russell" <n...@rtrussell.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:05:43 +0100, Matthew Wightman
>
> <matthew.wight...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > FWIW, the most recent version of Brandy I can find ("Brandy
> > Basic V Interpreter Version 1.20pre5
> In any case I need the DOS/Windows version which
> seems to be stalled at 1.16 (possibly because the JLib graphics
> library it uses is no longer available).
I modified it to 120pre6 to compile with MinGW a while back, but my
patches are sitting on SourceForge waiting for the maintainer to
ignore them some more.
Temporarily I'll leave the sources here
http://www.sprow.co.uk/brandy_120pre6.zip
you'll need MinGW to compile it for Windows. It runs multithreaded any
everything, but no graphics output (because I didn't need it and
couldn't find JLib),
Sprow.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.acorn.programmer
csiph-web