Groups > comp.sys.acorn.programmer > #230

Re: What happened to LIBRARY LOCAL?

Newsgroups	comp.sys.acorn.programmer
Subject	Re: What happened to LIBRARY LOCAL?
References	<op.vupcgvdvn5ksl5@richard> <ipfapn$r1g$1@dont-email.me> <op.vuqvirovn5ksl5@richard> <ipgn55$kdi$1@dont-email.me>
Date	2011-04-30 11:57 +0100
From	"Richard Russell" <news@rtrussell.co.uk>
Message-ID	<op.vuqzerd6n5ksl5@richard> (permalink)
Organization	Zen Internet

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 11:09:38 +0100, Matthew Wightman  
<matthew.wightman@gmail.com> wrote:

> Looking through the Brandy documentation, there do seem to be a number  
> of other extensions, in addition to the ones mentioned in the article.

Specifically what?  The article (thanks very much for the link, I hadn't  
read it before) lists long strings and LIBRARY LOCAL as the only "major"  
changes.  The remaining ones mentioned (for example an optional TO clause  
for OSCLI and the FILEPATH$ pseudo-variable) are very minor in terms of  
extending the language.

My attempts to use Brandy (v1.16) have been stymied by bugs, particularly  
related to @%.  For example this code simply prints out "F":

   @%=&2090F
   PRINT PI

Richard.
http://www.rtrussell.co.uk/

Back to comp.sys.acorn.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: What happened to LIBRARY LOCAL? "Richard Russell" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2011-04-30 11:57 +0100
  Re: What happened to LIBRARY LOCAL? Matthew Wightman <matthew.wightman@gmail.com> - 2011-04-30 13:05 +0100
    Re: What happened to LIBRARY LOCAL? "Richard Russell" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2011-04-30 18:13 +0100
      Re: What happened to LIBRARY LOCAL? Sprow <news@sprow.co.uk> - 2011-05-01 01:38 -0700

csiph-web